Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
New member...looking for a tripod recommendation
Page <<first <prev 3 of 4 next>
Sep 18, 2018 11:33:52   #
Notorious T.O.D. Loc: Harrisburg, North Carolina
 
Gene51 wrote:
Load capacity has nothing to do with stability. Nearly all tripods - even this $29 tripod has a 4.4lb load capacity, which will support an APS-C DSLR and a typical lens - like a D500 and an 18-300mm zoom - which only weighs 3.5 lbs.

https://www.amazon.com/Fotopro-Wireless-Bluetooth-Adapter-Release/dp/B01N562A19/ref=sr_1_1?s=pho
to&ie=UTF8&qid=1537280413&sr=1-1&refinements=p_36%3A1253504011


But I would bet a dollar that it won't be stable enough for any possible application.

However, someone putting $3000 worth of gear on a $29 tripod . . . I will say no more.
Load capacity has nothing to do with stability. Ne... (show quote)





Let alone $10-$20k worth of gear...

Reply
Sep 18, 2018 12:23:29   #
Murray Loc: New Westminster
 
DaveO wrote:
As you continue to peruse the forum you will see that this is a popular query. Further, you will see that many have acquired second and third units to accommodate unanticipated long lenses or ventures where more stable tripods are needed or desired. Having said this, I would recommend attempting to obtain one that can be used with many applications for many years. Be cautious when deciding what height you may need and pick one that can be adjusted to your desired height without extending a center column. Take your time and do it right the first time!
As you continue to peruse the forum you will see t... (show quote)


Love the phrase “unanticipated long lenses”. That means if (another) winds up in my bag, it’s an accident, right??😅😅😅

Reply
Sep 18, 2018 13:15:55   #
RCP
 
I researched tripods a year+ ago and learned quite a bit, so do your homework. A few tidbits:
- equipment weight isn't as critical as you might think, other factors will make the determination. such as the longest focal length of the lens you want to use means you want a tripod with larger diameter legs (they are much stiffer). Gitzo and Really Right Stuff websites have info on this factor
- yes on carbon fiber; much better vibration dampening and stiffness. there's a test report some fellow did a while back on that available on the web
- get one as tall as you need to have the viewfinder at eye level for your normal shooting (don't forget to take into account the head you select; only use a center column for unusual circumstances as they add to vibration
- heads are a whole 'nother research project!
For my needs, I wound up selecting an Induro CLT304L and Acratech GPss for my Sony a6300 w/300mm lens (I'm 5'9") and I'm happy with the choices.
Have fun and good luck!

Reply
 
 
Sep 18, 2018 13:20:48   #
lhardister Loc: Brownsville, TN
 
Haleysnaps wrote:
Hello all!
I have been reading Ugly Hedgehog for a few weeks and just made the deep dive to register and start actively participating. I am an avid amateur photographer and love to shoot action (sports - I have 3 kids playing tennis, hockey and soccer) and street scenes. I just made a huge move, leaving behind my NIKON system for a Sony Alpha a7111. Yep, a little scared about it, but looking forward not back. As I'm investing in new lenses, I also would like to purchase a new tripod...and would love your recommendations.. I like to be mobile when I shoot and realize a monopod could be really useful, but definitely want a tripod in my arsenal. Willing to invest the $$$ for something that will be with me for years. Any input much appreciated. Thanks in advance!
Hello all! br I have been reading Ugly Hedgehog fo... (show quote)


If you do a search of UHH on your topic, you will find a wealth of information, and not a little argument, previously posted. FWIW, I have a Sirui N3205-X with K-30 ball head which I like very much for its small size, strength, portability, and relatively reasonable price. I think it would work fine for kids' sports and street scenes with an a7iii and lenses up to about 300mm. For my attempts at shooting wildlife with telephoto rig and gimbal head, I use a considerably larger, heavier, purportedly more stable but much less portable Induro carbon fiber rig.


Best regards,

Reply
Sep 18, 2018 13:32:31   #
DaveO Loc: Northeast CT
 
Murray wrote:
Love the phrase “unanticipated long lenses”. That means if (another) winds up in my bag, it’s an accident, right??😅😅😅


I had no intentions of going longer than my inexpensive 55-300. I will not bore you with the gory details. Check the bottom left side beneath my avatar.

Reply
Sep 18, 2018 13:55:56   #
WayneL Loc: Baltimore Md
 
Haleysnaps wrote:
Hello all!
I have been reading Ugly Hedgehog for a few weeks and just made the deep dive to register and start actively participating. I am an avid amateur photographer and love to shoot action (sports - I have 3 kids playing tennis, hockey and soccer) and street scenes. I just made a huge move, leaving behind my NIKON system for a Sony Alpha a7111. Yep, a little scared about it, but looking forward not back. As I'm investing in new lenses, I also would like to purchase a new tripod...and would love your recommendations.. I like to be mobile when I shoot and realize a monopod could be really useful, but definitely want a tripod in my arsenal. Willing to invest the $$$ for something that will be with me for years. Any input much appreciated. Thanks in advance!
Hello all! br I have been reading Ugly Hedgehog fo... (show quote)

Sirui makes good tripods and ball heads that you don't need to take out a second mortgage to buy.

