Grow up.

The facts speak for themselves.

While at home in the United States, President Trump rails against Islamic extremism. In Indonesia, he has formed political alliances with politicians aligned with Islamist forces.

http://www.abc.net.au/4corners/stories/2017/07/03/4693993.htm

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-07-03/donald-trump-business-dealings-in-indonesia-four-corners/8669888

Actually it has officially been the hottest summer on record in Australia:


http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-01-19/2016-hottest-year-on-record-australia-needs-to-get-heat-smart/8194182

What is interesting is that apart from a small pack of hyenas who follow his leadership, the more intelligent conservatives on this forum avoid him like the plague.

It is SBW's comments themselves that are childish. Nakkh collating them into a single list is simply illustrating SBW's poor mental health.
If it is bugging you then blame SBW. They are his words.

Double post. Apologies.

On another note, speaking as an outsider, is Trump going to survive this campaign with his life intact?
It seems that he is not popular with some people on both sides of politics.

Here is the information. Trump did cancel this meeting, the police did not. You should apologise to Donna.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/03/11/trump-cancels-chicago-rally-over-security-concerns/

Skirmishes erupt after Trump cancels Chicago rally over security concerns

....

The Chicago Police Department said it was informed shortly before 6:30 p.m. that the Trump campaign had canceled the event, an announcement that took the department by surprise, according to the police chief.

The department "had no role, we were not consulted or provided an opinion" about whether or not to cancel the event, John J. Escalante, the interim police superintendent, said at a news briefing Friday night. A department spokesman said that police did not issue any public safety threats or safety risks before the cancellation.

The Trump campaign released a statement that said: “Mr. Trump just arrived in Chicago and after meeting with law enforcement has determined that for the safety of all of the tens of thousands of people that have gathered in and around the arena, tonight’s rally will be postponed to another date.”

In that case LtJNA162 you may enjoy
http://www.sbwphotography.com/about.html

So US Constitutional rights can be overridden in some circumstances? Shouldn't the NRA and their members have a problem with that? It's OK to carry concealed weapons into schools, shops, churches, movie theatres etc. but 'we' will not allow US citizens to carry weapons at a p**********l candidate's rally. Isn't that an admission of the potential for serious harm to occur when people are permitted to carry weapons in public? Just what is different about a p**********l candidate's political rally that outweighs US Citizens' constitutional rights as opposed to any other public event?

Is concealed carry of firearms banned at political rallies?

I agree that specific Position Descriptions (PD) are likely to be confidential.
Here is a generic Job Description as might form part of an advertisement for job vacancies:

http://careers.stateuniversity.com/pages/7980/Secret-Service-Special-Agent.html

I believe that the real question here is; Did the actions of the agent serve to bring the organisation he represents into disrepute?
I would expect that he is currently stood down on full pay and has been advised that he will be subjected to a confidential internal investigation.
The outcome of that investigation is likely to remain confidential.

However the organisation has made the following statement:

http://www.secretservice.gov/data/press/releases
http://www.secretservice.gov/
/MediaAdvisory030316.pdf

Media Advisory
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
March 3, 2016
The United States Secret Service provides protection for its designated protectees, including
physical security at venues that a protectee visits.
The matter involving an encounter between a member
of the Secret Service and a member of the
media is under review and we therefore cannot comment further.
Reports that the Secret Service escorted attendees out of the premises at an event in Georgia this
past Monday evening are false. The Secret Service
does not escort attendees out of protectees'
events in such circumstances and it was not the Secret Service who did so at that event.
In general, the Host Committee of an event is responsible for inviting and disinviting guests
and/or members of the gener
al public to their event. During an event, if an individual becomes
disruptive or begins to protest, it is incumbent upon the Host Committee to request that
individual leave the premises. If the individual refuses to depart, it is the sole responsibility
of
the Host Committee to request that local law enforcement remove the individual from the event.
The Secret Service does not engage in any action to address or remove any individual or group
exercising First Amendment rights who may create a disruption
at a secured venue. The Secret
Service only intervenes if an individual or group poses a security threat to a protectee or
interferes with any law enforcement activity.

the key to this situation in my opinion is the final sentence,

"The Secret Service only intervenes if an individual or group poses a security threat to a protectee or interferes with any law enforcement activity."

Apparently the Agentcy acts under authority supported by the Patriot Act and similar acts: http://library.ahima.org/xpedio/groups/public/documents/ahima/bok1_048641.hcsp?dDocName=bok1_048641
so those who have issues with this act might question whether the photographers' constitutional rights were violated (?)

http://www.secretservice.gov/protection/
http://www.secretservice.gov/join/careers/

I am not an USA citizen so if I have missed information that is obvious to a US citizen then please correct me.

Perhaps this might help:

http://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/United%20States%20Secret%20Service%20%28USSS%29%20-%20Professionalism%20within%20the%20Workforce.pdf

Offense Code 1.7
Misconduct Related to Investigative or
Protective Activities
Recklessly disregarding rules governing search, seizure, arrest,
treatment of suspects or individuals under arrest, or the exercise
of an individual’s constitutional rights.
See Federal Rules of
Criminal Procedure, Rule 41.
Mitigated: 3
–
7 Days
Penalty: 10 Days
Aggravated: 14
–
30 Days

Hmmmm.................. SBW sees himself as one of the 300........ Hmmmmm....................

“Molon Labe” what? “What the heck is that?”


http://www.doomsteaddiner.net/blog/tag/molon-labe/

You stupid little dimwit.