I’m Looking For The Mirrorless Cameras..., Were Are They?!?! (Page 18): You don't understand or know how Sony works. Relax, it wont be 20 years, maybe two or three at the most, and...

gwilliams6

Bipod wrote:

That's great if its true. But businesses can only... (show quote)

You don't understand or know how Sony works. Relax, it wont be 20 years, maybe two or three at the most, and when they release it in a camera it will be ready. Your speculation about problems and pressure to make money on this are way over exaggerated . Man , I have been accused of being over-winded, but you take the cake for over reaction to a post. You would make your points clearer without all the hyperbole and exposition. Cheers

Bipod

Don't get all huffy. I just diasgreed with you.

If you're sure about that, Sony stock SNE closed today at 56.10,
down -1.87 (-3.23%). It's down from its 52 week high of 61.2.
But it's done well over the last five years--might be a bargain.

Or maybe the market knows something you don't know.

tdekany Loc: Oregon

Bipod wrote:

Don't get all huffy. I just diasgreed with you.

If you're sure about that, Sony stock SNE closed today at 56.10,
down -1.87 (-3.23%). It's down from its 52 week high of 61.2.
But it's done well over the last five years--might be a bargain.

Or maybe the market knows something you don't know.

Hi pod!! Do you actually take pictures or do you just yack about it?

SharpShooter Loc: NorCal

gwilliams6 wrote:

You don't understand or know how Sony works. Relax, it wont be 20 years, maybe two or three at the most, and when they release it in a camera it will be ready. Your speculation about problems and pressure to make money on this are way over exaggerated . Man , I have been accused of being over-winded, but you take the cake for over reaction to a post. You would make your points clearer without all the hyperbole and exposition. Cheers

Naw, you’re still the CHAMP!!! LoL
And King fanboy too!
In camera tech, 2-3 years IS 20 years !!!
Better only be a year!
SS

gwilliams6

SharpShooter wrote:

Naw, you’re still the CHAMP!!! LoL
And King fanboy too!
In camera tech, 2-3 years IS 20 years !!!
Better only be a year!
SS

Ha ha, just get over it all you Nikon and Canon fanboys until you have better mirrorless gear. Maybe next generation. Cheers

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xeFBVWHtuX4
FANBOYS Cripple Innovation! (Dave McKeegan)

gwilliams6

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lltk1ju9YeQ
Time to Switch to Sony from Canon? | Sony A7iii Review as a Canon 1Dx Mark ii Owner

Bill_de Loc: US

gwilliams6 wrote:

FANBOYS Cripple Innovation! (Dave McKeegan)

If that's true you'll single handedly have Sony stuck in place in no time at all. Too bad, they might do well if you switch brands.

--

gwilliams6

Bill_de wrote:

If that's true you'll single handedly have Sony stuck in place in no time at all. Too bad, they might do well if you switch brands.

--

It was meant more for fanboys of poorer quality competition like the current Nikon and Canon mirrorless releases who cant face the reality that their fav brands are ever second-best, even for an instant. Cheers
.

Bill_de Loc: US

gwilliams6 wrote:

It was meant more for fanboys of poorer quality competition like the current Nikon and Canon mirrorless releases who cant face the reality that their fav brands are ever second-best, even for an instant. Cheers
.

--

Nalu Loc: Southern Arizona

When you are shooting slow moving subjects like bicycle riders, you don't need a fast camera like an A9.

gwilliams6

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X6sBYdEzu8s

CANON EOS R REVIEW vs A7III (from the EASTCORE, 10/12/18)

skingfong Loc: Sacramento

SharpShooter wrote:

That’s right guys, I’m looking for all those mirro... (show quote)

I shoot Canon, but I can see the potential for mirrorless whether it's Sony, Canon, Nikon or something else. It's evolving. I think the reason for many of not switching is they are married and committed to their systems because they're heavily invested into their lenses. Also some agencies provide the big pricey lenses to their photographers. Another reason for not changing yet is photographers can still get great images with what they already have. Mirrorless may not dominate the pro market now, but it's coming. That's progress and evolution.

gwilliams6

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-rn04Zsc4_4

Video replay of yesterday's great three-way Live Youtube discussion with top pro-shooter/reviewers Photo-Me-Ike (Nikon shooter), That1cameraguy (Canon and Sony shooter and photo educator) and David Oastler (former Nikon now Sony shooter).

They discuss Nikon, Canon, Sony, Fuji, Panasonic, Sigma and more. One hour, 30 minutes. Enjoy, Cheers

JohnFrim Loc: Somewhere in the Great White North.

gwilliams6 wrote:

... They discuss Nikon, Canon, Sony, Fuji, Panasonic, Sigma and more. One hour, 30 minutes. Enjoy, Cheers

No summary for those of us who don't want to spend 90 minutes on YouTube?

SharpShooter Loc: NorCal

skingfong wrote:

I shoot Canon, but I can see the potential for mir... (show quote)

Skin, I’m not disagreeing with you. It probably IS coming. Then again, so was Sony Beta, the bigger, better mouse trap.
And from what little I’ve seen, looks like ML is great for landscapers and slow moving events. In still-shots one can take advantage of the myriad of functions built into the view finder.
But for very fast action most of those advantages seem to be less effective. If they were half the size would be really cool but they’re not. A 400mm 2.8 lens on a FF is still just that, a big heavy lens.
A lot of options in a camera to accomplish the same thing won’t make the final image better.
A big advantage will be when they start to build in graduated filters and such, but if those things are built into a sensor or a processor won’t make a lot of difference either.
I’m not impressed by do-dads. Like I said, I don’t need 50 ways to take the same photo if I’m getting the same results!!!
I’m seeing more ML cameras in BLOGS than in the field. It seems my events aren’t big enough for ML!!! LoL
SS