Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
True Macro-Photography Forum
Extension tube help!
Page <prev 2 of 2
Oct 3, 2018 19:00:48   #
imagemeister Loc: mid east Florida
 
imagemeister wrote:
Maybe in your link you should talk about the differences in internal reflections between bellows and tubes and the dangers of these reflections ?

..


The only lens I have ever reversed was a 100mm Zeiss macro Planar - on a precision 8X10 bellows camera for 10:1 magnification. We then mounted a pellicle mirror in front of the lens' rear element so we could get coaxial illumination to the subject (large scale integrated circuits). The guy I worked with had a degree from RIT.

..

Reply
Oct 10, 2018 22:16:20   #
enygy Loc: LI, NY
 
Following up on all the great suggestions.

A few days ago, my wife happened to show me an old black velvet bag she was throwing away. I quickly grabbed it and used it to line all the internal surfaces of the extension tubes and reversing rings. I cut the velvet to size, then used double-sided tape to stick it to the inside of the tubes.

Voila! no more glare...at least non I have been able to create so far. I have shot up to 2.3:1 with a reversed 50mm and full tubes. The images seem quite sharp, although DOF, focus, and exposure are a challenge at the higher magnifications.

I will post any decent ones I get before winter sets in.

Thanks again everyone!

Reply
Jan 26, 2019 22:33:29   #
newtoyou Loc: Eastport
 
I used a piece of black construction paper in a roll inside to stop this. Also try a good quality black plastic electrician tape at joints. DO NOT LEAVE TAPE IN PLACE OVER ONE DAY.
And, if you like the results, buy a better set.
Bill

Reply
 
 
Jan 26, 2019 22:41:07   #
newtoyou Loc: Eastport
 
enygy wrote:
Not scientific but I put a bit of light absorbant material in the 28mm extension tube and took some shots with a reversed 50mm lens.

The shots with the reversed lens and tube regularly show a haze, although it is sometimes less obvious.
The reversed lens by itself can be very sharp and clear. I'll put a couple of other images in another post.

My guess is the problem is the extra light bouncing around between the lens and the sensor. With the tube, less of the light transmitted by the lens hits the sensor, ie more bounces around inside. As Nikonian72 pointed out, the reversed lens is not designed for this use and so probably lacks adequate baffles etc, letting in more stray light than the system can handle.

The inside of the extension tube was not completely covered by the absorbant material, I am going to try to cover as much of the surface as possible with either flat black paint or something else to see if that helps.

Summarizing - its not light leak, and its not the reversed lens itself.

Thanks all for the advice!
Not scientific but I put a bit of light absorbant ... (show quote)

AHH, NO PAINT, POSSIBLE VAPORS, A GAMBLE. You would have to wait till NO smell, and then??? My opinion. Overcautious?, maybe.
Bill

Reply
Jan 26, 2019 23:05:26   #
Mark Sturtevant Loc: Grand Blanc, MI
 
This is an old thread. Anyway, problem seems solved. Good job, everybody! 👍🏽

Reply
Jan 26, 2019 23:54:18   #
newtoyou Loc: Eastport
 
Mark Sturtevant wrote:
This is an old thread. Anyway, problem seems solved. Good job, everybody! 👍🏽


History repeated itself. I had the problem, you and Brenda pointed the way to a solution.
Bill

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
True Macro-Photography Forum
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.