Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Considering a 10-24 mm Nikor
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
Jan 20, 2019 18:31:51   #
IDguy Loc: Idaho
 
amfoto1 wrote:
OP mentions using an 18-55mm lens now... which is only available in DX/crop sensor design.

Plus the Nikkor 10-24mm they're asking about is also a DX lens.

It's pretty safe to assume they have a crop-sensor camera.


The OP said he has a D7100.

Reply
Jan 20, 2019 18:34:19   #
Dan Mc Loc: NM
 
Been satisfied with the less expensive but quite capable Sigma 10-20....sharp and light.

Reply
Jan 20, 2019 19:45:07   #
IDguy Loc: Idaho
 
Dan Mc wrote:
Been satisfied with the less expensive but quite capable Sigma 10-20....sharp and light.


I think the Nikon AF-P 10-20 is cheaper. And it has VR.

Reply
 
 
Jan 20, 2019 23:04:31   #
Mike D. Loc: Crowley County, CO.
 
Thanks for the feedback Bill, the distortions involved with this lens are tolerable and can even be used to somewhat of a creative advantage.

I have the distortion control set up for the other three lenses so the 10-24 will also be set up when it arrives. Thanks again for the tips they are greatly appreciated.

Reply
Jan 20, 2019 23:07:17   #
Mike D. Loc: Crowley County, CO.
 
aweisbach wrote:
I have been using that lens almost daily, for shooting real estate, for several years, and highly recommend it. Yes, there's some barrel distortion, but it can be corrected fairly easily. The extra 4 mm on the long end, compared to the less expensive 10-20mn, helps with view type shots, usually allowing me to shoot the entire job with the one lens.

I previously used the Tamron version of that lens and had issues with lens flair. When I switched to the Nikor lens I was pleasantly surprised to find that not only did it handle flair better, but contrast and saturation are noticeably better as well.
I have been using that lens almost daily, for shoo... (show quote)


I appreciate the feedback.

Reply
Jan 20, 2019 23:09:43   #
Mike D. Loc: Crowley County, CO.
 
IDguy wrote:
I think the Nikon AF-P 10-20 is cheaper. And it has VR.


Thanks Dan. While at work today my wife ordered a Nikkor 10-24 f/3.5 so we shall see.

Reply
Jan 21, 2019 07:25:28   #
billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
 
Mike D. wrote:
Thanks for the feedback Bill, the distortions involved with this lens are tolerable and can even be used to somewhat of a creative advantage.

I have the distortion control set up for the other three lenses so the 10-24 will also be set up when it arrives. Thanks again for the tips they are greatly appreciated.


Glad to be of help. Good luck.

Reply
 
 
Jan 21, 2019 10:11:58   #
Boris Ekner Loc: From Sweden, living in Guatemala
 
Mike D. wrote:
I would appreciate feedback from those who have one and how often it gets used.

My goal is something a skosh wider than 18-55 for landscapes and architectural shots.


Tokina 11-20mm f/2.8.

https://www.lenstip.com/index.html?test=obiektywu&test_ob=451

Reply
Jan 22, 2019 22:12:58   #
Mike D. Loc: Crowley County, CO.
 


Thanks Boris!

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.