Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
CANON 18-135mm & 10-18mm STM users
Page <prev 2 of 2
Nov 16, 2018 09:12:34   #
kerry12 Loc: Harrisburg, Pa.
 
OK . Thank you. You just never know.
Architect1776 wrote:
Just adding extra glass. Nothing wrong or harm being done.

Reply
Nov 16, 2018 09:14:59   #
tonal Loc: Greece
 
With the 10-18 you better use just one filter and it should better be a slim one.
I have the 10-18 and using it with 2 stacked 67mm thin filters shows vignetting in the corners.
Polarising filters in ultra wide angles will not render a uniform sky colour result since the angle of the light varies a lot and there is nothing you can do about it.

Reply
Nov 16, 2018 09:37:04   #
rmorrison1116 Loc: Near Valley Forge, Pennsylvania
 
That didn't work...

Reply
 
 
Nov 16, 2018 09:45:11   #
Architect1776 Loc: In my mind
 
machia wrote:
How many filters are you using ?
I can use one w/o vignetting.


I keep a UV on all the time for needed protection after destroying a good lens by falling for the no filter crap.
I use a polarizer on mt lenses but remove the UV first then mount the polarizer and for that matter the same procedure with my variable ND filter.
I never get vignetting as a result of the filter but the lens has a slight natural vignetting and with a polarizer at certain angles in the sky it becomes more pronounced with a WA lens.
Here you can see the upper left corner darkening in the sky due to the natural polarization of the sky combined with the polarizer on the camera.


(Download)

Reply
Nov 16, 2018 09:49:46   #
machia Loc: NJ
 
Architect1776 wrote:
I keep a UV on all the time for needed protection after destroying a good lens by falling for the no filter crap.
I use a polarizer on mt lenses but remove the UV first then mount the polarizer and for that matter the same procedure with my variable ND filter.
I never get vignetting as a result of the filter but the lens has a slight natural vignetting and with a polarizer at certain angles in the sky it becomes more pronounced with a WA lens.
Here you can see the upper left corner darkening in the sky due to the natural polarization of the sky combined with the polarizer on the camera.
I keep a UV on all the time for needed protection ... (show quote)

THANK YOU😃

Reply
Nov 16, 2018 09:50:55   #
machia Loc: NJ
 
tonal wrote:
With the 10-18 you better use just one filter and it should better be a slim one.
I have the 10-18 and using it with 2 stacked 67mm thin filters shows vignetting in the corners.
Polarising filters in ultra wide angles will not render a uniform sky colour result since the angle of the light varies a lot and there is nothing you can do about it.

Thank you !

Reply
Nov 16, 2018 10:56:06   #
clickety
 
Architect1776 wrote:
I keep a UV on all the time for needed protection after destroying a good lens by falling for the no filter crap.
I use a polarizer on mt lenses but remove the UV first then mount the polarizer and for that matter the same procedure with my variable ND filter.
I never get vignetting as a result of the filter but the lens has a slight natural vignetting and with a polarizer at certain angles in the sky it becomes more pronounced with a WA lens.
Here you can see the upper left corner darkening in the sky due to the natural polarization of the sky combined with the polarizer on the camera.
I keep a UV on all the time for needed protection ... (show quote)


May I ask what lens the cliff dwelling was taken with?

Reply
 
 
Nov 17, 2018 08:24:38   #
kerry12 Loc: Harrisburg, Pa.
 
I guess that explains the vignetting I am getting at 18mm. Thanks again.
Architect1776 wrote:
Just adding extra glass. Nothing wrong or harm being done.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.