Actually HE did not declare the use of chemical weapon illegal nor did he create the 'red line', if I recall, the war in Iraq was about this unfamous 'red line', remember??? The Ligue of nations did. Syria that did not exist as an independent country at the time (1925?) is not a 'signator', one of the very few countries who have not agreed to ban this weapon.

Go for it. Refurbished have the same warranty has a new item. Just make sure you register it upon reception.

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

I shoot with a Nikon D800e, an upgrade from the D300. I had to send my D800e for warranty repair and regretted it's absence while using the D300.
I am supposed to get the D800e back this week and will relegate the D300 to a dusty backup use.

The problem I had with it was not reported by anyone else (that I could find) so it was fluke, not a design or manufacturing ill to be fixed on all.

Now if you are an 'amateur' the price maybe hefty but then again, who knows.

:shock:

You are right to hide behind your dog!!!

:lol: :thumbup:

Always love a moron who comes on threads as a 'christian-full of love-and-faith-and-whatever'... When this same person interferes with other folks threads just to irritate them, by his own admission. Very 'christian like' if you ask me.
This shows the hypocrisy behind it all. (Not to mention the lack of reading and understanding skills)

Reference: http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/compose_reply.jsp?topicnum=146685&postnum=2476737

Lack of reading skills... did not pay attention to the beginning of the thread. Lack of understanding AND reading skills when the 'preacher' said the post was wrongly referenced. It was about NOT being an artist, not about the image posting.

When you see that this OP has no reading skills and no understanding...
How can you trust anything he post?
I do not.

You cannot herd wild US 'christian' conservative old cats.
Kick one at the time away is all you can do, just as in real life.
Just remember that while an user can appear obnoxious in real life the person may not be that way. MAY being the keyword. Personalities on line usually demonstrate the worse part of an individual as folks feel like 'speaking' on a forum does not matter.
It does, it is a reflection on them and not a good one.

As to mys signature being rude. It is not. It is blunt, straight to the point and leaves very little to interpretation.

Now I am waiting for the flame that will follow these statements...

He means that can 'print' a picture on the cloth, or so I think. They print on everything else now so, why not?

Sorry, delayed answer...
What I miss?
Here is a sample from a screen capture of an image taken in May 2013
1:1, no correction but JPG and 72 dpi produced by ACDSee

Post your own eye picture!!!

Screen capture

It was sent because the camera produced a constant vignetting on the top corners and that regardless of the orientation when shooting.

H


V

Watched it loads of talk, very little if any information.

For info, clarity is not related to sharpening but to contrast and luminescence. As such it does NOT change the pixel order!!!

After further reading on the issue, it appears that tweaking the contrast in camera will help. Trial and error will be mandatory ...

PP answer, not shooting...
First off, thank you for the question. I had an answer for a RAW file then discovered it would not work on a JPG so I did some research.

On RAW files, when using Photoshop, there is a setting called clarity that is available only when opening a RAW file or so I thought.

To get this import menu with all the bells and whistles of RAW format, you only need to use File-Open as->RAW and click on the JPG. You can preview the result before you click 'ok'.