ole sarg wrote:
You people are foolish.
The argument is not about Reid. It is about Romney!
What is he hiding?
Romney wants to be President not Reid.
All Romney has to do to prove Reid wrong is release his tax returns. That will prove Harry is a liar!
Without the released returns, Harry is telling the truth that someone told him Romney has not paid taxes in 10 years.
Can you disprove the statement?
No more than you can prove it.
ole sarg wrote:
You people are foolish.
The argument is not about Reid. It is about Romney!
What is he hiding?
Romney wants to be President not Reid.
All Romney has to do to prove Reid wrong is release his tax returns. That will prove Harry is a liar!
Without the released returns, Harry is telling the truth that someone told him Romney has not paid taxes in 10 years.
Can you disprove the statement?
It is NOT about Romney.
It's about Dirty Harry making something out of nothing to take the attention off of the real issues.
Now you get real and make yourself useful and find something constructive to report. Harry is a liar and instigator as well as you are to keep this non-event an issue.
Well, a whole lot of independent voters who will decide the election are believing Mittens is hiding something.
I hope this just goes on and on and on and on and on......
ole sarg wrote:
You people are foolish.
The argument is not about Reid. It is about Romney!
What is he hiding?
Romney wants to be President not Reid.
All Romney has to do to prove Reid wrong is release his tax returns. That will prove Harry is a liar!
Without the released returns, Harry is telling the truth that someone told him Romney has not paid taxes in 10 years.
Can you disprove the statement?
Who cares, I'm just enjoying watching them whine!
ole sarg wrote:
You people are foolish.
The argument is not about Reid. It is about Romney!
What is he hiding?
Romney wants to be President not Reid.
All Romney has to do to prove Reid wrong is release his tax returns. That will prove Harry is a liar!y
Without the released returns, Harry is telling the truth that someone told him Romney has not paid taxes in 10 years.
Can you disprove the statement?
Sarg, you are the foolish one. In this country one is innocent until proven guilty. The burden of proof lies with the accuser. The accused does not have to prove their innocence. Until harry proves that what he said is true then he is a liar. And one cannot testify to what he has heard second or third hand, a little thing called hearsay. DON'T YOU HATE THEM FACTS?
Are you saying that someone told Ried that Mittens did not pay his taxes?
If so, I think you will lose that one.
If Mittens did pay taxes show us the proof!
What is he hiding?
dtcracer wrote:
ole sarg wrote:
You people are foolish.
The argument is not about Reid. It is about Romney!
What is he hiding?
Romney wants to be President not Reid.
All Romney has to do to prove Reid wrong is release his tax returns. That will prove Harry is a liar!y
Without the released returns, Harry is telling the truth that someone told him Romney has not paid taxes in 10 years.
Can you disprove the statement?
Sarg, you are the foolish one. In this country one is innocent until proven guilty. The burden of proof lies with the accuser. The accused does not have to prove their innocence. Until harry proves that what he said is true then he is a liar. And one cannot testify to what he has heard second or third hand, a little thing called hearsay. DON'T YOU HATE THEM FACTS?
quote=ole sarg You people are foolish. br br The... (
show quote)
In a court of law, you are innocent until proven guilty. In the court of public opinion, Romney is screwed.
By your logic Harry Reid is innocent until proven guilty!!!!
Damn facts!
ole sarg wrote:
Are you saying that someone told Ried that Mittens did not pay his taxes?
If so, I think you will lose that one.
If Mittens did pay taxes show us the proof!
What is he hiding?
No, sarg, you are the one who said that someone told Reid that Mitt Romney had not paid taxes. Have you already forgot what you had stated in your previous post???
micro wrote:
dtcracer wrote:
ole sarg wrote:
You people are foolish.
The argument is not about Reid. It is about Romney!
What is he hiding?
Romney wants to be President not Reid.
All Romney has to do to prove Reid wrong is release his tax returns. That will prove Harry is a liar!y
Without the released returns, Harry is telling the truth that someone told him Romney has not paid taxes in 10 years.
Can you disprove the statement?
Sarg, you are the foolish one. In this country one is innocent until proven guilty. The burden of proof lies with the accuser. The accused does not have to prove their innocence. Until harry proves that what he said is true then he is a liar. And one cannot testify to what he has heard second or third hand, a little thing called hearsay. DON'T YOU HATE THEM FACTS?
quote=ole sarg You people are foolish. br br The... (
show quote)
In a court of law, you are innocent until proven guilty. In the court of public opinion, Romney is screwed.
By your logic Harry Reid is innocent until proven guilty!!!!
Damn facts!
quote=dtcracer quote=ole sarg You people are foo... (
show quote)
How is Harry innocent when he is the one who said it? He is guilty of lying, unless he can prove what he is saying is true. The burden of proof lies with him.
It is amazing how you and ole sarg construe things that are said to suit your agenda. Even to the point of denying something that you said when you cannot find a decent retort. Both of you have lost any (what little you did have) crediblity you may have had in my opinion. By the way, you never did show me if you had learned how to read...
dtcracer wrote:
micro wrote:
dtcracer wrote:
ole sarg wrote:
You people are foolish.
The argument is not about Reid. It is about Romney!
