Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Anyone have an opinion, things "FUJI"??
Page <prev 2 of 2
Oct 3, 2018 10:56:28   #
sergiohm
 
The ideal would be the Fuji 50-140mm f/2.8, weather resistant and constant aperture. It is expensive but a great lens!
I much prefer the 55-200 to the 18-135 and I had both at the same time and kept the 55-200, the 18-135 found another owner.

Reply
Oct 3, 2018 12:36:42   #
digit-up Loc: Flushing, Michigan
 
I appreciate everyones’ Comments.Makes me comfortable with another “sight unseen”purchase from B&H.

Reply
Oct 3, 2018 12:38:23   #
digit-up Loc: Flushing, Michigan
 
CatMarley wrote:
I have both lenses, and use them all the time, but the 18 - 135 I find more often on the front of my X-T2 than the 55-200. That gap between 55 and 100 is a distance I use a lot, as I do a lot of photographing of my dogs. Your needs may be different. Both are sharp and accurate, and nice to handle.


Thank you,CAT!!

Reply
Check out Printers and Color Printing Forum section of our forum.
Oct 3, 2018 14:34:23   #
Mama Bear984 Loc: Langley, BC Canada
 
digit-up wrote:
I have been researching two lenses by fuji, that would cover the area between my fuji 18-50mm and my Fuji 100-400mm. What many would call a "walking around lens. I am considering the 55-200 and the 18-135mm lenses. Without having my hands on either of them, I have formed an opinion (uninformed, basically) favoring the "made-in-Japan, 55 -200mm. It's $200 less than the 18-135mm and NOT weatherproof. I'm a bit nervous about a coin toss to make a choice, and thought that there may be HOGGS that know something about either, or both. RSVP, please, or P.M. me.. Thanks. RJM
I have been researching two lenses by fuji, that w... (show quote)


I have the 18-135, 100-400 & 55-200. Most of the time the 18-135 is on my camera. I took the 55-200 to Alaska to shoot the glacier from the ship. Wish I had taken the 100-409 instead. I love my 18-135.

Reply
Oct 3, 2018 15:06:23   #
srshorb
 
18-55 a great lens

Reply
Oct 3, 2018 19:47:58   #
Mama Bear984 Loc: Langley, BC Canada
 
I have that one too

Reply
Oct 3, 2018 19:59:33   #
CatMarley Loc: North Carolina
 
sergiohm wrote:
The ideal would be the Fuji 50-140mm f/2.8, weather resistant and constant aperture. It is expensive but a great lens!
I much prefer the 55-200 to the 18-135 and I had both at the same time and kept the 55-200, the 18-135 found another owner.


Yes the 50-140 is a nice lens, but it is 7 inches long and weighs almost 4 pounds! The 18 - 135 is under 4 inches long and is 1.08 lbs. Lugging the 59-140 around would be a workout! And at over $1000 it is no bargain either.

Reply
Check out The Dynamics of Photographic Lighting section of our forum.
Oct 3, 2018 20:03:26   #
Mama Bear984 Loc: Langley, BC Canada
 
I wouldn’t be buying the 50-14o unless I was into weddings or portraits. I have no use for it. It’s a great lens I just would need it. I use my 100-400 for wildlife & the 18-135 i use when I travel. It gives me what I need. I did use my 55-200 when I went to Alaska, I used it for eagles by the water, it did a great job considering. I just didn’t want to take my other for a cruise.

Reply
Oct 3, 2018 20:14:12   #
leftj Loc: Texas
 
digit-up wrote:
I have been researching two lenses by fuji, that would cover the area between my fuji 18-50mm and my Fuji 100-400mm. What many would call a "walking around lens. I am considering the 55-200 and the 18-135mm lenses. Without having my hands on either of them, I have formed an opinion (uninformed, basically) favoring the "made-in-Japan, 55 -200mm. It's $200 less than the 18-135mm and NOT weatherproof. I'm a bit nervous about a coin toss to make a choice, and thought that there may be HOGGS that know something about either, or both. RSVP, please, or P.M. me.. Thanks. RJM
I have been researching two lenses by fuji, that w... (show quote)


For a walk around lens i think you would be much happier with the 18-135mm than the 55-200. The $200 difference in cost is a non-factor when you consider which lens will do a better job.

Reply
Oct 3, 2018 22:47:44   #
cwp3420
 
digit-up wrote:
I have been researching two lenses by fuji, that would cover the area between my fuji 18-50mm and my Fuji 100-400mm. What many would call a "walking around lens. I am considering the 55-200 and the 18-135mm lenses. Without having my hands on either of them, I have formed an opinion (uninformed, basically) favoring the "made-in-Japan, 55 -200mm. It's $200 less than the 18-135mm and NOT weatherproof. I'm a bit nervous about a coin toss to make a choice, and thought that there may be HOGGS that know something about either, or both. RSVP, please, or P.M. me.. Thanks. RJM
I have been researching two lenses by fuji, that w... (show quote)


I use the 18-55 on my X-T2 all the time. I used to use the 16-55, but didn’t care for the weight. I didn’t like the 55-200 personally.

Reply
Oct 3, 2018 23:39:58   #
AndyGarcia
 
digit-up wrote:
I have been researching two lenses by fuji, that would cover the area between my fuji 18-50mm and my Fuji 100-400mm. What many would call a "walking around lens. I am considering the 55-200 and the 18-135mm lenses. Without having my hands on either of them, I have formed an opinion (uninformed, basically) favoring the "made-in-Japan, 55 -200mm. It's $200 less than the 18-135mm and NOT weatherproof. I'm a bit nervous about a coin toss to make a choice, and thought that there may be HOGGS that know something about either, or both. RSVP, please, or P.M. me.. Thanks. RJM
I have been researching two lenses by fuji, that w... (show quote)


I have the 18-135 lens and use it almost constantly on my Xt1. When I first got it it took a while to get the best results. Now I am very pleased with it. Some people say it's soft but I don't agree. For me it works very well as a "jack of all trades". I live in Cosa Rica and can encounter on my walk to the beach (and along the beach) Iguanas taking the sun, Ospreys, Willets, Blue Herons, a fabulous almost empty beach with fabulous light, in the evenings great Sunsets etc etc. The lens handles almost everything that gets thrown at it. It's light, compact, quiet, fast focusing and the lens stabilisation works brilliantly. Also it means I am not having to change lenses. Here are a few photos taken with it. If you have any other questions just message me, I would recommend this lens without reservation.


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)

Reply
Check out Landscape Photography section of our forum.
Oct 4, 2018 09:29:46   #
digit-up Loc: Flushing, Michigan
 
Well, since I pulled the trigger, so-to-speak, and bought the 55-200mm yesterday, from B&H, the issue is now MUTE.. Thanks, ALL. RJM

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out The Dynamics of Photographic Lighting section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.