MauiMoto wrote:
Maybe I misunderstood this statement, but it seems like you are somehow suggesting you are more courageous than a man who protects himself and others from evils and not depending on another man with a gun if and when the need arises. Maybe you're just sheltered and naive and forgot the importance of the constitution and the United States.
I protect myself: just not by shooting other Americans....
...who just as much as you or me have Constitutional guarantees of life,
due process of law, and the right to live in a civil society, not an
armed camp.
What's more important: your life or this country and the rule-of-law?
Criminals should be brought to justice, not killed on the spot.
For one thing, not every person who appears to be a criminal or
seems to be thretening you actually is a threat. (Dare I speak the
truth that most white people perceive black people as threatening?)
I used to be an NRA member, back when it stood for "National Rifle
Association" and advocated hunters' safety. And back when there
weren't 327 million people living in the USA --almost 40 million of
them in my state. The frontier is over.
There is a very simple way to avoid the risk of shooting another American:
don't carry a gun. What sort of gun would Jesus have carried?
Or Confucious? Or the Buddha? Or Socrates? Would they have
favored dum-dums, explosive point, tracers or jacketed rounds?
I suppose Socrates could have knifed his guards and broken out of jail--
he'd been a soldier. And Jesus (assuming historicity) and his followers
could have speared the Roman guards and run away...