Do you Want to be a Serious Photographer? Then...............
I've had a few cameras on me, but not as many as she has. I've found it was easier to have a different camera preset with different lenses ready at a moments notice. Hence my avatar. As I've had as many as 4 cameras at one time.
There are NO red rings on the lenses. Thus there are NO Canons. PLUS the strap on here shoulder says NIKON. So think again
DAN Phillips wrote:
Looks like Canon to me. Ther are no cheap or 2nd rate Nikons!
Regardless of her exposure, we know she's strong. She's also good at remembering where she put things.
I've seen that picture before.
Gene51
Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
User ID wrote:
That is a reasonable explanation. She doesn't WORK
like that, she's gathering up her remotes. I did notice
the radios on the prisms but just saw those as part of
humor of the shot. Thanks for the clarification !
.
She does have three around her neck when shooting and the rest are triggered by PocketWizards.
Gene51
Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
DAN Phillips wrote:
Looks like Canon to me. Ther are no cheap or 2nd rate Nikons!
Canon -
Can't
Afford
Nikon,
Oh [b]N]/b]o!
Nah, she's a well know photographer, and she obviously is using the right gear!
To borrow a phrase from Treasure of the Sierra Madre (or Blazing Saddles) - Canon? Canon? She is a Real Photographer - she don't need no stinkin' Canon.
https://sharonleechapmanphotography.fotomerchant.com/I dare you to say that to her face! I cannot unsee that image in my brain where you are wearing a 300mm F2.8 lens in that part of your anatomy where you sit -
Gene51
Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
RichardSM wrote:
I wonder how many times she goes to the doctor for back pain
I heard she has a live-in chiropractor.
Obviously a Nikon ad, see the perfectly placed strap? But it really does not matter if Canon or Nikon. And I'm a Canon girl myself.
Sharon is a Champ in my book. She carries more cameras than all of us own! Hedgehoggers are jealous.
I am thoroughly disgusted at all the sexism and brand elitism in these responses. I shall be reporting you all to the PC police for the proper thinking an attitude adjustments! :-))
LEGALDR wrote:
I saw this picture on the internet today and for some reason, it caught my eye. Is this photographer over or under exposed?
Those are all "walkaround" lenses
When I shot Indianapolis 500 event I used 4 cameras. A Nikon FTN w/motor and 300mmF:4.5, Nikon F2 w/MB-1 & MD-1 with a 80-200 F:4.5. Those 2 bodies carried TRI-x film, Around my neck I had 2 Nikon FM's with motors. One had a wide angle and color neg film, the other had a Nikon 180mmF:2.8 and had slide film. The two B/W cameras were used for UPI and the color cameras were for my use. I carried this load every year
I’m surprised she can stand up with all that weight hanging from her.
No second rate in that lot - old maybe.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.