Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: FiddleMaker
Page: <<prev 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ... 252 next>>
Feb 7, 2022 11:24:16   #
Jack 13088 wrote:
Schrödinger's Einstein?

Well, this is just a tad over my head - the unified field theory. I see you have me by 2 years in age as I came to life in 1943.
Go to
Feb 7, 2022 10:21:26   #
KTJohnson wrote:
From the "godan1 Collection".

Another excellent series. 1961 - the year I graduated from high school.
Go to
Feb 7, 2022 10:09:12   #
Lens Cap wrote:
OMG! I just found out that Einstein was a real person. I thought he was a theoretical physicist.

I think he was both all at the time, according to Max Planck !!
Go to
Feb 7, 2022 09:59:30   #
malvin wrote:
Possibly one sided?, visits often. Sometimes their paw to paw.

It appears to me that the cat is well fed and is not interested in fresh live meal.
Go to
Feb 4, 2022 11:27:24   #
tpho wrote:
Hello Seller:
Is this lens FX or DX type. If it is for FX type, please contact me at
hpho@umd.edu I would like to buy it. Thanks
Tom Pho

I am absolutely sure it is for FX because I bought the Tamron 24-70 G2 for my Nikon D750. In all honesty this 70-200 could be used with a DX Nikon mount as well but the images would be larger, of course
Go to
Feb 4, 2022 09:48:57   #
Bananapuppy wrote:
Judy, that's a great price for a wonderful lens, and I know from experience that your gear is always in "like new" condition. If I didn't already have one, I would snap it up in a heartbeat. Bp

And if I wasn't nearing 80 years old and half dead, I would also.
Go to
Feb 3, 2022 15:18:20   #
UTMike wrote:
Although I am a color guy, John, the B&W reals shows off the barn best.

No doubt about it.
Go to
Feb 3, 2022 15:17:24   #
jaymatt wrote:
I couldn’t decide which way to go with this one--I like them both.

Definitely, the B&W for me.
Go to
Feb 2, 2022 17:10:46   #
davidrb wrote:
Look closely at the photo of the F-16 dressed in Thunderbird colors. The SR is parked immediately behind and left -of-center of the Falcon. The verticle stabilizor and right hand engine exhaust are clearly visible. The tailpipe is the big, round, empty hole.

davidrb, am I looking at a portion of the SR-71's left vertical stabilizer visible just in back of the yellow canopy of the F-16 Thunderbird ? You pointed out the right vertical stabilizer.
Go to
Feb 2, 2022 11:16:00   #
davidrb wrote:
Look closely at the photo of the F-16 dressed in Thunderbird colors. The SR is parked immediately behind and left -of-center of the Falcon. The verticle stabilizor and right hand engine exhaust are clearly visible. The tailpipe is the big, round, empty hole.

Okay, got it. I would not have picked up on this. Glad you pointed it out for me. The SR-71 was quite a piece of engineering.
Go to
Feb 2, 2022 09:06:49   #
jiminnee wrote:
I thought there was something missing in those photos, but in the background I spotted the tail section of an .....SR-71. A truly awesome aircraft.

I looked again thru all the images and I could not spot the tail section of the SR-71. Which image is it in ?
Go to
Feb 2, 2022 08:14:19   #
joecichjr wrote:
A beautiful feast for the eyes 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

INDEED !!!
Go to
Feb 1, 2022 15:55:55   #
wingclui44 wrote:
Not necessary that the foliage should be white, it's IR color image, it's all depend what IR wave length of filter that was used, and plus how the the image was processed.

OK, makes sense
Go to
Feb 1, 2022 10:01:36   #
topcat wrote:
Took my IR camera to the SF Botanical Garden, and I captures this.
Any comments?

I expected the foliage to look white and not a deep purple.
Go to
Jan 31, 2022 13:03:45   #
Physlab wrote:
I generally begin with Lightroom CC and finish of the enhancement with Luminar 4 or more recently Luminar AI. Luminar Neo is to come out in February and I've been working with a beta version of that software.

Physlab

Physlab, thanks for this info. I have a monthly subscription to Lightroom/Photoshop for $10.61 a month. I might be better off with only Luminar 4 becasue I never use Photoshop and I use Lightroom only once in a while. I am just a casual user and a monthly subscription is really a waste of money for me. Luminar 4 would be fine for me.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ... 252 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.