-18 degrees F in US Army class A uniform (no ear muffs)

[quote=kufengler]The front and rear are different sizes on many cars.
why is this here in this thread?

Technology focused car companies are researching other fuels, e.g., Porsche has a pilot plant going in SA for synthetic gasoline which has the potential to be carbon neutral. The current problem is that the EV sector is "sucking the oxygen" out of the research that could be applied to the search for alternative fuels. And let's not forget the jet stream. Achieving air quality improvements requires cooperation from all countries, the chief polluter of which is China.

My wife and I bought e-bikes and went through a lot to store the batteries over the winter. The bike mfr. posted a list of dos and don'ts about storage in the off season.

sorry, the name of the company that processes B/W. They return prints, negatives and digital on a CD; at least that was the package the last time I sent film for processing.

I use the DARKROOM in Ca.

I might be off base here, but after seeing both prints and negatives that my dad shot over 100 years ago, I remain impressed with the quality and durability of these. I shoot a roll of B/W film now and then and hope my grandchildren can have the same experience long after I'm gone and laugh at their faces 75 years from now.

highly dubious:(

I'd like to know too. Many here will help you spend money that's not theirs. I'd like to learn if I can about an accidental purchase of this magnitude.

Matt, I use the D850 and D500 with the 200-500 f5.6 lens and am satisfied with the results. It's a heavy bugger but prices are coming down. Nikon has refurbs for about $1095. I'm sure used excellent condition examples from highly rated sellers on Ebay are considerably less. The MILC adapter will add a few oz. and cause the set up to be bulkier. As usual for many of us, budget is a consideration.

It comes down to what OP expects the camera to do for his photography. Since I have other bodies, the D5600 serves as a "snapshot" choice with built-in flash, light weight and interchangeable lens capability and can shoot jpeg and RAW in case I capture anything really awesome.

[quote=jerryc41]We've all heard about people saying, "You must have an expensive camera to take such good pictures." Although people have complimented my pictures, they never mentioned the camera. Maybe that quotation is just an urban legend.

Actually it was "she who must be obeyed" who said, that's an expensive camera. The pictures better be good!

OP: I think it important to look at the specs as best you can and compare to your list of requirements and desires. The D7000 series is 7.5 oz heavier that the D5600. The lenses may or may not be lighter. If you start with only a few lenses for the D5600 to see what you really like; you won't need to buy many to get a feel for the body. And you can buy used kt lenses for very little money to determine what you like. I think many people expect a person to look forward to an MILC body as the future. I had one and sold it for a variety of reasons one of which was the adapter which made the camera feel awkward, that and the MILC bodies are more expensive. If you don't have a large investment in DSLR lenses then the adapter issue is less important.
If I were "at the starting gate", I'd start small and slowly and carefully select a few lenses. In my case, once I got heavily invested in DSLR glass, the idea of migrating to MILC became less and less tempting. To me, having a camera that feels comfortable and does what I want it to do is a major criteria for me. Your's is a personal preference decision.
PS: depending upon your use, the tilt and swivel rear screen was a real plus for me.

I have had and used both the D5300 and the D5600 and liked them both. Recently the D 5300 came back from my son (who uses his I Phone) and have been pleasantly surprised at how light and handy it is. Unless you need the capabilities of higher end Nikons (D500, D850) then you could find the D5600 to serve most of your needs.