newtoyou wrote:
Since there is some interest in pinhole imaging, some suggestions. Lens caps with precision pinholes available on eBay for about ten dollars. The book Pinhole Photography by Eric Renner is a must read if you want to get deep into this. Excellent book on light in art.
Bill
Eric Renner and his artist wife own and operate The Pinhole Resource. Eric authored the book, Pinhole Photography, get the second edition, it has some new additional insights into the world of pinhole images. Eric is an extremely gifted person, warm and friendly, he takes pinhole quite seriously. Eric is scholarly, yet not stuffy.
Eric and photographers like him are the reason for the evolving schism between the art elitist who now want to bring photography into the fold of Modern Art. It is a joke they manner in which photography is 'handled' by the elitist arts snobs. To photograph it boils down to photography does not need The Arts, That Art needs photography.
In Eric's case is another case in point. David Hockney (the painter) put forth a 'thing' about painters in the Renaissance use of pinholes as an aide to producing the then new optical perspective in their paintings. Then, art historians and art critics jumped on this and all of a sudden we had a whole new understanding of perspective based imagery. Wow! Shades of genus and originality!
Photography workers had put this concept forward decades before Hockney and the art elitists. More over, many of the critical ideas, objects and concepts of how and why the pinhole and optical devices were responsible for transforming the art worlds basic structures. Eric Renner's book would help move loads of different understandings of subjects like architecture, astronomical alignments and many others fascinating concepts. To think his book is merely limited to pinhole is to sell it intellectual short of much disserving attention.
A perfect example of the myopic self serving idiocy by the established arts community would be to embrace the idiotic life of the Abstract painter Jackson Pollock. He is referred to as 'Jack the Dripper' and is portrayed as a bulling, raving, anti social, alcoholic.
What Pollock was a driven obsessed visionary with a rare gift. Pollock's mind perceived the world as that of a computer, like a Mandelbrot series for information. Pollock 'saw' the world as data and then transformed that 'reality' into painted graphics. This understand of his work is confirmed by the digital in putting of many of his paintings with detailed mathematical analysis done by computer technologists. Pollock actually 'saw' reality much like a computer processes data and then converts the computers data back into a graphic representation.
This helps us to understand that Pollock cleared the distractions of human existence, dulled his emotions with the drug alcohol, all so he could enter into a world he could 'see' and could represent as marks on a canvas with cheap house paint. He saw as a computer program, gave proof of what can happen when the human mind 'sees' with a totally foreign vision.
Why is this critical? Artists are visionary travelers, that is not just some empty pronouncement. I live and embrace that world of visionary belief system. I often chuckle at the absurd pronouncements I run across on the Hog, but I also delight when I read original visionary statements from what many feel are empty muddle, they need to be told what a wonderful addition they make to the human condition as well as the human race!