Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: druthven
Page: <<prev 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ... 27 next>>
Jul 26, 2023 14:52:29   #
Why can't the printer be instructed to print the photo, cropped or not, full frame on x sized paper? For instance, print full frame on 16x20 inch paper and then just trim the print. That seemed to work back in the film days.
Go to
Jul 17, 2023 15:52:47   #
jerryc41 wrote:
Funny, but I tried to email some photos from my phone to myself, but they never arrived. I've done that before with no problem. No big deal, but I'll try again. Connecting the phone to the computer didn't do anything but charge it.


I ran into that same problem. I finally found that if I went into outgoing mail on my phone and clicked send they went immediately.
Go to
Jul 16, 2023 19:15:02   #
Looks like vespula vulgaris, a yellow jacket wasp. They are territorial and can be aggressive and can sting multiple times.
Go to
Jul 15, 2023 16:15:34   #
All of my DSLRs from the Nikon Photomic to the D500 have given me excellent results. The mirrorless models may be the latest cream of the crop but any possible advantages aside, the sound of that mirror slap is something that I, and probably others, love to hear. My Lumix and Sony RX100 vii remind me of my Brownie Hawkeye.
Go to
Jul 12, 2023 15:29:37   #
billnikon wrote:
I photographed over 1200 weddings over 35 years and NEVER messed up, that's why you hire a PROFESSIONAL.


Congratulations! As per my previous post, YET.
Go to
Jul 11, 2023 16:03:51   #
The bison is a nice added touch.
Go to
Jul 11, 2023 16:01:34   #
Cryppy wrote:
Up front I will admit to having a bit of GAS as part of my motivation. I've been a moderately serious amateur since retiring 15 years ago. I started with a Nikon D60 then moved up to a D300S and settled on twin D7200s several years ago. I also have a D500 but haven't used it in the 3 years since I purchased it because the controls and settings are simpler (at least in my mind) on my trusty D7200s. My walk around kit has the D7200 with a 18-300mm lens. When I need or anticipate needing more lens horse power, mostly for wild life (I live on the Maine coast), I grab my other D7200 which has the 200-500mm always attached and at the ready. When I'm on a shoot, I virtually always have both cameras with me. I'm am not a technician by any stretch but I have a knack for decent composition so sometimes I hit the jackpot and score a great capture. I've been published a few hundred times in our weekly county newspaper and have been in magazines and tourist pamphlets published by the state. I've also received recognition a few times from the New England Newspaper Association, but mostly I'm just a retiree who loves shooting in RAW and doing post-processing in Lightroom & sometimes Picasa, and I get my kicks from the Likes on receive on my FB page when I post a good image. I'd like to purchase a new rig, mostly because I can, and have pretty much convinced myself that a Sony Mirrorless A7III with 24-105 lens could keep me busy for a while, and will likely be as good as, but not as heavy as, a Nikon D850 in combo with one of my other Nikon DX lenses (I have several). The D850 has been in my headlights for a while but I'm inclined to try a lighter weight rig. What say you folks who've considered or done a similar transition already?
Up front I will admit to having a bit of GAS as pa... (show quote)


My two main cameras are the Nikon D500 and the D7100. If I want to go small and lightweight I use the Sony RX100 vii. The differences in controls and menus between the 7100 and the 500 are miniscule compared to the differences between the Nikons and the Sony if the A 7111's menu is anything like the RX100. Going from Nikon's controls and menus to Sony's is like transitioning from English to hieroglyphics.
Go to
Jul 11, 2023 15:25:54   #
billnikon wrote:
I believe I said I didn't screw up any work. I cannot speak for others.
PS. Next time u get your car repaired, have your uncle do it since you don't like professional's.


I once mentioned to a dental colleague that the dentist who hadn't broken a root tip while performing an extraction just hadn't extracted enough teeth. Any professional who hasn't messed up just hasn't been at it long enough, no matter how long their experience has been.
Go to
Jul 8, 2023 14:49:42   #
My understanding is that a phone or camera on full auto is designed to produce an accurate representation of a scene. My phone is always on full auto since I haven't had the desire to learn otherwise and it's mainly for grab shots anyway. Never say never but my camera is 99 and 44/100ths of the time not on auto. If the post processing is done by AI then the AI should receive the credit not the photographer.
Go to
Jun 25, 2023 17:37:45   #
Well done.
Go to
Jun 24, 2023 14:44:52   #
I would be very leery of any call claiming to be from a government agency. I would ignore anything that did not come as printed material via the USPS.
Go to
Jun 21, 2023 15:06:49   #
Beautiful. What were your settings. The water indicates a pretty fast shutter speed and the sunburst a small f stop.
Go to
Jun 13, 2023 16:48:26   #
bobburk3 wrote:
I'm looking for a good lens to use on my Nikon D7200 for general landscape and some sports. I have a AF-S Nikkor 70-200 1:4 G ED which I like for sports. But I find it too long for some of the landscape shooting I do and f9or team pictures. I'm thinking the Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 24-120mm f/4G ED VR Lens might be the perfect lens. I want distant objects to be sharp as well as fairly close objects. I want it to have VR. I prefer to buy used since I can't really afford to pay thousands of dollars for a lens that I use as a hobby. But I want sharp images. Any ideas?
I'm looking for a good lens to use on my Nikon D72... (show quote)


Nikon 18-140 DX 3.5-5.6, $496.95 at B&H. Nikon 18-200 DX 3.5-5.6, $646.95 B&H. You will want the 18mm DX, 35mm equivalent of 27mm for landscapes. Back in the days of film 28mm was considered pretty wide angle.

Both of the lenses are virtually the same size and weight.
Go to
Jun 11, 2023 17:07:57   #
f8lee wrote:
Seems there is a ceertain subset of folks who just like the "tacticool" look - so as ridiculous as it seems to me (and others perhaps) they view it as desirable.

In the world of firearms this kind of thing comes to mind...


I don't care what the caliber is that guy is going to have a sore jaw.
Go to
Jun 10, 2023 17:24:56   #
hpucker99 wrote:
A new gun-style camera mount has been announced lately on Indiegogo. The warranty on the mount is probably longer than your life expectancy while using it.


This camera stock could very easily be confused with an AR style pistol especially if the user is wearing a vest with extra magazine pouches. No one could fault a cop for nailing someone with this contraption at their shoulder. Shoulder supports, (stocks), have been around for ages. Here is a photo of my original wildlife setup from the 1980's. A Kilfit stock on a Nikon F3 with a 300mm f4 lens.


(Download)
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ... 27 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.