Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
what is the difference between a snapshot and a photograph
Page <<first <prev 4 of 7 next> last>>
Nov 1, 2011 08:35:35   #
Wickspics Loc: Detroits Northwest Side. Cody High School.
 
It was back in the 90's when I first saw a F-86 saber Jet photo from AirVenture. The plane was flying very fast and very low and the detail was so well done that the aircrafts rivets were clear as well as the pilots face. A really great job of Panning the camera along with all the other things that make it a great photo, at least to me, but maybe not you. Sure hooked me and I been at it ever since.

Takes parachute team up every day of shows
Takes parachute team up every day of shows...

Reply
Nov 1, 2011 15:48:09   #
Peej Loc: Houndsfield, New York
 
When i was a kid, and yes,they had paved roads,with grandma's Brownie,the only word I ever was "get a snapshot". I realy can't when photo started being used. In high school and yes, they now have paved 2 lane roads I was photographer for varsity sportswith my Argus with a flash I was still taking snapshots with a Flash.

Reply
Nov 1, 2011 23:31:46   #
tarheel-Ron Loc: North Carolina
 
Last year on Thanksgiving day, I was taking some planned and posed "photographs" of my grandchildren in the front yard where I had some bales of hay, pumpkins etc. for a fall display. When we were finished the kids went to the backyard to play. When I went back to watch them, I walked up behind my 8 year old granddaughter who was sitting in a pile of leaves. She turned her head and looked up at me with the prettiest smile. I took a quick "snapshot".
This turned out to be the best shot of the day and a 16x20 framed print now hangs in my daughter's dining room. So whether planned or spontaneous, a really good shot deserves to be called a photograph.

Reply
 
 
Nov 2, 2011 00:30:56   #
photodaddy Loc: Missouri
 
My Grandson's 1st grandslam home run.
The second photo I just happened to have the camera pointed at him and saw a blur fly past my camera and took the shot. I guess you would call that a snap shot too. An unplanned photo. In it you can see the reflection of the baseball in his sunglasses as if speeds toward to batter.





This photo is my Grandson's first home run of the inning with his second home run a grand slam. I took all three photos in the same game. You can see the ball sailing out to right field. Both home runs were hit in same location.
This photo is my Grandson's first home run of the ...

Reply
Nov 2, 2011 01:48:47   #
Janice Loc: Kentucky
 
tarheel-Ron wrote:
Last year on Thanksgiving day, I was taking some planned and posed "photographs" of my grandchildren in the front yard where I had some bales of hay, pumpkins etc. for a fall display. When we were finished the kids went to the backyard to play. When I went back to watch them, I walked up behind my 8 year old granddaughter who was sitting in a pile of leaves. She turned her head and looked up at me with the prettiest smile. I took a quick "snapshot".
This turned out to be the best shot of the day and a 16x20 framed print now hangs in my daughter's dining room. So whether planned or spontaneous, a really good shot deserves to be called a photograph.
Last year on Thanksgiving day, I was taking some p... (show quote)


I think you are so right about that!

Reply
Nov 2, 2011 09:34:51   #
sparky192 Loc: Manitoba, Canada
 
Getting back to basics, in Collins dictionary a "photograph" is -'a picture made by the chemical action of light on a sensitive film.'
Since with digital we do not use a chemical action -per se - and with various software products we change what the lens actually saw, it is no longer a photograph. No more than the Mona Lisa or any works of a painter.
A photograph was at one time regarded as an exact rendition of a subject. I once sighted a very rare Jaguarundi in Texas, it was not an official sighting because I did not get a photograph. But I could cheat and cobble one up digitally.
Thus a digital rendition of a subject altered to change its appearance is not a photograph. It is modern art!
Sparky

Reply
Nov 2, 2011 09:40:29   #
tarheel-Ron Loc: North Carolina
 
Sometimes dictionairies have to be updated to keep up with a changing world. In my humble opinion, a digital image is just as much a photograph as those captured on film. Post-editing has long been a part of the process, whether in a darkroon or at a computer.

Reply
 
 
Nov 2, 2011 09:47:21   #
gzil Loc: San Antonio, TX
 
Just because one takes photos of their grandchildren doesn't mean that they should be classified as a snapshot, period. I follow the 12 steps to judging. If a photo falls into the majority of the 12 steps, it should certainly be classified as a photograph. This "photo" was recently chosen to 'hang' in a gallery exhibit.



Reply
Nov 2, 2011 09:56:46   #
PWhisperer Loc: Allentown, PA
 
I deal with this issue with models all the time. They go to a pro, then they shoot with an amateur then post the pix side by side on a modeling site or fb or wherever. Ugh!! Huge faux pas. For some reason they have a difficult time telling the difference. As was mentioned earlier....u should be able to glance at a pic and instantly tell if it's a snapshot or a quality photograph. Color, clarity, composition, lighting....all hallmarks of a quality image.

Reply
Nov 2, 2011 10:01:57   #
gzil Loc: San Antonio, TX
 
I agree with you if you are dealing with models, only. I deal with real life and I get quality photographs

Reply
Nov 2, 2011 10:21:38   #
PWhisperer Loc: Allentown, PA
 
A quality photograph is quality whether it's of a person or a landscape or a dog or a door knob. Most peeps simply dont have the ability to spot the diff between a snap and a quality photo. Its apparently a learned skill. I spent an hour with my student the other day teaching her how to tell them apart. There was that "aha, now I get it" moment in her mind that made me smile. As for your shots I can't comment. I havent seen them.

Reply
 
 
Nov 2, 2011 10:35:52   #
gzil Loc: San Antonio, TX
 
PWhisperer wrote:
A quality photograph is quality whether it's of a person or a landscape or a dog or a door knob. Most peeps simply dont have the ability to spot the diff between a snap and a quality photo. Its apparently a learned skill. I spent an hour with my student the other day teaching her how to tell them apart. There was that "aha, now I get it" moment in her mind that made me smile. As for your shots I can't comment. I havent seen them.


I probably won 't see yours either! Who cares.

Reply
Nov 2, 2011 10:41:24   #
sparky192 Loc: Manitoba, Canada
 
What you are saying is that it is virtually impossible to get a really fantastic photograph by accidently snapping a box camera in the general direction of a subject? ? ?BALDERDASH!

Reply
Nov 2, 2011 10:50:48   #
PWhisperer Loc: Allentown, PA
 
As u so eloquently and accurately stated it...accidents do happen ;) However, IMO the vast majority of great photos u see were not accidental.

Reply
Nov 2, 2011 10:59:09   #
MWAC Loc: Somewhere East Of Crazy
 
What I find funny is who the people that are fighting/arguing about what makes an image a photograph vs. a snapshot are, not the actual definitions. I have NEVER seen some of them offer help to the newbies trying to take their snapshots to the next level or even posted an image I would consider a "Photograph" by their own definitions.

Lots of hot air but little substance.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 7 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.