Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: radiojohn
Page: <<prev 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... 67 next>>
Oct 24, 2023 14:33:54   #
----------------------------------------------

Ive got the makings of the digital version already on hand, so "on hand" will be my equivalent of "old cheap used" stuff:
• 12MP nonSLR body
• Adapter for snapshot lens
• Slow wide lens with crude clickstops for Close, Less Close, and Further Away
• Not overly accurate, shoe-mounted, peepsight finder is optional[/quote]

Yeah, I have an Oly P1 and a fixed 12mm (I think) pancake lens.
Go to
Oct 24, 2023 10:26:26   #
StanMac wrote:
For some strange reason, I like those “crap” images you’re getting with your phone.

Stan


That's the "LOMO" effect...less than perfect, but visually interesting. A bit anti-technology.

It does beg the question that, with improved larger resolution and in-camera processing, would a modern fixed focus slightly wide angle "box camera" be fun to use?

Too bad there is no market for one!
Go to
Oct 23, 2023 20:17:54   #
For what it is worth, the first article I wrote for Shutterbug was about a "digital box camera": a one MP Kodak that did not zoom, was fixed focus and not much more. A photo I took with was printed in the magazine, unlike the many 640x480 cameras of that time. I used it on the NYE of 2000! It was that long ago!

The ONLY display of my shots ever was a gallery-type display in Taiwan, taken with another 5 MP "Papershoot" camera from Taiwan. Maybe I'm really a box camera kinda guy.
Go to
Oct 23, 2023 17:57:37   #
Here are two more. Same cheap camera.




Go to
Oct 23, 2023 12:57:52   #
Somewhere far below cameras most of us use and those wretched "toy" cameras for kids found on Amazon are basically Chinese "sucker" cameras touted as 48 MP, V-Logger 4K, "powerful zoom" etc.

In reality, these are weighted-down plastic cameras, usually 5 MP fixed focus with digital zoom and grossly over-interpolated settings to give the illusion of better resolution.

I wondered why they went to so much effort, just like some of the "promotional" film cameras with film-winding, etc, but wretched single element lenses.

It appears they are using modules from outdated smartphones!

I never buy these new for the outrageous prices asked, but find them for $10 used.
Early models had all kinds of effects, including LOMO, Dog Eye, Japan Look and more. My latest loses these but includes a mic input!

Here is a sample photo, with increased saturation and contrast. Basically a box camera for the artsy set who us Dianas and Lomography products. Feel free to heap on all the scorn you want.


(Download)
Go to
Oct 17, 2023 21:39:30   #
Mac wrote:
https://www.wired.com/story/leica-m11-digital-rangefinder/


A $9,000 camera. Haven't won the lottery yet.
Go to
Oct 17, 2023 21:31:14   #
As a person long involved in journalism, IMHO they were trying to be "clever." It is a crappy misleading headline.
Go to
Oct 9, 2023 12:09:32   #
Thanks for the list.

I listened to a lot of Top 40 stuff on an AM radio in high school. Years later I played a lot of "middle of the road" music as a radio DJ.

All time favorite: Pictures of Matchstick Man [never got to play it!]
Camper Van Beethoven version is also great.

Silly song that outlasted the 60's: Judy In Disguise! [Never Got To Play it!]

Proudest song I ever played: Neil Diamond: "Coming To America." (From The Jazz Singer.) I was on all night radio in Milwaukee the night the Iranian hostages were finally released. The minute they were out of Iranian airspace I blasted it out! "Freedom's light burning warm."
Go to
Oct 8, 2023 23:35:24   #
BobSchwabk wrote:
What makes an image "fine Art"?


A friend once quipped, "The only difference between art and exercise is the frame."
Go to
Oct 1, 2023 13:59:59   #
A surprising number of free apps have also been "portabled" so they can run without getting mixed into the OS. They can even run off a USB stick, etc. portableapps.com
Go to
Sep 30, 2023 13:38:55   #
lightyear wrote:
It is unenforceable on public property ( sidewalks, street, etc.).


I believe it is clear it is aimed at a street photographer engaged in the business of offering to take photos for $$.
Go to
Sep 25, 2023 11:43:25   #
Apophasis wrote:
I still shoot 95% film. In 35mm, I shoot Nikon, Canon, and Leica. Some of the old best lenses from these manufacturers still seem great to me, but I do not know the other side. Those of you that have used the best of the manual lenses mounted on digital cameras, how do they compare? I would be especially interested reports on the cheaper old lens that are surprisingly great (IMHO): Nikon E AIS 50mm 1.8, Nikon 135mm 3.5 AIS etc.

Thanks.


Adapters are pretty cheap. Best to just try and see of you like it.
Go to
Sep 18, 2023 11:20:19   #
Last used on a Polaroid Swinger circa 1965.
Go to
Sep 18, 2023 11:18:30   #
Longshadow wrote:
If I knew what they were I might be able to answer your question.


Extinction meters. Zero electronics. Highly dependent on your perception of shades of gray.
Go to
Sep 14, 2023 11:43:10   #
delder wrote:
I agree!

I personally feel there would be SOME market for a true SMARTPHONE/PRO CAMERA combination with Interchangeable/Pancake lens & physically larger sensors.
Is a viewfinder too much to ask for?

Any votes?


Might be easier just to wedge a phone into an existing camera design!
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... 67 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.