Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
My first SD card failure
Page <<first <prev 4 of 6 next> last>>
Oct 19, 2018 12:11:40   #
TuG Loc: Ventura California
 
Please excuse my reading skills if I missed it. What was the Brand and size of the SD card in question? My computer training leads me to agree with the person who noted there are ways to recover data off bad disk. Cards and drives are cheap so no one bothers to recreate what was lost except the trash divers. Price is the driver and recovery is not cheap.

Thanks for sharing your situation. It has me thinking about how my camera works when I look at the 9 little pictures on the back of my camera screen and scroll back thru say 27 photos. Is it getting the info off my card or internal memory of camera. Is there a way to check data on just backup card number 2?

Reply
Oct 19, 2018 12:35:41   #
mdpathjp
 
What's "chimping"?

Reply
Oct 19, 2018 12:46:37   #
DanielB Loc: San Diego, Ca
 
Absolutely - Second slot is a must for professional work. What do you tell your client - "Oops, sorry, I lost your shots". Has this happened to me yet - no - but I don't want it to either.
TriX wrote:
I dunno. Not much extra “card management” except inserting the 2nd card. If you’re an amateur, then losing a card full of shots may be merely inconvenient, but if you’re a working pro shooting one-time events like a wedding, it can be a catastrophe, both financially and in lost business when your reputation suffers...

Reply
 
 
Oct 19, 2018 13:57:37   #
Architect1776 Loc: In my mind
 
Stardust wrote:
Use high quality cards and if important, it takes me about 5-10 seconds to check Preview of the last couple shots before moving on. Have not had any type of failure in a decade or more.


That is what I was thinking as far as reading the card in camera. I do that while shooting and especially if it is important.
Then change cards out after shooting for a while and at a minimum at the end of the day download the card or start a new card for the next day and look at the last several shots once in a while.

Reply
Oct 19, 2018 13:58:28   #
BebuLamar
 
Bison Bud wrote:
I've been using SD memory cards since they first came out and for more than just photography. Frankly, I had heard of failures, but considered these cards to be nearly bullet proof since I had never had a problem. That all changed last weekend after coming home from a local event and finding out that I could not read or write from one of the two cards in my Pentax K3. Thankfully, the K3 has the dual card system and the other card was fine, but I had no idea that there was any sort of problem while shooting and there were several shots that I considered to be rather important from this shoot.

Anyway, my reason for posting this is to point out how important that second slot can be as a backup, as I would have been really upset if I had lost the photos from this shoot. It really makes me wonder why any manufacturer would bring out a new camera body or system without a dual slot available. I personally will never own another one without the backup slot, lesson learned! By the way, the defective SD card appears to format normally, but will not otherwise read or write in either my camera or on my computer system and I have no idea what might have caused this failure. Good luck and good shooting to all.
I've been using SD memory cards since they first c... (show quote)


Anything can fails. So if one card can fail so do both. When it's time regardless how many card slots you have you can still be without pictures.

Reply
Oct 19, 2018 14:05:38   #
TheShoe Loc: Lacey, WA
 
MT Shooter wrote:
Most systems will let you read, but not transfer from, a locked card.
Hogwash. If you can read, it follows that you can write a copy to a different device.

Reply
Oct 19, 2018 14:48:56   #
rcarol
 
rcarol wrote:
The SD card is not the only single point of failure in a camera. If your truly a pro, you will be shooting with two camera systems, alternating between the two. Only an amateur would shoot an event with one camera.


I misspelled "you're". My apologies.

Reply
 
 
Oct 19, 2018 16:48:46   #
drumme
 
I have had only one SD failure years ago traveling in India. I had only been seriously using digital for about a year. I as alternating between cards with an advanced point and shoot, got lazy and did not switch for a couple of long shoots. Everything looked good in the camera but later tha night I could not acceee anything. A fellow traveler showed me his downloads on his iPad and how he uploaded everything to the cloud regularly. I’ve upgraded equipment and travel to many r mote places around the world with higher quality SD ca de, an iPad, and regularly upload to,cloud storage which is often available even in remote locations.

Reply
Oct 19, 2018 17:07:27   #
TriX Loc: Raleigh, NC
 
billnikon wrote:
I have had three SD card failures(and they were all very trusted name brand expensive ones). One was devastating. I will only use XQD cards from now on.


Just curious (and I have no opinion as I haven’t researched it), but do you have a reference showing that XQD cards are more reliable than SDs?

Reply
Oct 19, 2018 17:11:34   #
TriX Loc: Raleigh, NC
 
rcarol wrote:
The SD card is not the only single point of failure in a camera. If your truly a pro, you will be shooting with two camera systems, alternating between the two. Only an amateur would shoot an event with one camera.


Absolutely agree!

Reply
Oct 19, 2018 17:31:59   #
nadelewitz Loc: Ithaca NY
 
Someone enlighten me, please. Are XQD cards thought to be absolutely, positively, forever failure-proof?

Why are people saying they give up on SD cards and will only ever again use XQD?

Reply
 
 
Oct 19, 2018 17:32:57   #
PAR4DCR Loc: A Sunny Place
 
Only use high quality cards, Sandisk or Lexar, no problems yet. I like the dual card set up in my D7100 and D7200.

Don

Reply
Oct 19, 2018 17:36:47   #
T Evans Loc: Lost Angeles
 
I've been using SD cards, micro-SD cards and CF cards for over a decade. These things do wear out. I only go with "name brands" and US made, but still, they develop problems, and they literally wear out after perhaps 1000 uses, perhaps sooner. I never trust a single SD or CF card to work without fail. I always carry a spare card, and when shooting with a Canon DSLR, I make sure that the menu item that lets you "shoot without card" is not checked. That way if a card goes bad when I'm shooting, the camera will tell me and I can change to my back up card.

Reply
Oct 19, 2018 17:48:26   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
TuG wrote:
Please excuse my reading skills if I missed it. What was the Brand and size of the SD card in question? My computer training leads me to agree with the person who noted there are ways to recover data off bad disk. Cards and drives are cheap so no one bothers to recreate what was lost except the trash divers. Price is the driver and recovery is not cheap.

Thanks for sharing your situation. It has me thinking about how my camera works when I look at the 9 little pictures on the back of my camera screen and scroll back thru say 27 photos. Is it getting the info off my card or internal memory of camera. Is there a way to check data on just backup card number 2?
Please excuse my reading skills if I missed it. Wh... (show quote)

An SD card is not a disk. A disk is magnetic media, that once bits are stored, the magnetic direction must be altered to change it. The DISK might be able to be read (the magnetic image stored on it), but an SD card is silicon media not magnetic.

Reply
Oct 19, 2018 18:42:23   #
Jim70 Loc: Delaware
 
Guess there's a reason why parachutists have a backup chute!

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 6 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.