Posts for: FreddB
Jan 21, 2022 16:23:39 #
Quixdraw wrote:
A Nikon enthusiast since '68 or so, photography since I was 12. That was a very long time ago! 
.
.‘68 - came home from WestPac in April.
12 - the only thing I retained from Little League days was a leftover hernia the surgeon discovered while fixing two others.
Kermit was wrong - being green is a walk in the park - it’s getting old that ain’t easy! 75 yesterday, spent the day with my wife in ICU. Happy Birthday to me.
Be well. Hope it’s warmer in your neighborhood than it was in mine this morning - 12 friggin’ degrees minus the wind chill! Did I mention that I hate winter too? 🥶
Jan 21, 2022 16:06:37 #
Canisdirus wrote:
lol...what are you going on about...
Who cares about the 'fashion' statement of how proportional the lens is to the body?
Hey, make sure your shirt matches the camera strap too...lol.
And comb your hair for Pete's sake...poor Pete.
Who cares about the 'fashion' statement of how proportional the lens is to the body?
Hey, make sure your shirt matches the camera strap too...lol.
And comb your hair for Pete's sake...poor Pete.
Typical response from you.
It’s HIS gear, not yours. If he gets a little enjoyment from the way it looks, no sweat off your ass. If it bothers you, it just became YOUR problem, not his.
Have a wonderful day - I know I will.
✌🏻
Jan 20, 2022 00:15:18 #
FreddB wrote:
That’s what I like about this place - keep an open mind, ask questions, and there’s usually (not always - there are plenty of jerks waiting to tell you how great they are) someone willing to share their knowledge. And, there’s always something new to learn.
So, thanks for the explanation. 👍
So, thanks for the explanation. 👍
Before the vultures move in - yes, I saw quixdraw’s and goofy’s responses before I posted mine. I just thought bebu and spirit might like to clarify that they were asking reasonable questions, not taking shots at each other.
Jan 20, 2022 00:08:37 #
Quixdraw wrote:
A GN was a Nikon lens specifically designed for us... (show quote)
And all of that looks smaller than some of the new adapters alone!
Jan 20, 2022 00:01:28 #
BebuLamar wrote:
So if you use the small primes that I have your cameras are too big and look very ugly.
I think you were asking a question, not issuing a challenge. If you were, a ? would have made that clear.
I also think “spirit” was asking you a question. IS the DF bigger? I don’t know either.
Jan 19, 2022 23:53:18 #
OldSchool-WI wrote:
Well there they go again---as Ronald Reagan would say-----name calling--insulting--"does vulgarity come next--FreddB???-------
Nope, not my M.O. If you think you ever see any, don’t hesitate to point it out. On the other hand, if you really want to see some salt, let me know that, also. I didn’t spend four years in the Navy for nothing. 🤬🤬🤬
Jan 19, 2022 23:47:17 #
Quixdraw wrote:
A GN was a Nikon lens specifically designed for us... (show quote)
That’s what I like about this place - keep an open mind, ask questions, and there’s usually (not always - there are plenty of jerks waiting to tell you how great they are) someone willing to share their knowledge. And, there’s always something new to learn.
So, thanks for the explanation. 👍
Jan 19, 2022 16:27:34 #
Quixdraw wrote:
A GN, without a flash in sight! And on a Canon!
Your either (both?) older than I am, or caught the bug earlier, but I am not familiar with the gear of which you speak. I had to go back and look at the picture to be sure that’s what you were referring to.
Anyway, is that a Nikon lens on a Canon camera? Was that a thing? And, what is the guitar pick sticking out between the lens and the mount?
Not being an ass, just ignorant.
Jan 19, 2022 16:05:12 #
User ID wrote:
.
Awwwww ... you hurted its feelings :-(
Awwwww ... you hurted its feelings :-(
Be careful sport, you’re starting to sound like your idol, Old WI, or whatever his alias is. The last thing this forum needs is another jerk.
Just sayin’. 🤷🏼♂️
Jan 19, 2022 15:37:44 #
This is the first time I’ve ever critiqued any photo not my own. So, anyone who cares to, critique my critique.
I think my first move would be to get rid of all the stray buds - they don’t add anything appealing to the scene. Maybe even a distraction. At least, then you have just the two, much more interesting players to work on, as well as more of that background to work with.
I think my first move would be to get rid of all the stray buds - they don’t add anything appealing to the scene. Maybe even a distraction. At least, then you have just the two, much more interesting players to work on, as well as more of that background to work with.
Jan 18, 2022 17:56:58 #
Fred Neveu wrote:
This is a photo of them Durango & Silverton narrow gauge (photographers special) train putting on a specular display for photographers. This is the West bound train heading toward Silverton, Colorado.
Before anyone complains of the sign I deliberately having it in the photograph as gives a sense of presents to the location. I like trains!
Before anyone complains of the sign I deliberately having it in the photograph as gives a sense of presents to the location. I like trains!
But, if you cloned and moved it closer nobody could com…
What the hell was I thinking? Chalk it up to a brain fart
Jan 18, 2022 12:38:51 #
DebAnn wrote:
Good idea Bud - stick with what you've got because it works. And don't pay attention to those who suggest the Tamron 18-400 is just a so-so lens. That's nonsense. I have one and it takes great shots.
(NOT TRUE. Read the rest of your own response just below.)
Remember that it's the person behind the lens that takes the better shots, not the camera-lens combo.
(NOT TRUE. Read the rest of your own response just below.)
Remember that it's the person behind the lens that takes the better shots, not the camera-lens combo.
Jan 18, 2022 12:32:55 #
Canisdirus wrote:
You can't go wrong with Canon at this point...
They are doing it right...across the board.
Their mirrorless lineup is sweet and extremely capable.
They are doing it right...across the board.
Their mirrorless lineup is sweet and extremely capable.
But that’s not the point, or his goal. He’s not in a damn the cost, full speed ahead quest for the best. Not everyone can afford to join that race, unfortunately. 😟
Jan 18, 2022 10:09:59 #
Beard to YellowJacket: “Ummm, you know they can clean that crap out of your ear”.
Jan 17, 2022 21:05:13 #
kb6kgx wrote:
No baseball field. The nearest airport is Van Nuys airport, roughly twelve miles to the east and this area is not in the usual flight path to or from this airport. This was a small fire in a canyon community. The helicopter would be flying at about 500 ft. above ground level. Doubtful anyone could toss a baseball bat that high :)
Well, then I’ll add my name to the consensus - you’ve got yourself a ufo 😃