Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Astronomical Photography Forum section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
Time to lighten up
Page <<first <prev 3 of 7 next> last>>
Sep 11, 2018 09:51:04   #
markwilliam1
 
So I went hiking the other day with my Sony RX10 M4. All I had was this camera and I walked around all day carrying it in my hand with only a wrist strap! It performed remarkably from macro to telephoto serving all my photographic needs. Normally I would have a camera backpack loaded with lenses and such weighting many pounds and filled with frustration. Sometimes a tripod also. I couldn’t be happier and I can hike longer now! It can’t be any simpler now.

Reply
Sep 11, 2018 09:56:35   #
markngolf Loc: Bridgewater, NJ
 
I'm sure you meant, iv and not vi. The IV is much improved over the III.
Mark
Rick0747 wrote:
Try the Sony RX10-iii or RX100-vi. Pricey but I love them. I do not think you will be disappointed.

Reply
Sep 11, 2018 10:38:17   #
jgangjr
 
I will also recommend the Sony RX10 IV.

I have a Nikon D5500 and a Tamron 18-270 that I used to use for walk around. The Sony is lighter and more versatile.

The Sony is not quite as good in low light, but it focuses much better/faster, has similar IQ, and is way better with video.

Reply
Check out Travel Photography - Tips and More section of our forum.
Sep 11, 2018 10:40:55   #
davyboy Loc: Anoka Mn.
 
timcc wrote:
Sony's APS-C line -- the a6000, a6300 and a6500 -- would meet all your requirements. I've had an a6000 for several years and love it, especially for travel.

PROS: Excellent IQ, lightweight, EVF, decent low-light performance, good selection of lenses, and reliable. You could get even better IQ and low-light performance with Sony's full-frame mirrorless line, but their lenses tend to weigh as much as DSLR lenses. Capture One has an outstanding post-processing program: a free version for Sony cameras, and a discounted pro version for Sony cameras.

CONS: The a6000 is not weather-resistant (not sure about the newer a6300 and a6500 models). The Sony menu system can appear a bit challenging at first sight, because it includes everything anyone might possibly want to tweak, but once you know which settings you normally adjust while shooting, it is easy to assign them to buttons or a quick menu on the back of the camera.

Micro 4/3 cameras are lighter, both in body and in lenses, but they have a substantially smaller sensor, so IQ and low-light performance may not be as good as the larger APS-C and full-frame cameras.
Fuji also makes an excellent APS-C camera, although it is slightly bigger and heavier than the Sony a6xxx line.

Bottom line: there are lots of very good cameras for you to choose from. Good luck!
Sony's APS-C line -- the a6000, a6300 and a6500 --... (show quote)

M 4/3 sensor is not that much smaller and you will not be able to see any difference in pic quality maybe low but not IQ

Reply
Sep 11, 2018 10:57:29   #
cdayton
 
I went from a D300 to a D5200 because of weight issues and can still use all my lenses. I also have a Sony a6000 but if you use anything but the pancake lens there is little, if any, weight advantage and it feels small with a really annoying menu system - I gave it to my wife to use as a point-and-shoot (she loves it).

Reply
Sep 11, 2018 11:01:15   #
burkphoto Loc: High Point, NC
 
sinderone wrote:
On my recent trip to Europe, I came to the conclusion that while I love the results, my D7100 plus lenses is just getting to heavy to shlep around. So now it’s time to decide what’s next. Point and shoot? 4/3’s? Mirrorless? My requirements are these; light, quality results close to my slr, a reasonably long zoom (minimally 200+mm), good low light results, a viewfinder and good reliability. I shoot mostly in aperture and shutter priority.

Suggestions plus pros and cons of each type?

Thanks in advance.
On my recent trip to Europe, I came to the conclus... (show quote)


Micro 4/3 system will be lightest.

Look at the Panasonic Lumix G9, the Lumix GH5, and the Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II.

A recently updated list of lenses that fit all Micro 4/3 cameras is here:

http://hazeghi.org/mft-lenses.html

Check DPReview.com for excellent reviews and analysis of all three cameras.

Reply
Sep 11, 2018 11:37:03   #
markwilliam1
 
M 4/3 sensor Cannot compete with the new sensor in the Sony RX10 M4. I’m only going by reviews of image quality that I’ve read. I don’t have a M 4/3 system. Don’t know the cost comparison But the Sony is Expensive! Just my opinion.

