Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: joer
Page: <<prev 1 ... 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 ... 1622 next>>
Apr 9, 2016 08:49:50   #
I agree with the suggestions for using a USB flash drive.
Go to
Apr 9, 2016 08:25:58   #
T_Span wrote:
In the market for a new computer monitor. This process has proven to be a little more complicated than expected. The basic concerns are how well a monitor will represent the images taken, and keeping usable menus that old eyes can easily see. As for color space, ugh.

To date, I have only seen a monitor with just sRGB and that falls short of 100% of the sRGB space. Although the images are captured in AdobeRGB, processed mostly in LR's ProPhotoRGB and exported in sRGB. I still have only seen this through a less than 100% sRGB monitor. After reading tons of info, I am leaning towards 100% sRGB only.

Is going from 1920/1080 to 2560/1440 a big difference? Roughly 77% more pixels. And, I may very well upsize to 27" wide screen or 34" ultra wide. Anything will be a big improvement from a 7 year old Dell 23" 1920/1080.

Yeah I know about 4K, 300% more pixels. If the 4K didn't come with the text scaling problems, it would be a no brainer.

Your thoughts are appreciated.
In the market for a new computer monitor. This pro... (show quote)


I'm using a Dell P2715Q at 3840x2160 running Windows 10 Pro. Images look great on it.

Win10 allows font scaling but there are issues with a few programs.

Adobe CS6 64, Bridge 64, Nikon Capture NX-D, Nik and some Topaz plugin texts are so small they are almost unusable. Win 10 has magnify feature which can be used but its awkward.

There are probably others as well so I urge caution if you intend to go that route. 4K monitors can be run at lower resolutions but what's the point of paying for something that won't be used.

PS and LR CC and the new Topaz DeNoise work correctly.

Nikon tells me that the next release of NX-D will be 4K compatible but has no release date.

Would I buy it knowing what I know today? Absolutely; the image quality is worth it to me.
Go to
Apr 8, 2016 13:10:17   #
Bill_de wrote:
I wasn't criticizing. I was (I guess not very clearly) complimenting you on concentrating on the wing as opposed to the eye.

--


Sorry Bill, I misunderstood. My error.
Go to
Apr 8, 2016 11:11:26   #
Bill_de wrote:
Forget about depth of field with a 500 at that short distance to your subject ... In this case, with the head turned away, the red portion of the wing was the strongest feature, so that would be your focus point and center of interest.


If you chose to look at the EXIF data it shows spot.

Focusing on the eye is the conventional method but it not the best feature of this bird.

Thanks Bill for the advice but I like it as is and I appreciate you looking..
Go to
Apr 8, 2016 11:06:00   #
rmalarz wrote:
It's the future of taking pictures with a cell phone.
--Bob


Time will tell.
Go to
Apr 8, 2016 10:12:20   #
isokc wrote:
I hear how hard it is to make money in photography and it's very competitive. I'm wondering what percentage of UHH members (take an educated guess if you want)make money through photography. Just for clarification, it can be small amounts, large amounts, money made through selling prints or perhaps in some other way.

Just curious. Thanks for your guesses!


Not me. I am a true amateur and do it for the satisfaction and enjoyment.
Go to
Apr 8, 2016 10:05:39   #
Is it possible this technology could migrate to other types of cameras?

http://connect.dpreview.com/post/2996733496/huawei-launches-p9-and-p9-plus-with-leica-dual-camera
Go to
Apr 8, 2016 08:20:22   #
For photographing small birds in the field, essential gear usually includes long focal length lenses which auto-focus quickly. These lenses are always bulky and heavy, often requiring a sturdy tripod and a gimbal-type tripod head. Many bird photographers find that a fixed location, such as a blind, is much more productive and less work than trying to carry & hand-hold long, heavy lens. Bird feeders and perches can be arranged to the convenience of the photographer. Typical distances for small bird photography range from 15 to 40 feet. Even with a 500mm lens, a substantial post processing crop is often required.

Subject illumination is also an issue. Not every day, nor every time of day, is ideal for bird photography. Sometimes weather or natural lighting conditions are not sufficient for short shutter durations needed for sharp photos, nor smaller apertures needed for proper DoF. Even in strong, natural sunlight, harsh shadows can hide wanted bird detail. This is when a speedlight is as essential, but even the most powerful strobe often does not adequately light the subject, nor reduce the lighting ratio.

An inexpensive device, called a Better Beamer (image #1), attaches on a speedlight head, incorporating a wide Fresnel lens to focus the light into a narrow beam, closely matching the Field-of-View, typical of long lenses. This narrowed light pattern can add two stops of light, and dramatically reduce sunlight light ratio of 4:1 to 3:1 or even 2:1 (image #2), adding much detail in previously shadow-darkened areas. And closer distances require less power, resulting in shorter recycle times. Speedlight with Better Beamer is recommended in manual mode, so exposure can be easily adjusted to photographer's preference.

The Better Beamer works nicely at “50-mm” zoom setting, with a 300mm lens (image #3), or with the speedlight zoom to most narrow setting with very long focal lengths (image #4). With focal lengths shorter than 300-mm, the light will be concentrated to the center of the photo. If you crop, this is not a problem. Also, many sophisticated speedlights have an adjustment for wider illumination width, which can help for shorter focal length lenses.

One fellow Hogger observed that his Yongnuo was aimed at about 20-feet out. Shooting at a subject farther away resulted in the upper Field-of-View being poorly illuminated. This was corrected by adding a thin shim under the speedlight head, to raise it just a tad.

Better Beamer 'flash extender'



(Download)

Nikkor 300-mm lens with Nikon SB-900 speedlight & Better Beamer


Nikkor 500-mm lens with Nikon SB-900 speedlight & Better Beamer


Dusk or night photography possible with Better Beamer

(Download)


(Download)
Go to
Apr 8, 2016 08:10:35   #
DOF can be challenging.

Distance to subject 18 feet, f8, 500mm, DOF about 1-1/2 inches. Speedlight w/Better Beamer.

Red-winged Blackbird

(Download)
Go to
Apr 8, 2016 07:56:01   #


Not our country's finest moment and it seems that we may be on the brink of doing it again if some individuals have their say.

A side to Ansel Adams not well known. Thanks for posting.
Go to
Apr 8, 2016 00:39:58   #
sailorsmom wrote:
Nice sharp shots, Joe! Looks like you got a good lens! Have fun with it!


Thanks Sue.
Go to
Apr 8, 2016 00:39:37   #
infocus wrote:
Very nice images, looks like you made a good choice. What was it?


500mm f4 D ED IF AF-S II.
Go to
Apr 7, 2016 16:16:02   #
robtenn wrote:
I am looking at purchasing the NIKKOR 24-70mm f/2.8E ED lens and I have a question. Is it worth the extra $600 to get the VR version of this lens?


You do think VR is needed? If so buy it. A year down the road you won't even remember the $600.

Yes it gets you a few extra stops but so does higher ISO.

It can slow your focus in some situations and its one more thing that can fail.
Go to
Apr 7, 2016 16:05:19   #
Cibafan wrote:
Very sharp and nice pictures, congratulations.


Thanks Cibafan.
Go to
Apr 7, 2016 14:14:49   #
Here are a couple more taken today.

Can't wait for the weather to improve.


(Download)


(Download)
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 ... 1622 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.