pendennis wrote:
No. Please don't deflect.
As I wrote in my post, the odds of finding human fossils is very unlikely. Most fossils are found in areas which were flooded at one time, instantly buried, or buried by other hominids. When bones lie out in the open, they're likely carried off, wind blown, or buried in subsequent movement of earth.
You're too far stuck on Creationism to have an open mind about evolution.
That's rich.
This whole thread illustrates that all have their bias' and cling to them with all of their might.
The real question isn't "who's biased" but "who's bias' are worth holding and who's don't make the cut logically speaking?
Quote:
Creationism requires a belief in sky hooks; that is that some omnipotent being created man as he exists today, and that everything else was filled in from the top down. There is DNA evidence that chimpanzees and humans descended from a common ancestor. DNA between both species has 96% in common.
If you mean that God created men who are "generally speaking" the same as their are today (not an apelike creature) then yes...that's true.
As for the "evidence" I'll say it again and again and again...what do we see in the present?
That humans and chimps share a large amount of DNA.
That's a fact.
What ISN'T a fact is the question: "What does that mean?"
We come to opposite conclusions based on our presuppositions.
Quote:
Evolution happens, in some instances, very quickly.
If you mean "change within kinds" or "adaptation" then yes! That's observable science...not to be confused with the fairy tale of molecules-to-men evolution.
No change has ever been observed to add information to the DNA of an organism. Never. Not once.
That's REQUIRED if you want molecules-to-man evolution.
In fact, mutations either remove information or just re-arrange what's already there. Never has any mutation ever been observed to add information.
Evolution isn't science...it's anti-science.
Quote:
When people are treated for cancer, they're often treated with chemical and radio therapies. Ever wonder why? The DNA in cancer cells mutates when threatened by the radiation and drugs. That's evolution at its most basic.
No...it's a reaction in the present that you ASSUME to be a mechanism to drive the fairy tale of molecules-to-men evolution.
Quote:
Bacteria are the same. It's one reason why antibiotics lose their effectiveness relatively quickly. DNA mutates to survive and pass along its traits.
Evolution starts from the ground up. It's exactly the same way buildings are constructed and roads are built.
The vast weight of scientific evidence points to evolution. It's up to the Creationists to prove the factual existence of a "god", not relying on an article(s) of faith.
Don't conflate change and adaption within kinds with the fairy tale you believe....they aren't the same.
As for the proof of God's existence?
No problem.
The proof that God exists is that without presupposing God nobody could prove anything.
You may not like that...you may not believe that's true but that's beside the point...that's a perfect argument for God's existence. Unanswerable.