Gene51
Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
sinderone wrote:
On my recent trip to Europe, I came to the conclusion that while I love the results, my D7100 plus lenses is just getting to heavy to shlep around. So now it’s time to decide what’s next. Point and shoot? 4/3’s? Mirrorless? My requirements are these; light, quality results close to my slr, a reasonably long zoom (minimally 200+mm), good low light results, a viewfinder and good reliability. I shoot mostly in aperture and shutter priority.
Suggestions plus pros and cons of each type?
Thanks in advance.
On my recent trip to Europe, I came to the conclus... (
show quote)
As Markwilliam1 suggests, the Sony RX10M4.
I did the exact same thing you are contemplating, but my main cameras are D800s and a D810. The Sony is 2.5 lbs, and has an field of view equivalent to a 24-600mm lens, F2.8 - F4.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/gene_lugo/albums/72157697217633732https://www.flickr.com/photos/gene_lugo/albums/72157696606493264https://www.flickr.com/photos/gene_lugo/albums/72157667029395028https://www.flickr.com/photos/gene_lugo/albums/72157689083645890https://www.flickr.com/photos/gene_lugo/albums/72157694805547345https://www.flickr.com/photos/gene_lugo/albums/72157665487054018https://www.flickr.com/photos/gene_lugo/albums/72157693140571925https://www.flickr.com/photos/gene_lugo/albums/72157665486900208https://www.flickr.com/photos/gene_lugo/albums/72157690214837382
sinderone wrote:
On my recent trip to Europe, I came to the conclusion that while I love the results, my D7100 plus lenses is just getting to heavy to shlep around. So now it’s time to decide what’s next. Point and shoot? 4/3’s? Mirrorless? My requirements are these; light, quality results close to my slr, a reasonably long zoom (minimally 200+mm), good low light results, a viewfinder and good reliability. I shoot mostly in aperture and shutter priority.
Suggestions plus pros and cons of each type?
Thanks in advance.
On my recent trip to Europe, I came to the conclus... (
show quote)
Tom is an experienced professional travel photographer, who studies his recommendations, closely:
http://photoseek.com/2011/cameras-best-recommended-for-travel/
Nice post le! He also agrees on the Sony RX10 M4. Perfect for downsizing. It’s the Best camera I’ve ever owned!
wdross
Loc: Castle Rock, Colorado
sinderone wrote:
On my recent trip to Europe, I came to the conclusion that while I love the results, my D7100 plus lenses is just getting to heavy to shlep around. So now it’s time to decide what’s next. Point and shoot? 4/3’s? Mirrorless? My requirements are these; light, quality results close to my slr, a reasonably long zoom (minimally 200+mm), good low light results, a viewfinder and good reliability. I shoot mostly in aperture and shutter priority.
Suggestions plus pros and cons of each type?
Thanks in advance.
On my recent trip to Europe, I came to the conclus... (
show quote)
Moonhawk has given you good advice. The E-M1 mrII with the 12-100 f4 is an incredible system. Yes, it is not the only system. But it offers a selection of more than 100 lenses that will work on any Olympus or Panasonic body (yes, your second body can be from Panasonic with no lenses loss). I used that body / lens combination (E-M1 + 12-100) on a long bus tour across Germany and really needed nothing more in reality. Total weight for the combo: 2.49 pounds.
wdross
Loc: Castle Rock, Colorado
sinderone wrote:
On my recent trip to Europe, I came to the conclusion that while I love the results, my D7100 plus lenses is just getting to heavy to shlep around. So now it’s time to decide what’s next. Point and shoot? 4/3’s? Mirrorless? My requirements are these; light, quality results close to my slr, a reasonably long zoom (minimally 200+mm), good low light results, a viewfinder and good reliability. I shoot mostly in aperture and shutter priority.
Suggestions plus pros and cons of each type?
Thanks in advance.
On my recent trip to Europe, I came to the conclus... (
show quote)
Three more items about the E-M1 mrII plus 12-100 f4 combo: size is 5.3 X 3.6 X ~ 7 inches with 6.5 stops of image stabilization (very rare that I use a tripod anymore) and the system is weatherproof (no other rain gear required other than the combo itself). This is very hard to match or beat with any other system. This combo was meant for travel photography. If nothing else, rent the combo for a week.
sinderone wrote:
On my recent trip to Europe, I came to the conclusion that while I love the results, my D7100 plus lenses is just getting to heavy to shlep around. So now it’s time to decide what’s next. Point and shoot? 4/3’s? Mirrorless? My requirements are these; light, quality results close to my slr, a reasonably long zoom (minimally 200+mm), good low light results, a viewfinder and good reliability. I shoot mostly in aperture and shutter priority.
Suggestions plus pros and cons of each type?
Thanks in advance.
On my recent trip to Europe, I came to the conclus... (
show quote)
Keep the D7100 and use or get an 18-200MM Nikon lens. Lose the other stuff.
The 18-200 is my walk around/all purpose lens. I bought the 10-20 for a trip to Europe and love it. I was able to get shots in crowded, narrow street cities that the the 18 was just not wide enough for. However, as you know, even with just the walk around lens the 7100 is no featherweight. In the end everything is a trade off and I know I’ll have to compromise for size and weight.
I felt the same dilemma prior to my recent Danube river cruise. After much consideration and actual purchase and return of a Canon m50, I finally went with the Sony RX10 IV. I'm still learning and doubt I'll give up my 5D MIII or 7D MII, but I'm delighted with my choice of the Sony. It's seems to be only limited by my effort to learn. I'm getting there.
Mark
sinderone wrote:
On my recent trip to Europe, I came to the conclusion that while I love the results, my D7100 plus lenses is just getting to heavy to shlep around. So now it’s time to decide what’s next. Point and shoot? 4/3’s? Mirrorless? My requirements are these; light, quality results close to my slr, a reasonably long zoom (minimally 200+mm), good low light results, a viewfinder and good reliability. I shoot mostly in aperture and shutter priority.
Suggestions plus pros and cons of each type?
Thanks in advance.
On my recent trip to Europe, I came to the conclus... (
show quote)
I travel with a micro 4/3 camera, a wide prime for low light, and a tele zoom. Works for all my travels and fits in a pocketbook.
olemikey
Loc: 6 mile creek, Spacecoast Florida
I think you might be a good candidate for:
1. 18-400 or 18-300 zoom with the D7100 or
2. One of the smaller Nikon D5500 or 5600, or even the D34XX series with aforementioned lens.
You would retain a system (Nikon) that you already know, and (I don't know what type lens you already own) possibly retain usage of your lens collection (unless screw drive). They are smaller, cheaper and lighter, but very capable.
Try the Sony RX10-iii or RX100-vi. Pricey but I love them. I do not think you will be disappointed.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.