Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: mwsilvers
Page: <<prev 1 ... 1063 1064 1065 1066
May 13, 2013 21:11:50   #
Gramps wrote:
Which requires Post Processing that JPEG doesn't. I have never shot raw except when I decided I must be behind the curve from so many "Pros" discussing it's use. So far, I have never had to wish I could do more than I get from simple , emaginitive, non contrived non raw. Perhaps that's where different strokes for different folks came from?


If I understand you correctly you're implying that JPEGs never need post processing to look their best and RAW files always need post processing. If that's what your saying its inaccurate. If post processing is required for a RAW file chances are the JPEG could use it as well. Adjustments to RAW give significantly better results than adjustments to JPEG. As an example, its amazing how much detail lost in shadow areas can be recovered from RAW files in post processing. You may not miss the extra detail in you jpegs simply because you don't know its there. Just about the only thing you can't adjust is focus.
Go to
May 12, 2013 19:23:05   #
Gramps wrote:
Where is it written that you must shoot RAW? Just cuz it came with the camera doesn't mean you need to use it! Far as I can tell it was a part of digital photography because it was---figure that out expert!


I'm a bit confused as to your meaning with regard to RAW in this post. Can you clarify? If I was shooting sports I would likely shoot in JPEG most of the time. Results with JPEG files SOOC can be impressive if you have the settings right. However, since I mostly shoot landscapes, speed and long bursts are not as important to me so I generally shoot RAW for the flexibility. Unlike JPEG, RAW is a digital negative and gives me complete control over the image in post. Just about the only thing not controllable with RAW is the focus of the original image. People should shoot in whichever format meets their needs, which for me is RAW.
Go to
May 12, 2013 12:12:39   #
robert-photos wrote:
Wendy,
I viewed a livecast this afternoon:
http://www.spreecast.com/events/adobes-big-decision

It is fairly certain that Adobe will be revising their stance, not in the form of providing CS7 or later upgrades other than thru the Creative Cloud (CC) but as tailored packages (PS + LR, etc.) at a reduced price for those who do not need/use/want the entire suite of Adobe products.



I sure hope they change their stance. I currently use Lightroom 4 as a front end and PS Elements 11 as a back end when I need it. The two together cost me around $150 to own. I sure wouldn't spend $50 every month to accomplish the same thing.
Go to
May 12, 2013 12:01:48   #
joe r.v. wrote:
What camera do you have....? I have the Canon Rebel 400D Ti and the Canon Rebel T3i both with the AF switch as someone explained before AF is autofocus . MF manual...I tried both works well. :roll: JRV


Please see my note just above. Its a different button on the camera back of more advanced EOS cameras. On Rebel line the "*" button can be configured for that purpose
Go to
May 12, 2013 11:58:49   #
PhotoGator wrote:
On my Canon T3i/600D:
AF stands for Auto Focus.
It is not a buttom, it is a switch, ON/OFF.
AF ON the camera does the Focusing.
AF OFF = M = Manual, user does the Focusing.


On more advanced Canon bodies there is a separate AF-On button on the back of the body which can be be configured in C.Fn IV, Operation/Others. It can be used to separate auto focus from metering, among other things. It's especially useful for those with lenses that have FTMF (full time manual focus) and like to go back and forth between manual and AF without the need for constantly switching that feature off and on using the lens switch. It can also be set on the lcd screen use the "Q" button and changing the "custom controls" feature. I'm not sure if all the Rebels can be modified to do this using the "Q" button.

This is generally referred to as back button focusing, which others have also described. I use it all the time since with some of my lenses I use manual focus a lot. Its also useful for recomposing. When set up my camera, the 60D, the shutter button only controls metering rather than metering and AF. The same feature is available on your body, but requires setting up the "*" button on the back of your camera for that purpose.
Go to
May 9, 2013 10:44:28   #
ProfJoe wrote:
I just purchased a D7100 camera. The issue I have is when I download an image and check the properties in my editing software the focal length in 35 mm film is inaccurate. For example if I use the Nikon 70-300 vr at 70mm it indicates 70mm in 35 mm focal length when it should be 105 mm. I tried it at 300 mm and still got a reading of 300 mm instead of 450 mm. I switched to the 1.3 DX at 300 mm and got a reading of 600 mm for a 35 mm conversion (should be 585?). I shot with a Sigma 17-50 OS and had the same problem.I never had this problem with my D7000. I use Photoshop Elements 11 or Picasa for editing. Any advice would be appreciated.
I just purchased a D7100 camera. The issue I have ... (show quote)


The reason your editing software indicates 70mm is because that is the focal length you use to capture it. Focal length does not change because the lens is on a camera with a crop sensor. What changes on a crop body is the size of the image circle, which is smaller than on a full frame. The angle of view on a crop at 70 mm will give you a result that LOOKS similar to a photo taken at 105mm on a full frame body, but the focal length has not changed. You software is reporting the focal length correctly.

While this is may not be a great analogy, think about manually cropping an image on your computer. The result when viewed at the same size will look like you're much closer but you haven't altered the focal length.

People focus way too much on the crop factor. Unless you are going back and forth between full frame and crop sensor bodies a lot, you can generally ignore it. The important thing to take away is that you took the picture at 70mm not 105mm.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 1063 1064 1065 1066
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.