some comments would be appreciated, good or bad?
JohnFrim
Loc: Somewhere in the Great White North.
The "bright" area seems a bit concentrated. I don't know if I would prefer less contrast (greyer) or a bit more whitening of the legs to better define the body outlines. I also see a different effect on the left thigh vs the right, when I am perhaps expecting to see more similar treatment of what would be similar skin tones in the original. Same comment on the pube whisker treatment from left to right, but that could be due to depth of field in the original photo (which might also explain the different effects on the legs).
I think the filtering has interesting possibilities, but for some reason this one does not grab me as "wow, yes!" Do you have any other images showing more or other body sections?
think the bright areas is where the light was reflecting from water on the model's body?
RogStrix wrote:
some comments would be appreciated, good or bad?
RigStrix,
You need to be patient for feedback in this section. There are not many subscribers and often it seems that everyone is waiting for the other guy to comment. This is especially true if they are looking to offer criticism rather than praise.
For me, this is a visually interesting piece of graphic art. I could imagine it as a very large print on the wall of a museum for a temporary exhibition. That said, the true nature of the subject is almost too hidden for my taste. If it was not posted in this section it would probably take me much longer to realize what it is. Generally speaking I do not like inversions and their derivative results. This however works for me. I see that you've posted another image, this comment was directed at your first posting.
JohnFrim
Loc: Somewhere in the Great White North.
Overall I like the second photo a lot better than the first. What I don't care for is the overly large hand, and then I could do without the ghost image. The model has a great figure for this kind of photography... and probably even without the filtering!!!
think the large hand is the angle the shot was taken at with a wide angle lens?
JohnFrim
Loc: Somewhere in the Great White North.
Let me add another comment as to why I like this second photo. It reminds me of the cartoon drawings of sexy women heroes, like Wonder Woman or Bat Woman in the nude, where the cartoonist can make them as unreal and overly sexy as he likes. It's just that much better to see that this is a real woman.
thank you, I must have read a different sort of comic to you lol! Dan Dare was never naked...
The model in question is doing 'life modelling' at a local arts class
there has to be three in a sequence, here's the last one...
hand still appears large but I can assure you it isn't...
JohnFrim
Loc: Somewhere in the Great White North.
I just noticed your other image that you added to a different thread [edit: and repeated here]. Again, in that one the large hand bothers me because it looks far too masculine. I don't know if you can control that, but I don't like the loss of femininity of a delicate hand.
And I still like the naked Wonder Woman in the second photo best.
RogStrix wrote:
try this one...
This has a bit of a "wow," factor. Despite the busy background, I like the effect. Try it with less "noise."
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.