Picking a picture-taker for the Princess: D5600 v D7200
Mar 19, 2019 11:59:58 #
Mar 19, 2019 13:01:23 #
I don't mean to confuse this any more than it already has but I have an inexpensive option for you. I have a d5100 and have been thinking of upgrading. I purchased the camera new about 2 years ago. I also have a 55-200 Nikor lens that I don't use anymore. Awesome camera there are NO issues with either. If interested just let me know. I would be asking around $175.00 for both together. Might be a great starter option.
Mar 19, 2019 17:47:47 #
The Nikon D3xxx and D5xxx series cameras have a pentamirror viewfinder. If you go to a D7xxx or above Nikon, you get a superior pentaprism viewfinder. The glass prism inside gives a larger, slightly brighter view through the viewfinder.
The D5600 and D7200 have virtually indentical low light performance.
The D5600 has the Nikon Multi-CAM 4800DX autofocus sensor module (no autofocus points are rated to work with an f/8 maximum aperture).
The D7200 has the Nikon Advanced Multi-CAM 3500 II autofocus sensor module (center autofocus point rated to work with an f/8 maximum aperture).
The D5600 and D7200 have virtually indentical low light performance.
The D5600 has the Nikon Multi-CAM 4800DX autofocus sensor module (no autofocus points are rated to work with an f/8 maximum aperture).
The D7200 has the Nikon Advanced Multi-CAM 3500 II autofocus sensor module (center autofocus point rated to work with an f/8 maximum aperture).
Mar 19, 2019 22:37:20 #
I'd say go with the D7200. I did. The 5XXX series cameras are good as far as they go, but are intro level items. The D7200 is a more capable 'Enthusiast' level semi-pro, 'Prosumer' item which many pros do use, as do many amateurs. The D7200 is better in low light than are the D5XXX cameras.
Mar 20, 2019 06:13:54 #
Mar 20, 2019 06:34:16 #
david vt
Loc: Vermont
Cannot comment on the D5600 vs the D7200. Based on others, the two very relevant points by other above might be
A) articulating screen. Depends on how much your wife wants to get down low to eye level
B) use of your FF lens. This would give her more flexibility. That said, I can see the scenario where you purposefully don’t do that - sorry honey. :)
I do think the advice to perhaps go to something that would fit into a pocket or purse valueable. It will encourage her to have it with her at all times. The picture quality of many of the newer models is outstanding. That said, I recently was playing tourist and had both my iPhone and a compact p&s. The iPhone, a 3 year old model, one for good quality and sheer convenience.
Final thought. If you want to just try, note that there is a used D5200 with lens for sale for under $1000 listed today. Not recommending, but pointing out an option....
A) articulating screen. Depends on how much your wife wants to get down low to eye level
B) use of your FF lens. This would give her more flexibility. That said, I can see the scenario where you purposefully don’t do that - sorry honey. :)
I do think the advice to perhaps go to something that would fit into a pocket or purse valueable. It will encourage her to have it with her at all times. The picture quality of many of the newer models is outstanding. That said, I recently was playing tourist and had both my iPhone and a compact p&s. The iPhone, a 3 year old model, one for good quality and sheer convenience.
Final thought. If you want to just try, note that there is a used D5200 with lens for sale for under $1000 listed today. Not recommending, but pointing out an option....
Mar 20, 2019 06:55:35 #
Probably the D5600 due to its lighter weight and fully articulated touch screen. Kids love to touch screens.
Mar 20, 2019 06:58:40 #
The D5600 has a touchscreen like a phone, articulating screen, and is smaller and lighter than the D7200. I think your wife would just enjoy it more. I have the D5500, which I LOVE and use when photographing newborns and little kids. It have no problem at all capturing fast moving little ones and they are not so intimidated by such a small camera. Compared to the 5500, the 7200 felt like a monster in my hand and not so portable and versatile. Which would your wife be more likely to grab when you're not home and she sees little one doing something cute? Or take along on a trip to the park? Compare prices on the D5600 and D5500.
Mar 20, 2019 07:04:10 #
billnikon
Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
nikonnate wrote:
Hey everybody br br I did a search on the topic (... (show quote)
Right now you can get the D7200 for a song. That would be what I would do.
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1127271-REG/nikon_1554_d7200_dslr_camera_body.html?sts=pi
Mar 20, 2019 07:11:35 #
The D7200 has a better autofocus module. It would do a little better with lower light situations.
Mar 20, 2019 07:19:56 #
I would recommend describing the features and pros and cons to the photographer WHO WILL BE USING THE CAMERA and let her make the decision.
Mar 20, 2019 07:29:21 #
rjaywallace wrote:
Not wanting to confuse things further, you might want to take a look at the Nikon D3500 as an introduction to the DSLR world priced below $400.
https://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/nikon-d3500/nikon-d3500-conclusion.htm
https://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/nikon-d3500/nikon-d3500-conclusion.htm
I agree with Ray. It’s much lighter than the others mentioned and takes great images. I used my niece’s D3300 and was blown away by image quality and ease of use. For $400 you can’t go wrong.
Mar 20, 2019 08:04:40 #
mizzee
Loc: Boston,Ma
I would suggest the 7200 or the Sony with an adapter so she can use your lenses. The d5xxx series are more limited in terms of the lenses they can use. A fully articulated screen is a good thing...
Mar 20, 2019 08:05:12 #
Mar 20, 2019 08:20:45 #
Would setting your present camera on "auto" solve the issue? Far less expensive than a new outfit.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.