EyeSawYou

Keep in mind that and est. 70% of African Americans consider themselves as Democrats.


"The states with the highest rates of interracial marriage are Republican red states.."


"The states with the highest rates of interracial marriage are red states.."

These aren't terribly surprising results. National politicians with mixed-race families have tended to be Republicans. Both McCain and Mitt Romney had mixed race family members. It may be because conservatives are more likely to adopt children than liberals.

Indeed, among families with step-children or adopted children, 11 percent of conservatives were living in mixed race households compared to 10 percent of liberals living in mixed-race households.

Similarly, 9.4 percent of Republicans living in step- or adopted families were in mixed-race households, compared to only 8.8 percent of Democrats in such families. (Again, this small advantage for Republicans is not large enough to be statistically significant).

The differences are not significant, but they are real.

Interestingly enough, the states with the highest rates of interracial marriage tend to be red states, with the exception of Hawaii.

Topping the list after Hawaii, are Oklahoma, Nevada, New Mexico, Alaska, California and Arizona. Texas is well ahead of New York.

Northeastern states, which tend to be the most politically liberal, actually have lower rates of interracial marriages than western states.

Even counting white-black mixed race marriages, instead of white-hispanic, which is not really interracial anyway, the only northeastern state in the top is Massachusetts.

White-Asian interracial marriages are much higher in Alabama and Kentucky than New York.

Looking at these numbers, it's rather clear that MSNBC made a bigger mistake than the one they thought that they were making. Interracial marriage is less frequent in the liberal capitals than in "flyover" country.

https://www.frontpagemag.com/point/217732/more-conservatives-liberals-belong-mixed-race-daniel-greenfield

Frank T Loc: New York, NY

And this proves what?

jcboy3

This proves that Republicans are very good at suppressing the vote.

Texcaster Loc: Queensland

He couldn't say last time he posted this. Not much has changed.

https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-554668-1.html

EyeSawYou

Lol what??

EyeSawYou

Just more evidence of how liberals lie about Conservatives being racists.

jcboy3

It’s Republicans that are racists.

EyeSawYou

LOL nope, Democrats have a very extensive history of being racist.

jcboy3

Again, confusing past with present.

EyeSawYou

Nope, Democrats were open racists back then but they are closet racist now, at least you admit Democrats racism of the past, now it's time to own up to it now. "The states with the highest rates of interracial marriage are Republican red states.."

Explain this... "11 percent of conservatives were living in mixed race households compared to 10 percent of liberals living in mixed-race households."

jcboy3

That you will need to prove. Meanwhile, the open racism of Republicans (and sexism, and nearly any other hateism) is clear for all to see.

EyeSawYou

It appears to be clear only in the head of a delusional racist Democrat such as yourself.

Texcaster Loc: Queensland

Your authoritarian nationalist leader is very relaxed and comfortable with racial slurs, epitaphs, and hate mongering. His tent show people love it.
His last week campaign ad was too racist even for Fox. Who do you think you're fooling? Why bother?

https://www.huffingtonpost.com.au/entry/judge-cites-trumps-shithole-slam-in-ruling-on-census-lawsuit_us_5be7a536e4b0e84388989f5a

In reaching his decision he cited Trump’s widely reported comment in January at a private meeting with lawmakers “distinguishing immigrants of color— ‘these people from shithole countries’—from white immigrants from countries like Norway,” the judge wrote.

Hazel also noted Trump’s “degrading comparisons of immigrants to ‘animals’ who ‘infest’ the country.”

While “these statements were not made specifically in relation to the citizenship question, they are nonetheless relevant to understanding the administration’s motivations,” the judge wrote. “And while the use of racial slurs, epithets, or other derogatory language does not alone prove discriminatory intent, it is evidence that official action may be motivated by such an unlawful purpose.”

Texcaster Loc: Queensland

You and your open minded, minority welcoming pals are probably overjoyed with all the diversity coming to DC lawmaking.

shagbat Loc: London

Here in London I see couples of different races all the time. It used to be common to see white females and black men together, but now we are seeing more white males with black fems. This pleases me greatly, as it means that once we are all 'coffee coloured', there will be no more racial hatred in our world.