Reply
Sep 18, 2018 14:52:02   #
Murray Loc: New Westminster
 
DaveO wrote:
I had no intentions of going longer than my inexpensive 55-300. I will not bore you with the gory details. Check the bottom left side beneath my avatar.


I think my wife has the same way of thinking.

Best

Murray

Reply
 
 
Sep 18, 2018 16:19:33   #
rfmaude41 Loc: Lancaster, Texas (DFW area)
 


That would also be my suggestion.

No need for the google search:

https://www.cameracottage.com

Reply
Sep 18, 2018 16:55:24   #
Bipod
 
Haleysnaps wrote:
Hello all!
I have been reading Ugly Hedgehog for a few weeks and just made the deep dive to register and start actively participating. I am an avid amateur photographer and love to shoot action (sports - I have 3 kids playing tennis, hockey and soccer) and street scenes. I just made a huge move, leaving behind my NIKON system for a Sony Alpha a7111. Yep, a little scared about it, but looking forward not back. As I'm investing in new lenses, I also would like to purchase a new tripod...and would love your recommendations.. I like to be mobile when I shoot and realize a monopod could be really useful, but definitely want a tripod in my arsenal. Willing to invest the $$$ for something that will be with me for years. Any input much appreciated. Thanks in advance!
Hello all! br I have been reading Ugly Hedgehog fo... (show quote)

Given your interests, I think you've got what you need already: a monopod. Especially since your camera is
lightweight (about 1.3 lbs with battery and without lens, I think) and has 5-axis inside image stabilization.

As I just posted on another thread, tripods are a compromise between maximum stability and minimum weight.
No single tripod can do all jobs. The particular "features" of a tripod are not as important as its particular compromise
it strikes between stability and weight.

Special requirements requiring more stability:
* windy conditions
* long exposures/low light
* telephoto
* macro (if you plan to shoot flowers, you'll need a tripod that can get down to flower level).

After about $130, additional money just buys reduced weight. That's important if you're going
to be carrying the tripod long distances--otherwise it's not. Don't think you have to have carbon fiber
or titanium just to keep up with the Jones. And the best way to buy tripods is used.

So it comes down to:
(1) how you plan to travel (driving, hiking, flying),
(2) where you plan to shoot, and
(3) how much you value convenience vs. stability.

Do you also have a tripod already? It might work just fine.

Reply
Sep 18, 2018 18:36:02   #
imagemeister Loc: mid east Florida
 
Haleysnaps wrote:
For my amateur shooting, I would like something under 1K...ideally with any needed accessories. There are just so many options; thanks for the link.


If you are spending 1K, you do not need my advice ...... but I will say, you should spend a lot of time mastering a good monopod.

..

Reply
Sep 18, 2018 21:08:03   #
DaveO Loc: Northeast CT
 
imagemeister wrote:
If you are spending 1K, you do not need my advice ...... but I will say, you should spend a lot of time mastering a good monopod.

..



Reply
 
 
Sep 18, 2018 21:50:48   #
Notorious T.O.D. Loc: Harrisburg, North Carolina
 
So, am I to understand that you are saying you would put $10-$15k worth of camera gear on a $139 tripod? I guess in certain environments one could use a $1.39 hanger bolt and just screw the camera gear to a tree...

Bipod wrote:
Given your interests, I think you've got what you need already: a monopod. Especially since your camera is
lightweight (about 1.3 lbs with battery and without lens, I think) and has 5-axis inside image stabilization.

As I just posted on another thread, tripods are a compromise between maximum stability and minimum weight.
No single tripod can do all jobs. The particular "features" of a tripod are not as important as its particular compromise
it strikes between stability and weight.

Special requirements requiring more stability:
* windy conditions
* long exposures/low light
* telephoto
* macro (if you plan to shoot flowers, you'll need a tripod that can get down to flower level).

After about $130, additional money just buys reduced weight. That's important if you're going
to be carrying the tripod long distances--otherwise it's not. Don't think you have to have carbon fiber
or titanium just to keep up with the Jones. And the best way to buy tripods is used.

So it comes down to:
(1) how you plan to travel (driving, hiking, flying),
(2) where you plan to shoot, and
(3) how much you value convenience vs. stability.

Do you also have a tripod already? It might work just fine.
Given your interests, I think you've got what you ... (show quote)

Reply
Sep 18, 2018 22:17:16   #
Marionsho Loc: Kansas
 
DaveO wrote:
Yes, I'm a real genius as I search for my third and final one!



Reply
Sep 19, 2018 04:07:29   #
DaveO Loc: Northeast CT
 
Notorious T.O.D. wrote:
So, am I to understand that you are saying you would put $10-$15k worth of camera gear on a $139 tripod? I guess in certain environments one could use a $1.39 hanger bolt and just screw the camera gear to a tree...


Carbon fiber bolts are the way to go. They're lighter and absorb more vibration.

Reply
Sep 19, 2018 17:11:48   #
imagemeister Loc: mid east Florida
 
DaveO wrote:
Carbon fiber bolts are the way to go. They're lighter and absorb more vibration.




..

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 4 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.