Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Infrared Photography section of our forum.
Posts for: mcveed
Page: <<prev 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ... 332 next>>
Jan 5, 2018 10:49:32   #
Nikon is bundling the D500 with the new, and very capable 16-80mm f2.8-4 lens for $2500. Probably a good start point until you settle into a specialty requiring specific focal length and capability.
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/explora/photography/hands-review/nikon-af-s-dx-nikkor-16-80mm-f28-4e-ed-vr-lens
Go to
Jan 5, 2018 02:05:41   #
[quote=sathca]I struggled to see how any wildlife photograph could be cliche. And it’s because I appreciate nature so much. There are no two photos that are the same. Different pose, different action, different light, different setting. Since I started I have never been at a loss to find a new and interesting animal to capture and many that I want to capture in all the ways described above. I will never tire of photographing a bald eagle or an osprey or a hawk. I will never tire of looking for a new species of duck. I will jump at any opportunity to photograph wildlife of any kind because each expedition will bring something exciting with it. The same goes for landscapes. It’s a beautiful world out there and it should be explored. I can’t believe the beauty I find everywhere I take the time to look! When I see a beautiful landscape captured I want to go there! I want to capture that scene myself! A sunset or sunrise will never be cliche! Give me a million more! Saying Steve’s pictures are cliche is like saying photographing people is cliche. Each one is unique and interesting in its own way. The thing is....when you appreciate nature, which is life itself, you’re never bored. It is filled with endless curiosities. I have a collection of photographs of weeds and they are amazing! The geometric shapes and their perfection are dazzling. From those weeds to the stars above the world is truly amazing and I am thankful for people like Steve Perry and Kristofer Rowe that capture it so well and keep the fever alive in me, to hopefully one day, be somewhat close to as good as they are! These guys didn’t set these animals up on their kitchen table and photograph them. They get up early and lug their gear to difficult locations and through trial, error and perseverance they get the shots that not many have gotten. That will never be cliche! Do you sense a passion for this stuff? Just a little :)! Do yourself a favor.....don’t die without realizing the beauty in these things. “It’s the little things in life that bring the greatest pleasure, a smile a kiss, a little babies laughter” ( SRV ) Add to that “stunning wildlife photography” ( and landscapes ) goodnight![/quote

My sentiments exactly. Well and passionately said. But for some unfortunate people a camera is an indoor toy. They will never experience the absolute joy of being alone with a magnificent wild animal on a mountain at dawn. Pity them.
Go to
Jan 4, 2018 14:51:54   #
rook2c4 wrote:
He may be good at teaching concepts, but as a photographer, he does not particularly impress me. The works in is portfolio are extremely cliche. Beyond the popping colors, it is mostly forgettable stuff.


You have pretty high standards. Can you name a wildlife photographer whose work does impress you?
Go to
Check out Smartphone Photography section of our forum.
Jan 3, 2018 07:56:18   #
You're in the wrong section. Go to Astronomical Section. Nobody here knows what you are talking about.
Go to
Jan 2, 2018 18:19:43   #
DirtFarmer wrote:
Will depend on your overlap. 3 shots overlapped 50% would be a factor of 2.


Go to
Jan 2, 2018 17:19:37   #
This is a bunch of pseudo-scientific bafflegab which obfuscates what any photographer can figure out within one hour of getting a different camera with just a little experimentation.
Go to
Jan 2, 2018 14:47:06   #
Might be helpful if we knew where you are starting from.
Go to
Check out Advice from the Pros section of our forum.
Jan 2, 2018 00:00:00   #
The only time I look at the EXIF data is when someone is asking for help with a problem picture. It can help diagnose the problem and suggest corrective action.
Go to
Jan 1, 2018 23:44:54   #
http://www.davemorrowphotography.com/p/tutorial-shooting-night-sky.html
Go to
Dec 29, 2017 18:14:25   #
autofocus wrote:
Actually it's a '50. Look at the details on the grill. The '49, like in your video, has some teeth under the grill bar, and the '50, like the OP's example, has no teeth and a cleaner look


Well, right you are! Now that that's settled anybody interested in photography?
Go to
Dec 29, 2017 13:13:16   #
Its a 1949! See the link. The one in the video has a sun visor and rear fender skirts.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZSMTIpaH1OI
Go to
Check out Infrared Photography section of our forum.
Dec 28, 2017 16:55:34   #
ronichas wrote:
The one thing that often surprises me, is how rude, nasty and mean some of the people...mostly men...are on this site. I tend to picture an old man, in his underwear, alone, lonely and posting negative comments.


Yes, there certainly are are some unkind remarks made on this site. Not all of them by men.
Go to
Dec 28, 2017 16:52:25   #
Peterff wrote:
There definitely are poorly constructed or ill thought out questions. There really are some stupid questions. We can all do those things occasionally, but I agree that there seems to be proliferation of people that want to ask questions merely for the sake of provoking discussion, not seeking information for themselves. That's not an invalid approach in a classroom / teaching situation, or a debating chamber. However there are a small number of people that are doing this on a very frequent basis which can be very disruptive to the normal or at least historical functioning of UHH. When done with excessive frequency it becomes much harder to ignore and dilutes the value of the site, it feels to me as though we are being harvested, but it isn't clear to me why or to what purpose. It's like a very loud and socially insensitive person at a gathering, it can spoil the whole party. Such behavior is disrespectful to the community and sometimes causes lasting damage or at least a permanent change to the quality of the situation.
There definitely are poorly constructed or ill tho... (show quote)

I agree most wholeheartedly. But I'm sure the primary party of whom you speak never reads anything except replies to his own posts.
Go to
Dec 28, 2017 10:53:56   #
MT Shooter wrote:
24-35mm ????
Do you mean the Sigma 24-35mm F2 Art lens?


No. Typo. I was thinking of the 17-35 f2.8D. Best wide zoom I ever used.
Go to
Dec 28, 2017 10:26:59   #
selmslie wrote:


I suggest that bokeh is dependent on its relationship to the subject. There is yin and yang at work – a symbiotic relationship between what is in focus and what is not. You can’t talk about good bokeh without a clearly in-focus subject. The bicycle and flying mud is what makes the image good. It’s not the bokeh.


Exactly. Good bokeh enhances the image. This might be through enhancing the colour balance, contributing to the mood, or in some less definable way. Bad bokeh detracts by clashing with the mood, disturbing the colour balance, or distracting attention away from the subject. Good bokeh enhances; bad bokeh detracts and distracts.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ... 332 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.