Posts: Longshadow | Ugly Hedgehog

Apr 25, 2024 11:33:45 #

selmslie wrote:

The point is to not zoom in. That way you will see all of the images at the same size, regardless of pixel density, as they would appear on a print.

Incidentally, I also viewed all of the images on my 4k monitor. When the images fill the screen (or at their default rendition) they are all the same size.

My point was I see no difference.......

Cruising around and through Europe Part 53: Lake Como part 5

Apr 25, 2024 10:45:35 #

(Photo Gallery)

Apr 25, 2024 10:19:01 #

burkphoto wrote:

So would I, and I'd never return to a landline or a dumb mobile phone.

Yup, Smart Phones are so versatile.

(General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk))

Apr 25, 2024 10:17:07 #

Fantastic AI

bobbyjohn wrote:

I kinda like it. Very interesting technology, notwithstanding the problems caused by a good AI application. I would imagine that this VASA ain't gonna be free. Wonder how much the Microsoft "gods" are gonna charge?

I'm wondering how it will be misused.....

Apr 25, 2024 09:56:04 #

burkphoto wrote:

As a kid, I remember asking my parents what people did BTP — before toilet paper. My kids once asked me what we did BISP — before Internet and smartphones.

I'd rather use TP....

Apr 25, 2024 09:54:38 #

selmslie wrote:

Here is an example using a color image. The difference (the devil) is in the detail.

The reason for the difference is that the original 24MP image uses each RGB pixel from the raster image to create a single JPEG pixel for the 24MP JPEG. When going from 6000 pixels wide to about 2000, each JPEG pixels is now built from about 9 pixels (3x3). This necessarily changes the level of detail, the clarity and the apparent sharpness.

It is impossible to avoid a difference.

I must have a "substandard" monitor as I see no difference flipping between them.
Now zooming in, one gets further into the image on one.
But I hardly zoom in to images, I look at the image as presented,
like if it was printed.

Apr 25, 2024 09:26:23 #

dmeyer wrote:

Oddly enough, I never have my cameras in my vehicle--only when I am traveling specifically for photography. That's why the phone camera has been a lot of fun to have handy...like driving home into a beautiful sunset.

Ditto.

Apr 25, 2024 08:53:26 #

selmslie wrote:

It's the brightness change that might be troublesome. It changes the character of the image.

After resizing, it's not the same as the image I edited and the print looks different.

That's because you know what you are looking for.
A person viewing a single image would have no idea of any difference..

Apr 25, 2024 08:40:35 #

dmeyer wrote:

Totally agree. While the phone is an unexpectedly nice backup, the decision to leave APS-C and go full frame was a deliberate change to get better detail in landscape work. (Yep, I am a pixel peeper when editing.)

I definitely use my phone as backup.
Especially since my main camera isn't glued to my hand.
And for panos.

Apr 25, 2024 08:33:58 #

I put each image in its own tab and kept flipping between them.
Other than a slight brightness change between them, nothing worth being concerned with for me.
Either as a "stand-alone" image would be fine.

Apr 25, 2024 08:14:26 #