Reply
Check out Professional and Advanced Portraiture section of our forum.
Sep 11, 2018 11:48:29   #
hammond
 
Mirrorless will save you on size but you should be fully aware of the battery limitations. Depending on where you're traveling this may have more affect than you expect... case in point that I'm currently on a 10 day trek through Nepal with very unreliable access to power outlets. My DSLR has lasted 5 days on 2 batteries and my friend's Sony Mirrorless has been 2 days without power even though he started with 4 batteries ( = no pics).

Reply
Sep 11, 2018 11:58:32   #
olemikey Loc: 6 mile creek, Spacecoast Florida
 
hammond wrote:
Mirrorless will save you on size but you should be fully aware of the battery limitations. Depending on where you're traveling this may have more affect than you expect... case in point that I'm currently on a 10 day trek through Nepal with very unreliable access to power outlets. My DSLR has lasted 5 days on 2 batteries and my friend's Sony Mirrorless has been 2 days without power even though he started with 4 batteries ( = no pics).


Sounds like a small portable solar recharger should be on your "need" list!!

Reply
Sep 11, 2018 12:19:37   #
gwestfall Loc: Calabasas, Ca
 
I had the same problem. Bought a Leica M240. Use a 50mm f1.2 exclusively when traveling. Simple, elegant, superb results and camera stuff doesn’t intrude on the travel experience.

Reply
Sep 11, 2018 12:37:26   #
billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
 
sinderone wrote:
On my recent trip to Europe, I came to the conclusion that while I love the results, my D7100 plus lenses is just getting to heavy to shlep around. So now it’s time to decide what’s next. Point and shoot? 4/3’s? Mirrorless? My requirements are these; light, quality results close to my slr, a reasonably long zoom (minimally 200+mm), good low light results, a viewfinder and good reliability. I shoot mostly in aperture and shutter priority.

Suggestions plus pros and cons of each type?

Thanks in advance.
On my recent trip to Europe, I came to the conclus... (show quote)


Sony HX90V, pop up viewfinder for those outdoor shots. A 24-720 ZEISS T* lens (can't do better than Zeiss) This goes everywhere with me and gives me true DSLR results. I can print up to a 20X30 print with excellent results. And I put it one of these and it's safe and I am hands free. FREE HINT, this belt pouch, when you get it, put the HX90V in it and rubber band it for two days. It will then close to it's magnetic stops without issue. Great pouch.
https://www.adorama.com/inkcscpss.html?utm_medium=display&utm_source=criteo&utm_campaign=nikon

Reply
Check out Professional and Advanced Portraiture section of our forum.
Sep 11, 2018 12:43:00   #
drmike99 Loc: Fairfield Connecticut
 
sinderone wrote:
On my recent trip to Europe, I came to the conclusion that while I love the results, my D7100 plus lenses is just getting to heavy to shlep around. So now it’s time to decide what’s next. Point and shoot? 4/3’s? Mirrorless? My requirements are these; light, quality results close to my slr, a reasonably long zoom (minimally 200+mm), good low light results, a viewfinder and good reliability. I shoot mostly in aperture and shutter priority.

Suggestions plus pros and cons of each type?

Thanks in advance.
On my recent trip to Europe, I came to the conclus... (show quote)


If light weight is your goal then your answer is simple: Minox. Camera and a whole vacation’s supply of film in one pocket. To hell with the IQ!

Reply
Sep 11, 2018 13:19:32   #
markngolf Loc: Bridgewater, NJ
 
markwilliam1 wrote:
M 4/3 sensor Cannot compete with the new sensor in the Sony RX10 M4. I’m only going by reviews of image quality that I’ve read. I don’t have a M 4/3 system. Don’t know the cost comparison But the Sony is Expensive! Just my opinion.


It is expensive. However to get the same range of focal length would have required a minimum of 2 lenses. I had purchased 3. Total cost, including an adapter for my EF lenses was almost $1800. Almost a toss up of costs. I’m very happy with the Sony.
Mark.

Reply
Sep 11, 2018 13:35:36   #
le boecere
 
traderjohn wrote:
Good point.


Why is that a good point?

Reply
Sep 11, 2018 13:39:49   #
la_mapguy
 
I agree re: Sony RX10 iv - massive 24mm - 600mm optical zoom and very bright f2.4-4 lens

not especially compact but covers the range of a bunch of lenses. I've used the RX100 ii, iii & v a lot as well and love it as a super-compact but love the RX10. I use primarily for shooting concerts so I can definitely say the camera performs well in low light.

pricey camera but I couldn't be happier with it.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 7 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Travel Photography - Tips and More section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.