Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Photo Gallery
Shutter vs Flash
Page <prev 2 of 2
Sep 27, 2018 09:44:45   #
David Lyon
 
[quote=MSW]back in the ancient years of silver halide film (the glory days of films like Tri-X and Kodachrome)...

Thanks for making me feel old. I am “from the ancient years” and still shoot film. Agree with the flash sinc. and one reason I love by MF leaf shutter lenses. You can use a flash as fill up to 1/500th of a second.

Praise Eastman that Tri-x is still around for us to shoot. Alas, I have not been a chrome shooter, so I helped lead to the death of Kodachrome.

Reply
Sep 27, 2018 11:10:25   #
JeffDavidson Loc: Originally Detroit Now Los Angeles
 
Beautiful. Flash works.

Reply
Sep 27, 2018 14:19:25   #
jak86094
 
joer wrote:
Taken at 1/100s. The flash stopped most of the movement.


Thanks for sharing both the photo and the method used to capture it with slight ghosting. I LIKE it with the ghosting of the wing motion. I think you could have even gotten away with a slower shutter speed except it probably would have captured a bit more ghosting of the head and body than in your shot. I assume you were using a low ISO since your primary light source was flash. There's virtually NO noise. Keep shooting; keep sharing. jak

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Photo Gallery
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.