OR you could pay attention to real scientists that actually know what they are talking about:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l90FpjPGLBE&list=PLDv6QYctpfeFs7AVcVNLja6ePOFC1Yfxz&index=5

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7LVSrTZDopM&list=PLDv6QYctpfeFs7AVcVNLja6ePOFC1Yfxz

There are a BUNCH of real scientists you can look up that dispute the f**e scientists like Bill Nye the Science Guy.

Gates has no clue.
OS/2 was 100% reliable 30 years ago. It was windows that worked, plus a LOT more. Also, UNIX has be reliable since god invented it. Gates and his windows crap set the world of computing back 100 years.

Excellent!
Your owl family is making a lot of mice unhappy I bet...
Wish they were around here eating some of the Chipmunks eating our plant seeds and roots.

Yes, if by Satan you mean Bill Gates.
I've been thanking Gates since the early 1980's.

Anyway, I've been having intermittent problems with my mouse jerking around, and occasional computer stalls and slowdowns. I bought a new USB hub that you, or someone reading your posts on USB problems suggested (Atolla 11 Port Powered USB 3.0 Hub - $27.) It has 7 ports and 4 charging ports. I removed all my USB plugs from my PC and plugged them into the hub and WALA, all those issues went away.

I know you have a bunch of USB ports and may have had jumpy mouse issues as well.
This USB hub solved my issues completely.

You want the most popular topic on this forum to die?

Not likely to happen.

If YOU are not interested in a topic, Raw, birds, flowers whatever, I suggest you simply skip participating in those topics.

You also can start a topic you are interested and hope others will be interested and participate.

No interest = No participation
High interest = High participation

That's how it works.

My View:

(Download)

I've never had success with digital zoom on any camera, especially cell phones. Same with zooming in on any picture past 100%.

I was a senior in HS and in English Lit class. They made the announcement over the PA I think. We were told at the same time we had the next day off. We didn't care a lot about the shooting, a little in that a president was killed. We were pretty happy to have a day off though.

No one needed counseling other than possibly for being a bit crass. But in those days, that was pretty much expected from teens.

Lots of folks make up stuff that was never said and then present arguments why what was never said is wrong. His was a classic example of the strawman argument. It was so blatantly off the mark I couldn't let it go, even though I knew you could handle it w/o my interjection.

Not to worry. Fusion reactors have been just "30 years away" since 1920 when the idea was first envisioned. At our age, not likely a problem. For our grandkids, probably 30 years away when they get old as well.

Not sure what you mean by "it's a final product" You can edit jpgs all day long to get to the "final product."

No one with an ounce of jpg editing experience would routinely overwrite the original jpg file. All major jpg editors have the option to save the edited jpg and it's edits as a lossless developer file (.PSD, .afphoto, .acdc etc.) so your point here is rather moot.

NOTHING not to like about this one.
Lighting perfect, noise perfect, pose perfect.

You should be getting more volunteers I'd think...

What he said was:
"This discussion has brought out the elitists who think RAW is the where-all and end-all and is what everyone should shoot if they aren't stupid."

Your comment was preposterous and not close to what was said.

I've subscribed to Simon's video's for a while, and pretty much agree with everything he says. He's a good photographer and has lots of good advice, with good video and delivery. As far as RAW vs JPG, neither is wrong. All depends on a LOT of individual issues.