User ID

So Bipod the troll doth declare: "That is incorrect.
Please do yourself a favor: research it.

Does the aperture ring on the lens of your MFT
camera have f/90? Doncha think f/90 has a
humongous depth-of-field? Duh...."


Having used large cameras at f/90 I know that f/90
on a big camera is about the same DoF as f/16 on a
"miniature" camera.

On the types of cameras that DO offer f/90, there is
most certainly NO " humongous depth-of-field " at
f/90. It's just a normal everyday smaller f/stop for
subjects requiring some extra DoF.

Acoarst any idjit can look at a big number and then
declare that it provides "humongous" results, if such
idjit has never actually done the job.


.

Bipod

Exactly as much DoF as you get at f/2.8 on your MFT camera (although you get more diffraction)
But a LF camera has f/90 and an MFT doesn.t It doeesn't even have f/22!

Why can't you admit that a large format camera is capable of more DoF than an MFT camera???

tdekany Loc: Oregon

Something as easy as checking your facts so you don’t sound ignorant you can’t do.

There is indeed F22 in m4/3.

But besides that, none of this tech stuff is going to make you a better photographer.

Btw, what ever happened to your answer to the rest of my question?

Bipod

What ever happened to your anaswer to my last question: why won't you admit the obvious and well-known truth?

And here's another: What makes you think you're a photographer, tdekany?

You walked into a store (K-Mart? Best Buy?) and bought a camera. That makes you
a camera owner. Period. Unless you learn to understand photography, you are not a
photographer.

If you had bought a paintbox instead, you'd think you were an artist. Or if you'd
bought a pen, that would make you a writer. Buying is easy; understanding
is difficult. If you don't know what you're doing--then you don't know what you
doing!

My dog once sniffed a camera and depressed the shutter button. In your book, that
makes my dog a photographer. And guess what: the photo my dog took is more
interesting than the images you posted. And he's a smart dog.

Flickwet Loc: NEOhio

The Doctor told me I’m impotent, so I gots to act impotent.
I presume bipod heard those words at one time. The nonsensical content of his posts reflect a lack of understanding of photography, history and reality.

tdekany Loc: Oregon

What makes you think, that I consider myself a photographer?

The only difference between you and I is that there is proof that I have a camera and I use it. There is no proof that you even have a camera.

So let me ask you again, how come, that you are ok with posting a link to someone else’s photography, but you don’t post your own, because you don’t want it being stolen? Have you ever met anyone who is a bigger hypocrite than yourself?


You happen to be communicating on a photo forum without any photos of your own. What does that make you?

Bipod

Wise. Read the fine print.

I'm sorry that school didn't work out for you, tdekany. Maybe if you'd listened to your dad....
But don't let that sour you on education. No one is born knowing about photography or any
other subject. It's never too late to learn.

Bipod

There are a lot of avatars on UHH, but only Flickwet's completely captures the user.
Great self-portrait!

tdekany Loc: Oregon

So are you saying that it is ok to use other people’s photos as long as it isn’t yours?

Have you ever met another person who was a bigger hypocrite than yourself?

Like I said before, your argument always come from people who couldn’t take a decent photo even if their life depended on it. You are no exception. Millions of photos are posted on line daily, the chances, that your snapshots would be wanted by anyone is ZERO.

Isn’t there a medication for paranoia?

You should try comedy.