Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Film Photography section of our forum.
The Attic
An interesting analysis (NBCNEWS.com no less) of Kavenaugh's judicial rulings
Page <<first <prev 3 of 4 next>
Oct 10, 2018 21:36:01   #
incognito
 
Frosty wrote:
......and. what exactly does this have to do with upholding the constitution?
Just the tactics used to smear Kavanaugh that is all and described in full by Palosi

Reply
Oct 10, 2018 21:40:07   #
SharpShooter Loc: NorCal
 
Frosty wrote:
Do you get puddles by your feet often?


Only while standing over BIG snowflakes or conservatives....., mostly conservatives!!! LoL
SS

Reply
Oct 10, 2018 22:37:17   #
Frosty Loc: Minnesota
 
incognito wrote:
Listen to Nancy Palosi's admission of how the democratic smear campaign works. Was on the radio today.


Was on the Radio today!!! That explains a lot. It sounds like right wing hate radio where they distort the truth and downright lie about anything to do with democrats.

Conservatives are desperate to cover for Kavenaugh's despicable behavior at the hearing. He made unsubstantiated outrageous claims during his angry introductory remarks.

Democrats did nothing except ask him tough questions because the hearing was conducted to determine if he was drunk and attempted to rape a 15 year old girl. There is no easy way to do this.

Reply
 
 
Oct 11, 2018 00:32:50   #
Curtis_Lowe Loc: Georgia
 
Twardlow wrote:
That is simplicity itself. Read his yearbook entries. Nuff said.

Also, repeated lies under Oath, check!

Also, refusal to make his writings public for scrutiny, or dumping 40,000 of them within 24 hours fo the vote.

This last is probably not his doing, but his handlers, so they are slimy, too.

No need to get to the sex part, except I think the Gods of Truth should speak to multiple gang rapes, and that should be investigated.


Twardlow,

the documents you reference that were held back from the Judicial Committee were from his time as the secretary in Bush Administration, meaning he was not the author of these documents they just crossed his desk, he organized and prioritized for the president.

You say you research these issues before you form an opinion? Something tells me you did very little research on this issue or you did not understand what you read about it.


The community these people livened in 36 years ago was fairly small, activity like the 10 gang rape party would not have gone unnoticed. And like the other two accusers the folks put forth to corroborate the story did not do so. In fact said that they did not know what she was talking about.


Maybe you are convinced but not by any evidence made public.

Reply
Oct 11, 2018 11:20:53   #
skylane5sp Loc: Puyallup, WA
 
Curtis_Lowe wrote:
Twardlow,

the documents you reference that were held back from the Judicial Committee were from his time as the secretary in Bush Administration, meaning he was not the author of these documents they just crossed his desk, he organized and prioritized for the president.

You say you research these issues before you form an opinion? Something tells me you did very little research on this issue or you did not understand what you read about it.


The community these people livened in 36 years ago was fairly small, activity like the 10 gang rape party would not have gone unnoticed. And like the other two accusers the folks put forth to corroborate the story did not do so. In fact said that they did not know what she was talking about.


Maybe you are convinced but not by any evidence made public.
Twardlow, br br the documents you reference that ... (show quote)


Tward is still desperately hanging on to "Hands Up. Don't Shoot" as the foundation of his reality.

Reply
Oct 11, 2018 13:11:49   #
RichieC Loc: Adirondacks
 
[quote=Frosty]
RichieC wrote:


"......That being said, all I want is that he upholds the constitution, which is what everyone sitting on that bench's only mission is, and what every liberal is against... "

....

Really!! Liberals against upholding the constitution and conservatives uphold it???!!??!
What evidence do you possess to validate these unsubstantiated claims?


The ONLY party that is supporting changing the various parts of the constitution are from the radical left wing democratic party... it stands to reason that because a CONSERVATIVE nominee is opposed so vehemently is because of the intent to sway the court away from CONSERVING the constitution. Wether or not this man upholds or opposes the constitution is nowhere in the condemnation of this man- his entire career as a judge is thus apparently, because of their omission, beyond reproach. They had to resort to reading his yearbook and listening to the unsubstantiated and foggy nattering poor woman who lied about the most important parts of her story and whose entire pile of "proof" - completely fell through... to oppose him.

Now Mr. Packed pile of snowflakes... you can try to blow smoke up your minions butt all you want- but you are not fooling anybody, neither has the proceedings. The way the entire thing was played, was simply Democrats going all in and playing their hand poorly and loosing badly- the ace they thought they had up their sleeve, turned out to be a joker.

Oh and allowing the government to force people to buy a product by calling it a tax, sets a precedent that can allow them to dictate the purchase of anything, as long as they dress it up all nice.

Justices Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, and Alito joined an unsigned dissent that argued the individual mandate was unconstitutional because it represented an attempt by Congress to regulate beyond its power under the Commerce Clause. Further, they argued that reclassifying the Individual Mandate as a tax rather than a penalty in order to sustain its constitutionality was not to interpret the statute but to rewrite it, which they deemed a troubling exercise of judicial power, This rewriting it so it would pass.. is itself UNCONSTITUTIONAL.

