It is possible that she dealt with shorter men who were uncomfortable with looking up. Then it would seem like they were "focusing" on her breasts. I was 6' 2" for most of my life and I found it interesting this phenomenon of having the shorter guys looking at my chest. Let her know that she should take into account their heights. Most of them were looking just straight ahead.

I think that the pose of the last shot would have been a better candidate for being done in nude than the first. Personally, I find arms placed behind the back not to my liking. But that is me.

It is a rarity to find people who are comfortable in their skins like Billie Jo. More power to her.

(An aside. I dated a woman in college who was 6' 7", proportional like Billie Jo.)

Attractive lady - like all of the photos.
The whole series is attractive and does answer something for me - which is the conversion from clothed to nude.

When I see a woman on the street the first thing I notice is her total being. If that is attractive I then go to her face - if I like her face I look next to her breasts - if I like what I can imagine I then go back to her face then down to her hips. If any of the points I look at are unattractive I'm finished looking. Behind these few seconds of eye travel is the question "What would she look like without clothes?" and the imagining.
This is the first series here on UHH that I can recall that answers that question as it is brought forth.

For this lady I would make the entire tour with hopefully enough time to go back to do it again or to focus on some part.
I offer no apology for being a man with the inherent desire to look!

I have wonder if the series would have been perfect rather than just near perfect had her nude image appeared last.
Thanks for a great series.