Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
16mm-35mm Canon lens ... take on trip for landscapes?
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
Aug 7, 2018 17:33:47   #
gmango85
 
Darn, I could have given you one

Reply
Aug 7, 2018 19:00:04   #
Linda S.
 
gmango85 wrote:
Darn, I could have given you one



Reply
Aug 8, 2018 00:42:37   #
Tex-s
 
Linda S. wrote:
Hello! I am a senior woman whose strength is less than when I started taking photos at age 8! An avid amateur. I am taking a trip to the Inner Passage/Alaska. Was going to bring Canon 5D M4, 24-105 mm and the Canon G3X with the 600 optical zoom. Also a travel tripod...carbon Sirui...carrying it all in a Think Tank Speed Racer 2. (They are amazing to work with...not affiliated). Taking the smaller camera as my older 5D broke on the first day of another amazing trip! Question is...is it redundant to take the 16-35 lens? Not whale watching...taking a helicopter to a glacier and then taking a dog sled ride. Also taking trips into towns and gardens. Any insights would be most appreciated. Thank you!
Hello! I am a senior woman whose strength is less ... (show quote)


I cannot speak to your preferences about post processing, but I have been known to shoot a 16mm (full frame) or 10mm (crop) in situations that really don't DEMAND that wide of a shot, but then correct the perspective in lightroom and/or photoshop to create an image that is more like a 20-22mm (FF) or 14mm(crop) than has very little warping and skewing at the edges. I liken it to carrying an umbrella if it might rain. If you find you NEED the umbrella, you are covered, but if you don't, you still get a great shot.

Reply
 
 
Aug 8, 2018 07:58:06   #
Linda S.
 
Tex-s wrote:
I cannot speak to your preferences about post processing, but I have been known to shoot a 16mm (full frame) or 10mm (crop) in situations that really don't DEMAND that wide of a shot, but then correct the perspective in lightroom and/or photoshop to create an image that is more like a 20-22mm (FF) or 14mm(crop) than has very little warping and skewing at the edges. I liken it to carrying an umbrella if it might rain. If you find you NEED the umbrella, you are covered, but if you don't, you still get a great shot.
I cannot speak to your preferences about post proc... (show quote)


Thank you. I use Photoshop Elements and am learning Lightroom now. I've decided to bring it after all...

Reply
Aug 8, 2018 23:33:48   #
Linda S.
 
Thank you everyone for all your help/suggestions and great photos! Decided to take the 16-35. Leaving tomorrow AM. Researched suggested settings for rain given it is forecast to rain all but one day! Linda

Reply
Aug 10, 2018 15:32:23   #
crazydaddio Loc: Toronto Ontario Canada
 
pmorin wrote:
I am including 2photos with this reply to help define my point. 1st is shot from a helicopter at the rear side window with an 18 mm focal length. The lens was an EF-S 18-200 3.5-5.6 IS. Not as good as the 16-35, but at that point it was what I had.
The 2nd is a shot from a Cessna 206 with the 16-35 L at the focal length of 16 mm, from 9000 ft. Lightly cropped for leveling.
The view you have and the shots you can take will depend on where you sit, which is always up to the pilot or loadmaster. I personally want as much width as I can get with the ability to zoom in if needed. But everyone has a different perspective when it comes to photos. I agree that the OP would get good photos with the 24-105. But the extra few mms can be useful too. Some shots will have aircraft features in them, but IMHO they help tell the story of the photograph.
And no, they do not allow people to take an extra bag.
I am including 2photos with this reply to help def... (show quote)


Nice photos !
A point of clarity, the OP has a 5Dmk4 which is FF.
The photos posted here at 18mm which are 24mm equivalent. (ie the 24-105 at the wide end on FF is the same as 18mm on an APS-C.)
...but your point is taken. And others have posted about cropping later (as long as your intention isnt to make a 20"x30" for closeup viewing). The 16-35 has great resolving capability so cropping
on the 30mp 5DmkIV will still leave enough sharp pixels for larger prints.