It was passed ... shredding the constitution- which by its design is primarily meant to limit the governments power over individuals, in a 5-4 ruling - guess which left leaning members voted for it?.

Reply
Oct 11, 2018 16:28:38   #
Twardlow Loc: Arkansas
 
skylane5sp wrote:
Tward is still desperately hanging on to "Hands Up. Don't Shoot" as the foundation of his reality.


You damn betcha. Chief retired, officer gone, department reorganized, family paid, prosecuting district attorney lost last election—vindication!

Reply
Check out Video for DSLR and Point and Shoot Cameras section of our forum.
Oct 11, 2018 16:30:22   #
Twardlow Loc: Arkansas
 
RichieC wrote:
The ONLY party that is supporting changing the various parts of the constitution are from the radical left wing democratic party... it stands to reason that because a CONSERVATIVE nominee is opposed so vehemently is because of the intent to sway the court away from CONSERVING the constitution. Wether or not this man upholds or opposes the constitution is nowhere in the condemnation of this man- his entire career as a judge is thus apparently, because of their omission, beyond reproach. They had to resort to reading his yearbook and listening to the unsubstantiated and foggy nattering poor woman who lied about the most important parts of her story and whose entire pile of "proof" - completely fell through... to oppose him.

Now Mr. Packed pile of snowflakes... you can try to blow smoke up your minions butt all you want- but you are not fooling anybody, neither has the proceedings. The way the entire thing was played, was simply Democrats going all in and playing their hand poorly and loosing badly- the ace they thought they had up their sleeve, turned out to be a joker.

Oh and allowing the government to force people to buy a product by calling it a tax, sets a precedent that can allow them to dictate the purchase of anything, as long as they dress it up all nice.

Justices Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, and Alito joined an unsigned dissent that argued the individual mandate was unconstitutional because it represented an attempt by Congress to regulate beyond its power under the Commerce Clause. Further, they argued that reclassifying the Individual Mandate as a tax rather than a penalty in order to sustain its constitutionality was not to interpret the statute but to rewrite it, which they deemed a troubling exercise of judicial power, This rewriting it so it would pass.. is itself UNCONSTITUTIONAL.

It was passed ... shredding the constitution- which by its design is primarily meant to limit the governments power over individuals, in a 5-4 ruling - guess which left leaning members voted for it?.
The ONLY party that is supporting changing the var... (show quote)


Confused Blather, Blather, Blather....

Reply
Oct 11, 2018 16:38:11   #
NeilL Loc: British-born Canadian
 
SharpShooter wrote:
LoL, come on Steve, it's been ONE DAY!!! LoL
That DOESN'T make him innocent of attempted rape either!!!
Plenty of high functioning attemped rapist and criminals out there!
SS


You describe slick willy clinton to a tee.

Reply
Oct 11, 2018 17:41:26   #
skylane5sp Loc: Puyallup, WA
 
Twardlow wrote:
You damn betcha. Chief retired, officer gone, department reorganized, family paid, prosecuting district attorney lost last election—vindication!


You are a legend in your own mind...

Reply
Oct 11, 2018 17:52:35   #
NeilL Loc: British-born Canadian
 
skylane5sp wrote:
You are a legend in your own mind...


Mind? What mind?

Reply
Check out Astronomical Photography Forum section of our forum.
Oct 11, 2018 20:43:24   #
Twardlow Loc: Arkansas
 
skylane5sp wrote:
You are a legend in your own mind...


We’re dealin’ with Fact here, if you notice.....

Reply
Oct 11, 2018 20:44:46   #
Twardlow Loc: Arkansas
 
NeilL wrote:
Mind? What mind?


Well, I now how scientists got the temperatures 10,000 years ago, and you friggin’ don’t!

So my mind is better thatn whatever you sure for one.

Reply
Oct 11, 2018 22:19:07   #
NeilL Loc: British-born Canadian
 
Twardlow wrote:
Well, I now how scientists got the temperatures 10,000 years ago, and you friggin’ don’t!

So my mind is better thatn whatever you sure for one.


Aaaahh. You were there. If you'd learn to speak English, then perhaps you would at least start on a level playing field.

Reply
Oct 11, 2018 23:18:31   #
SHLeM52 Loc: Jacksonville, FL
 
SharpShooter wrote:
Your kidding right?
If not, support that joke!!! LoL
No wonder this country is F*KKED!!!
SS


OK, ya got me. I tried to sneak one in on ya. Kinda like the dossier that Hillary paid for. Was any of the rest of my statement wrong? You seem to be the truth police! What would a Liberal Californian know about the truth? Your state is going down the sewer, and you want to drag the rest of the country with it. I was wrong, you all should secede from the union. You won't be missed! Now are you going to send your Brownshirt ANTIFA goons after me?? Ooooo, I'm scared the basement people will come and get me.. Ooooo If this country is "F*kked" as you so succinctly put it we'll solve that when they flush Cali and all you Socialist Ass wipes.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 4 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Wedding Photography section of our forum.
The Attic
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.