Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: joer
Page: <<prev 1 ... 1617 1618 1619 1620 1621 1622 1623 1624 1625 1626 next>>
Jul 23, 2013 20:32:01   #
IR Jim wrote:
Just FYI the video card is only important if you are gaming, rendering 3D, or encoding video. Newer MOBOs have Nvidia or Radeon integrated graphics, one of those are cheaper and just fine.

Linked below is a FAQ from Adobe in regards to photoshop CS6 GPU usage. You will find that it only uses a GPU for a select few features and only 256MB at that. (512 needed for features to be enabled but only utilizes 256). That's big and bad CS6.

http://forums.adobe.com/thread/979969

Also go with a quad core CPU, you will get more bang for your buck vs. 2, 6, or 8.
Just FYI the video card is only important if you a... (show quote)


I agree gaming card excel at 3D which Photo editors like PS do not use. The problem is finding a good 2D graphics card.
Go to
Jul 23, 2013 20:21:14   #
craggycrossers wrote:
Riada - there's a lot of excitement in the mirrorless marketplace at present because of the imminent arrival of the Panasonic GX7 in September and a possible replacement for the award-winning Olympus OM-D E-M5 soon afterwards. Happy to help.


Mirror-less has got me interested too. Owning quite a bit of Nikon equipment I am so disappointed that they are behind the curve.

I look forward to the new releases. Thanks for the update.
Go to
Jul 23, 2013 20:14:41   #
CaptainC wrote:
For these kinds of images, I would just aim the flash right at them and nuke 'em! These are not portraits, they are not art, they are just a recording of people at an event. Even the hard and harsh light from direct flash is better than this.

If you are going to do this on a regular basis, get a stroboframe flash bracket of similar, get a TTL cord for the flash and then get the flash up above the lens by 8-12" and attach something like a small Lumiquest softboxIII. YOU get direct flash but the height kills that red-eye (to a degree), and the height makes it a bit less direct, and the soft box gives you 15 to 30 times the area so it is a bit softer. I do this for events in dark areas all the time.

Here are two examples from a heavy equipment trade show in a dark convention hall. Nikon D700, ISO 400 1/60 @ f/3.5 with the strobe frame bracket and a Lumiquest SoftboxIII using a Nikon Sb800.

Piece of cake.
For these kinds of images, I would just aim the fl... (show quote)


Nobody does flash as well as Nikon. I love my D700 too.
Go to
Jul 23, 2013 20:12:30   #
Starr wrote:
I was using an external flash but there was nothing to bounce the light off of. I just purchased a Vivitar flash but now I know I need to stick with my camera brand, Pentax.

I love B&H.

Thank you...


Stick with the Vivitar since you already have it. All you need is the bounce attachment. You can make it work. The beauty of digital is that you can easily dial in your settings with a few practice shots
Go to
Jul 23, 2013 20:07:40   #
2da4est wrote:
I just received my d800 which I bought used from keh. A few things to get used to that I will but one thing bothers me and I don't know if it is just the nature of the beast or is there something wrong. The shutter seems slow and loud. I have read that there may be a noticeable mirror slap. Compared to my d7000 it seems very slow and loud. Can someone please shed some light on this for me? If this is the way it is suppose to be can you get good birds in flight? Do you just shoot in quiet mode? Should I send it back? The resolution is beautiful and I will be going out early tomorrow morning to try to get some bird shots so any suggestions will be appreciated.
I just received my d800 which I bought used from k... (show quote)


Congrats. The D800 will be a great camera once you get used to it..
Go to
Jul 23, 2013 19:34:10   #
mdorn wrote:
Is your point that most suffer from functional fixedness?


I don't know what you mean by "functional fixedness." Please explain.
Go to
Jul 23, 2013 19:32:40   #
LoneRangeFinder wrote:
I tend to agree with Danilo. I hike often with my DSLR+3 lenses, and a tripod. It all fits on my back. There are two primary reasons I'm out there: I love exploring and I love to photograph while exploring.


