amfoto1 wrote:
No, there really aren't.
The Canon EF 600mm f/4L IS USM II not only costs $11,500, it's also almost 18" long (without the coffee-can-size lens hood), 6.5" in diameter with a front element around 150mm (so it uses 52mm rear drop in filters) and weighs in at a rather hefty 8.5 lb. Most folks would use it most of the time on a good, sturdy tripod (add another 7 to 9 lb. and $1000 to $1500 for that), but a hefty monopod might serve for shorter duration.
About the lightest lens that reaches 600mm is $1500 Tamron 150-600mm G2, which is over 10 inches long (retracted and w/o hood), uses a 95mm diameter filter and weighs about 4.5 lb.
Canon 100-400mm IS USM II is a little bit smaller and lighter, but only gets to 400mm. It's sharper, faster focusing, very close focusing and better built... but costs $2000 and still weighs in about 3.5 lb. (about 7.5" long retracted and w/o hood, a little under 4" diameter). If your camera is "f/8 capable" (7DII, 5DIII or later, 80D, 1D-series), it is usable and will still be able to autofocus with a 1.4X teleconverter to make for a 140-560mm combo.
A little lighter still at about 2.75 lb., the Canon EF 400mm f/5.6L USM is also very sharp and fast focusing. At about $1150, it's 3.5" diameter and about 10" long (built-in hood retracted). The only problem is that this lens doesn't have image stabilization... so you might also need to carry a tripod or at least a monopod. It can be used with a quality 1.4X teleconverter, too... but the 560mm combo also would need to be on an f/8 camera... and will be challenging to hold steady (i.e.... an even greater need for a tripod or at least a monopod).
About the same weight at around 2.65 lb., the Canon EF 300mm f/4L IS USM does have image stabilization and is my "go to" handheld, long lens. I also often use it with 1.4X teleconverter, to make for a 420mm f/5.6 with stabilization. Image quality with the TC is only slightly compromised.... not as sharp as the 400/5.6 without TC. But for handheld shooting (or monopod, which I sometimes use with it) I'd rather have IS. I use the Canon 1.4X II with it (not the latest and greatest III). I do not use it with a 2X, due to too much loss of image quality plus the limitations of an effective f/8 combo. On an APS-C camera, a 300mm lens or 420mm lens/TC combo makes for a pretty darned long lens!
There are some "mirror" or catadioptric lenses in the 500mm and 600mm range that are reasonably small and lightweight. Nearly all have fixed f/8 or f/11 aperture and are manual focus only. I've used a number of "cat" lenses over the years and think the Tamron SP 500mm f/8 is one of the best. It's an Adaptall-2 lens, with interchangeable lens mount (EOS/EF Adaptall and many other system mounts are widely available, made in China and relatively inexpensive, even though the Tamron Adaptall lenses were discontinued in the 1990s). This lens can be found used for around $200. If you buy a Tamron 500mm that way, look for one that still has the originally included tripod mounting ring and lens hood, as those items are difficult to replace if they've been removed and lost. There's no image stabilization on any mirror lens and it can be difficult to hold such long focal length, lightweight lenses steady. I mostly used my Tamron 500mm on at least a monopod and feel the tripod ring, in particular, is absolutely essential. (The lens also came with a set of 30.5mm filters including at least one neutral density to "stop down" the lens... but if the filters aren't included, it's not a problem to find and buy them. It also has 82mm front filter thread that can be used instead, if wanted.)
Once again, these cat lenses are manual focus only... and at f/8 your viewfinder will be dimmed down, making is a bit more difficult. Live View and Exposure Simulation might be useful, but that's mostly limited to stationary/cooperative subjects.
Hope this helps!
No, there really aren't. br br The Canon EF 600m... (
show quote)
Great response!! Obviusly more knowledgable than I on this subject.