These people define "deplorable"!
Dec 24, 2018 10:30:47 #
Dec 24, 2018 11:17:50 #
Spud,
There's legitimate concern about his membership and his buying into their doctrine.
Many of the extreme positions that the KofC maintain could very well come before the Court and the question is whether or not he can separate himself from those positions.
There's legitimate concern about his membership and his buying into their doctrine.
Many of the extreme positions that the KofC maintain could very well come before the Court and the question is whether or not he can separate himself from those positions.
Dec 24, 2018 11:22:20 #
Frank T wrote:
Spud,
There's legitimate concern about his membership and his buying into their doctrine.
Many of the extreme positions that the KofC maintain could very well come before the Court and the question is whether or not he can separate himself from those positions.
There's legitimate concern about his membership and his buying into their doctrine.
Many of the extreme positions that the KofC maintain could very well come before the Court and the question is whether or not he can separate himself from those positions.
Ya, like Kavanaugh, right? If Obama were doing this he'd sail through and you know it. Your problem is that by now, everyone else knows that too.
Dec 24, 2018 11:26:57 #
idaholover wrote:
Ya, like Kavanaugh, right? If Obama were doing this he'd sail through and you know it. Your problem is that by now, everyone else knows that too.
Justice Budweiser should never have been confirmed but the corrupt GOP lined up like little toy soldiers behind their demented leader.
BTW, Obama is no longer President. Maybe you should just get the f_ck over it.
Dec 24, 2018 11:41:08 #
idaholover wrote:
Ya, like Kavanaugh, right? If Obama were doing this he'd sail through and you know it. Your problem is that by now, everyone else knows that too.
Yes, would sail through under Obama just like M Garland did?????????
Dec 24, 2018 11:46:26 #
foodie65 wrote:
Yes, would sail through under Obama just like M Garland did?????????
Totally different set of circumstances.
Dec 24, 2018 11:46:44 #
idaholover wrote:
Ya, like Kavanaugh, right? If Obama were doing this he'd sail through and you know it. Your problem is that by now, everyone else knows that too.
Kavanaugh was probably a rapist but the confirmation process was not allowed to do a proper investigation because it was obvious he would not pass a no holds barred investigation.
Hopefully the investigation can be reopened and done properly!!!
SS
Dec 24, 2018 11:47:42 #
SharpShooter wrote:
Kavanaugh was probably a rapist but the confirmation process was not allowed to do a proper investigation because it was obvious he would not pass a no holds barred investigation.
Hopefully the investigation can be reopened and done properly!!!
SS
Hopefully the investigation can be reopened and done properly!!!
SS
We KNOW BC was.
Dec 24, 2018 12:08:01 #
idaholover wrote:
Maybe you should just go f_ck yourself.
Poor Spudly. Did I upset you?
Didn't know you were such a snowflake.
Dec 24, 2018 12:18:14 #
idaholover wrote:
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/harris-and-hirono-question-federal-judicial-nominee-over-knights-of-columbus-membership
More common sense than you any day
Dec 25, 2018 08:03:18 #
Frank T wrote:
Poor Spudly. Did I upset you?
Didn't know you were such a snowflake.
Didn't know you were such a snowflake.
You started this one Frank, and then called him a snowflake when he responded in kind, what a hypocrite.
Dec 25, 2018 08:06:31 #
usnpilot wrote:
You started this one Frank, and then called him a snowflake when he responded in kind, what a hypocrite.
Are you sure he wasn't talking about you
Dec 25, 2018 08:08:31 #
dirtpusher wrote:
Are you sure he wasn't talking about you
I had not posted at that time, try to follow the thread.
Dec 25, 2018 08:23:21 #
LWW
Loc: Banana Republic of America
Frank T wrote:
Spud,
There's legitimate concern about his membership and his buying into their doctrine.
Many of the extreme positions that the KofC maintain could very well come before the Court and the question is whether or not he can separate himself from those positions.
There's legitimate concern about his membership and his buying into their doctrine.
Many of the extreme positions that the KofC maintain could very well come before the Court and the question is whether or not he can separate himself from those positions.
What extreme positions are those?
Dec 25, 2018 08:24:52 #
LWW
Loc: Banana Republic of America
usnpilot wrote:
You started this one Frank, and then called him a snowflake when he responded in kind, what a hypocrite.
Widdle Fwankie starts a lot of stuff ... and then runs away like a skeered schoolgirl being chased by a spider.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.