Check out Wedding Photography section of our forum.
Deciding between lenses for a dslr camera
Dec 30, 2018 06:10:53 #
Thank you. Am definitely watching out for that. I don't want an "expensive paper weight"(as a local camera shop salesperson said).
Natalie
Natalie
Dec 30, 2018 06:12:36 #
Thanks. I will definitely check on that. I didn't know other stores did that besides Best Buy.
PhotoNat
PhotoNat
Dec 30, 2018 06:13:40 #
Dec 30, 2018 06:15:58 #
Thanks everyone for all the input. Great advice I will definitely consider!
Happy New Year everyone! Mine will be Very happy when I get my hands on that new camera. I looked at the manual for it online one night,and was drooling at all it can do! LOL
PhotoNat
Happy New Year everyone! Mine will be Very happy when I get my hands on that new camera. I looked at the manual for it online one night,and was drooling at all it can do! LOL
PhotoNat
Dec 30, 2018 06:19:18 #
hj wrote:
I would avoid any bundle that includes the Canon 75-300. That lens is as the bottom of any list for quality and IQ. If you want a zoom, the 70-300 is so-o-o much better if it is the most recent nano model.
This is exactly what I would post. However it is a $600+ lens. Highly regarded for fast focus and image quality and really good stabilization. With the %dIV's noise handling ability, a stop or to push on your ISO and you shouldn't miss a shot. I've had both the I and II versions for over 20 years and really like it. Oh, and it is pretty light weight, too.
Dec 30, 2018 06:24:49 #
PhotoNat wrote:
Thank you. I have toyed with the idea of used equi... (show quote)
Research CanonUSA.com for refurbished deals. The savings will not be vry dramatic off teh retail price but the body often is discounted and you get the same 1 years as new warranty. It should save you enough money to buy part of a tripod or a VERY nice bag. BOTH are essential. OR, you could fund a few Memory Cards and extra batteries--also essential and NOT CHEAP.
Dec 30, 2018 06:52:22 #
PhotoNat wrote:
I am saving to buy my first dslr camera, and so am... (show quote)
Of those packages I would go with the 18-55mm, 70-300 mm one.
Unfortunately neither lens is really a macro.
But a small extension tube or a diopter on the front can solve that matter easily and economically. Especially the diopter as a good one will do quite well and yes I have used them frequently.
Check out Digital Artistry section of our forum.
Dec 30, 2018 08:19:41 #
I have a Canon t2i Eos Rebel. It came with the 18-55mm, which is ok. Instead of a cheaper 75-300 i went for a 55-250mm after reading reviews, which was less expensive than the 70-300 but acceptably sharp. If I were to do it over, I'd go to B&H or Canon refurb and buy body and lenses to suit my shooting style, the best within my budget. I do a lot of closeups so my 50mm f 1.8 is my go-to lens, plus it's ok for some landscapes. You want your closeup lens to be a low f-stop.
If you're on a budget, those two lenses were under $150 each used, one from Canon refurb and one from B&H.
If you're on a budget, those two lenses were under $150 each used, one from Canon refurb and one from B&H.
Dec 30, 2018 08:25:31 #
PhotoNat wrote:
I am saving to buy my first dslr camera, and so am... (show quote)
Just a suggestion: You need to click on "quote reply" under the name of the person you are replying to. That way, we know to whom you are talking when responding.
Dec 30, 2018 08:36:42 #
PhotoNat wrote:
I am saving to buy my first dslr camera, and so am... (show quote)
The Canon is a great way to start out and then grow from there. Personally I would start with the 18-55 and the 55-250mm. Stay away from the 75-300 and the 70-300mm. I own both and the image quality just isn't there for me. The 50mm is a great little lens that will take fantastic portrait shots if you get the F1.8 version. It can be boufght all day on amazon for about 125.00 dollars. Personally im not sure about the camera model you mentioned as I started with a Canon T3 and have just recently purchased a 6D Mark ii. I found after a year of shooting the T3 it was time for me to upgrade to a full frame camera. The 18-55 lens can be used for Landscape and Macro but do remember it really is a kit lens. I will include a few landscape photos I took with that lens for you. Remember this, The camera body is mainly just a tool for storing the photo, the lens is whats most important as long as you have your exposures correct. Good glass is always the best way to spend your money.
PS. STAY AWAY FROM 42ND STREET PHOTO AND BEACH CAMERA.
Dec 30, 2018 08:37:59 #
DO NOT buy bundled (inferior) “kit” lenses. DO buy a 35mm prime lenses and a 60mm or 90mm prime lens with macro capability. Then learn how to use the camera and the lenses.
Check out True Macro-Photography Forum section of our forum.
Dec 30, 2018 09:16:21 #
hj
Loc: Florida
Sorry I have to disagree with you. If you have a Canon 70-300mm and don't have good image quality then you either have a bad copy or you don't have the current 70-300 II IS USM with Nano. It is a great lens if you read all the reviews.
No way can you say the kit 18-55 and 55-250mm are better as they are kit lenses whereas the 70-300 II IS USM NANO IS not a cheaper kit lens. It retails for around $450 - $500. I agree with you to stay away from the 75-300mm lens.
No way can you say the kit 18-55 and 55-250mm are better as they are kit lenses whereas the 70-300 II IS USM NANO IS not a cheaper kit lens. It retails for around $450 - $500. I agree with you to stay away from the 75-300mm lens.
out4life2016 wrote:
The Canon is a great way to start out and then grow from there. Personally I would start with the 18-55 and the 55-250mm. Stay away from the 75-300 and the 70-300mm. I own both and the image quality just isn't there for me. .
Dec 30, 2018 09:43:56 #
PhotoNat wrote:
Jerry,
Thank you. I was noticing that when comparing the prices of the lenses with the kits, vs. buying them seperately. I was amazed at how much I could save buying with the kit!
PhotoNat
Thank you. I was noticing that when comparing the prices of the lenses with the kits, vs. buying them seperately. I was amazed at how much I could save buying with the kit!
PhotoNat
Yes but as Jerry noted, it's only a good deal if you actually want both lenses. I purchased a similar kit with the 18 - 55mm and 55 - 300mm lenses thinking I would have all situations covered. Well I did, but I found myself constantly changing lenses in the field, as I went from shooting landscape at a wide angle, to wildlife at the 300mm extension. Based on UHH advice, I purchased a Nikon 18 - 200mm lens that stays on my camera and I keep the 55 - 300mm lens in my bag in case I need that extra reach...which is very, very rare. The good advice I routinely hear from this forum, is skip the kit lenses, buy the body only, and spend some money on "good glass."
Dec 30, 2018 09:43:58 #
gvarner
Loc: Central Oregon Coast
If you’re just looking at your photos on a screen, stick with the Power Shot. If you want better quality prints, go for the Rebel. But keep the Power Shot handy when you need that 1000mm reach. 😊😊
Dec 30, 2018 11:18:49 #
nadelewitz
Loc: Ithaca NY
With an 18-55 and 55-250 you don't have a gap in focal lengths. Any of the other combos you have a 15-20mm gap between lenses.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Infrared Photography section of our forum.