Thank you to all those that agree with Danilo. Since you can accept one and reject the other based on your preference for what you use then equipment does matter.

I've proven my point.
Go to
Jul 23, 2013 17:49:17   #
I know some of are going to tell me that its the person behind the camera that makes the difference, and of course you are right, some of the time..

But equipment matters a lot. The attached images illustrate my point.

The first was taken with a P&S with a flip up monitor (P7100) after walking into the forest preserve over a mile.

The second was shot from my deck with a DSLR 300MM lens +1.4 Ext ( D7100 with Sigma 2.8 lens and matched multiplier mounted on a tripod).

Could I have taken each photo with the opposite rigs? Not very likely. I would have to get so close to the bird with the P&S I'd scare it away. Can you image lugging the DSLR combo for hours on end. Plus I'd have to take it off the tripod to get the same prospective.

Did I make my point?




Go to
Jul 23, 2013 16:23:15   #
Great shot! At a time like that, who cares about rules? The best shot is the one you get,

You got that right. This shot was sheer luck. Do it often enough and you are bound to get a good one once in awhile.

Thanks.
Go to
Jul 23, 2013 13:03:37   #
CBL19six9 wrote:
The south Texas view. Yours is awesome JoeR


Thanks. It was from back in the day when I thought I was a photographer.
Go to
Jul 23, 2013 12:50:48   #
sodapop wrote:
Hi all. Would a Nikon 35mm f/1.8 DX lens be a good recommendation for a Nikon 3000? (I know, entry level camera, but works for now for me). Or, is there a better recommendation for this class of lenses? Your suggestions are always greatly valued.

Thanks

soda


This may be a stretch if you are on a budget but look at Sigma's 18-35MM 1.8 zoom. It blows away most primes.

Go to DPReview and compare it to Nikon, Canon and Zeiss primes. I kid you not.
Go to
Jul 23, 2013 12:34:22   #
Starr wrote:
Please help. The last two events I photographed were held in rooms that were all wood - walls, floors, ceiling and furniture. I had a terrible time getting any photos to work out. There was nothing to bounce my external flash off of so pictures turned out too dark. My ISO was at 1600/3200 and metered my camera but still the colors were all off. I spent way too much time in post processing. Any suggestions?


You need an external flash with a bounce attachment.

If you don't already have an external flash get the most powerful one you can afford. Stick with your camera brand. Other brands will work fine if you know what your doing but usually you don't get the full features of the camera/flash.

Check out B&H Photo. They have every thing you can image and more. They are as reliable as death & taxes and have a hassle free return policy. No I don't work for them.
Go to
Jul 23, 2013 11:07:43   #
rmalarz wrote:
In all, it is, also, best to know your equipment completely. What it is capable of doing and what it is not. This should also include the huge piece of equipment immediately behind the viewfinder.
--Bob


Its not that huge, really. LOL.
Go to
Jul 23, 2013 11:05:41   #
EstherP wrote:
This statement I complete disagree with! Comparing my backyard with the Grand Canyon is like comparing apples and oranges!
And to quote you again: Look for opportunities!
Where in the grand canyon will you find (or even look for) the beautiful lichens on the branches of the fruit trees? Or the grandkids splashing around in a 4-foot pool with just 1 1/2 inches of water? Or the robins's nest under the sundeck? I would say that my backyard very much competes with the Grand Canyon - and wins hands down as I'm here almost year-round...
EstherP
This statement I complete disagree with! Comparing... (show quote)



I'm sure you could find most things in the Grand Canyon that are in your backyard. Except maybe your grand kids.

There is nothing like dissent to promote discourse.
Go to
Jul 23, 2013 11:00:15   #
wtompkins wrote:
It was in and out of the clouds, and the mosquitoes were feasting on my ankles, so I didn't stay out long.


I Like your moon designation. Here is one of mine.


Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 1617 1618 1619 1620 1621 1622 1623 1624 1625 1626 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.