I would love some input as to how I could improve on this image. I see so many wonderful b&w images here, particularly bmalarz work, and would love to apply some of those techniques to what I am doing. Be constructively critical, but be kind...
I don’t see anything wrong with this.
htbrown
Loc: San Francisco Bay Area
Technically, I see nothing wrong with this image.
Since you're posing this question, you must think it's weak in some way. Why do you think it's not as good as it might be? If you can identify what is bothering you, you're 80% of the way to fixing it. Ultimately, you're after an image that pleases you first and foremost. The best way to get from one that doesn't quite succeed to one that does is by asking what could be improved. If you can't identify what is bothering you, play with the image in post to see what improves it. Play with the crop, and see if you can make the composition stronger (that is, more to your liking.) Play with contrast, both global and local, and see if you like the results better. By doing it yourself, you'll learn what matters to you.
There are some very good photographers on this site who will be able to give you better advice than can I, but in the end, it's what you like that matters.
I find it highly appealing - serene, but with lots of details to enjoy. The conversion is really nicely done IMO. The only teensy-tiny thing that I might change is to crop a small amount of sky. That would eliminate the brightest spot at the top and move your horizon out of center. With less sky you give more visual importance to the dock and foreground.
Linda From Maine wrote:
I find it highly appealing - serene, but with lots of details to enjoy. The conversion is really nicely done IMO. The only teensy-tiny thing that I might change is to crop a small amount of sky. That would eliminate the brightest spot at the top and move your horizon out of center. With less sky you give more visual importance to the dock and foreground.
I see what you mean, Linda, and I fully agree. I didn't even see the 50% sky/land ratio, and I usually studiously try to avoid that! So may details, so little time... I also added a touch of contrast to the clouds for a slightly more ominous look...
htbrown wrote:
Technically, I see nothing wrong with this image.
Since you're posing this question, you must think it's weak in some way. Why do you think it's not as good as it might be? If you can identify what is bothering you, you're 80% of the way to fixing it. Ultimately, you're after an image that pleases you first and foremost. The best way to get from one that doesn't quite succeed to one that does is by asking what could be improved. If you can't identify what is bothering you, play with the image in post to see what improves it. Play with the crop, and see if you can make the composition stronger (that is, more to your liking.) Play with contrast, both global and local, and see if you like the results better. By doing it yourself, you'll learn what matters to you.
There are some very good photographers on this site who will be able to give you better advice than can I, but in the end, it's what you like that matters.
Technically, I see nothing wrong with this image. ... (
show quote)
Thanks, ht! I think you hit the nail on the head, and what was bugging me is that I was looking for ways to increase the contrast and the separation between the brightest and darkest parts of the image. I see a lot of grays, and not a lot of pure blacks and whites. Poor explanation, but that's what was in my mind's eye. Thanks for taking the time to post, and happy shooting!
tommystrat wrote:
......I see a lot of grays, and not a lot of pure blacks and whites......
The main difference between your shot and what rmalarz does is the amount of contrast.
Bmac
Loc: Long Island, NY
Dramatic well-composed image with a nice diagonal and good tonality. I actually prefer the expansiveness of your first edit.
tommystrat wrote:
I would love some input as to how I could improve on this image. I see so many wonderful b&w images here, particularly bmalarz work, and would love to apply some of those techniques to what I am doing. Be constructively critical, but be kind...
I looks attractive to me.
I like it a lot, and I don’t see much you could do to it, maybe increase the contrast a bit or poke around in Nik Silver Effects if you have it.
The majority of b&w images benefit from using contrast. I used a Curves Adjustment and some burning-in to improve on contrast. I am submitting the image for your consideration.
By the way, make sure that you convert your Adobe RGB images to the sRGB color space for posting and printing.
This is quite nice, and thank you for the compliment. The only thing I think I'd do to this image is just a bit of burning the darker under parts of the clouds. Perhaps a bit also in areas that are darker in order to provide just a bit more contrast to scene.
--Bob
tommystrat wrote:
I would love some input as to how I could improve on this image. I see so many wonderful b&w images here, particularly bmalarz work, and would love to apply some of those techniques to what I am doing. Be constructively critical, but be kind...
rmalarz wrote:
This is quite nice, and thank you for the compliment. The only thing I think I'd do to this image is just a bit of burning the darker under parts of the clouds. Perhaps a bit also in areas that are darker in order to provide just a bit more contrast to scene.
--Bob
Can you tell me what "burning" is? I presume that is using the Burn tool in PS? Thanks!
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.