The key point remains, if you have to leave behind either the 24-105 of the 16-35.....the 16 gets the boot.
If you can bring them both, do it !
...however you most likely will not be changing lens in a heli (I was not allowed to even bring them on the heli in Hawaii) so you pick one and live with it.

Some have posted about using the 70-200mm. I had the 70-200mm 2.8 on my 5DmkIV and my wife had the 16-35mm on a 70D when we went in the Heli.
Most of the favorites were from @ 200mm. (Cruise ship, Waterfalls lava flowing into the ocean). Loved the wide shots but once you have 2-3, the rest are the same.
If the glaciers have waterfalls, crevasses, or there is wildlife like bears etc then the 200mm comes in handy.
Hence the 24-105 recommendation. YOu can still get the wide angle shot and get some length too....

Reply
Aug 10, 2018 16:02:21   #
Linda S.
 
crazydaddio wrote:
Nice photos !
A point of clarity, the OP has a 5Dmk4 which is FF.
The photos posted here at 18mm which are 24mm equivalent. (ie the 24-105 at the wide end on FF is the same as 18mm on an APS-C.)
...but your point is taken. And others have posted about cropping later (as long as your intention isnt to make a 20"x30" for closeup viewing). The 16-35 has great resolving capability so cropping
on the 30mp 5DmkIV will still leave enough sharp pixels for larger prints.

The key point remains, if you have to leave behind either the 24-105 of the 16-35.....the 16 gets the boot.
If you can bring them both, do it !
...however you most likely will not be changing lens in a heli (I was not allowed to even bring them on the heli in Hawaii) so you pick one and live with it.

Some have posted about using the 70-200mm. I had the 70-200mm 2.8 on my 5DmkIV and my wife had the 16-35mm on a 70D when we went in the Heli.
Most of the favorites were from @ 200mm. (Cruise ship, Waterfalls lava flowing into the ocean). Loved the wide shots but once you have 2-3, the rest are the same.
If the glaciers have waterfalls, crevasses, or there is wildlife like bears etc then the 200mm comes in handy.
Hence the 24-105 recommendation. YOu can still get the wide angle shot and get some length too....
Nice photos ! br A point of clarity, the OP has a ... (show quote)


I took both look lens,the Canon G3X and a travel tripod. Heavy but on smooth surfaces can drag the bag!

Thank you again everyone for all your suggestions. I learned great deal.

Reply
 
 
Aug 11, 2018 18:49:03   #
speters Loc: Grangeville/Idaho
 
Linda S. wrote:
Hello! I am a senior woman whose strength is less than when I started taking photos at age 8! An avid amateur. I am taking a trip to the Inner Passage/Alaska. Was going to bring Canon 5D M4, 24-105 mm and the Canon G3X with the 600 optical zoom. Also a travel tripod...carbon Sirui...carrying it all in a Think Tank Speed Racer 2. (They are amazing to work with...not affiliated). Taking the smaller camera as my older 5D broke on the first day of another amazing trip! Question is...is it redundant to take the 16-35 lens? Not whale watching...taking a helicopter to a glacier and then taking a dog sled ride. Also taking trips into towns and gardens. Any insights would be most appreciated. Thank you!
Hello! I am a senior woman whose strength is less ... (show quote)

I never understand these questions about taking a lens or not for a certain trip, espescially if someone already owns mentioned lens! If you already have said lens, you know what you get from it, how it handles, what sharpness to expect, etc. So there shouldn't be any questions!!

Reply
Sep 8, 2018 09:31:49   #
Linda S.
 
speters wrote:
I never understand these questions about taking a lens or not for a certain trip, espescially if someone already owns mentioned lens! If you already have said lens, you know what you get from it, how it handles, what sharpness to expect, etc. So there shouldn't be any questions!!


Normally, I would agree with you. But, I had just purchased the lens for it looked intriguing to use. So, everything you said above isn't applicable. As it happened, the helicopter ride/dogsled run were cancelled due to heavy fog. Did use the 16/35. Preferred the 24/105. Need more practice with the other lens!

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.