What is he hiding?
Romney wants to be President not Reid.
All Romney has to do to prove Reid wrong is release his tax returns. That will prove Harry is a liar!y
Without the released returns, Harry is telling the truth that someone told him Romney has not paid taxes in 10 years.
Can you disprove the statement?
Sarg, you are the foolish one. In this country one is innocent until proven guilty. The burden of proof lies with the accuser. The accused does not have to prove their innocence. Until harry proves that what he said is true then he is a liar. And one cannot testify to what he has heard second or third hand, a little thing called hearsay. DON'T YOU HATE THEM FACTS?
quote=ole sarg You people are foolish. br br The... (
show quote)
In a court of law, you are innocent until proven guilty. In the court of public opinion, Romney is screwed.
By your logic Harry Reid is innocent until proven guilty!!!!
Damn facts!
quote=dtcracer quote=ole sarg You people are foo... (
show quote)
How is Harry innocent when he is the one who said it? He is guilty of lying, unless he can prove what he is saying is true. The burden of proof lies with him.
It is amazing how you and ole sarg construe things that are said to suit your agenda. Even to the point of denying something that you said when you cannot find a decent retort. Both of you have lost any (what little you did have) crediblity you may have had in my opinion. By the way, you never did show me if you had learned how to read...
quote=micro quote=dtcracer quote=ole sarg You p... (
show quote)
If you're calling Reid a liar, then the burden of proof is with you. What's good for the goose is good for the gander. Simple concept.
However, that is a legal standard, none of this is in court. Every day that this goes on is a loss for Romney, because it distracts from his campaing message. Which raises the question, why doesn't Romney put an end to this by releasing his tax records?
micro wrote:
dtcracer wrote:
micro wrote:
dtcracer wrote:
ole sarg wrote:
You people are foolish.
The argument is not about Reid. It is about Romney!
What is he hiding?
Romney wants to be President not Reid.
All Romney has to do to prove Reid wrong is release his tax returns. That will prove Harry is a liar!y
Without the released returns, Harry is telling the truth that someone told him Romney has not paid taxes in 10 years.
Can you disprove the statement?
Sarg, you are the foolish one. In this country one is innocent until proven guilty. The burden of proof lies with the accuser. The accused does not have to prove their innocence. Until harry proves that what he said is true then he is a liar. And one cannot testify to what he has heard second or third hand, a little thing called hearsay. DON'T YOU HATE THEM FACTS?
quote=ole sarg You people are foolish. br br The... (
show quote)
In a court of law, you are innocent until proven guilty. In the court of public opinion, Romney is screwed.
By your logic Harry Reid is innocent until proven guilty!!!!
Damn facts!
quote=dtcracer quote=ole sarg You people are foo... (
show quote)
How is Harry innocent when he is the one who said it? He is guilty of lying, unless he can prove what he is saying is true. The burden of proof lies with him.
It is amazing how you and ole sarg construe things that are said to suit your agenda. Even to the point of denying something that you said when you cannot find a decent retort. Both of you have lost any (what little you did have) crediblity you may have had in my opinion. By the way, you never did show me if you had learned how to read...
quote=micro quote=dtcracer quote=ole sarg You p... (
show quote)
If you're calling Reid a liar, then the burden of proof is with you. What's good for the goose is good for the gander. Simple concept.
However, that is a legal standard, none of this is in court. Every day that this goes on is a loss for Romney, because it distracts from his campaing message. Which raises the question, why doesn't Romney put an end to this by releasing his tax records?
quote=dtcracer quote=micro quote=dtcracer quot... (
show quote)
LOL I got a bigger kick out of Pelosi's retort.... "Harry Reid is not lying, someone did tell him that.."
This is the democratic leadership in congress hard at work....
micro wrote:
dtcracer wrote:
micro wrote:
dtcracer wrote:
ole sarg wrote:
You people are foolish.
The argument is not about Reid. It is about Romney!
What is he hiding?
Romney wants to be President not Reid.
All Romney has to do to prove Reid wrong is release his tax returns. That will prove Harry is a liar!y
Without the released returns, Harry is telling the truth that someone told him Romney has not paid taxes in 10 years.
Can you disprove the statement?
Sarg, you are the foolish one. In this country one is innocent until proven guilty. The burden of proof lies with the accuser. The accused does not have to prove their innocence. Until harry proves that what he said is true then he is a liar. And one cannot testify to what he has heard second or third hand, a little thing called hearsay. DON'T YOU HATE THEM FACTS?
quote=ole sarg You people are foolish. br br The... (
show quote)
In a court of law, you are innocent until proven guilty. In the court of public opinion, Romney is screwed.
By your logic Harry Reid is innocent until proven guilty!!!!
Damn facts!
quote=dtcracer quote=ole sarg You people are foo... (
show quote)
How is Harry innocent when he is the one who said it? He is guilty of lying, unless he can prove what he is saying is true. The burden of proof lies with him.
It is amazing how you and ole sarg construe things that are said to suit your agenda. Even to the point of denying something that you said when you cannot find a decent retort. Both of you have lost any (what little you did have) crediblity you may have had in my opinion. By the way, you never did show me if you had learned how to read...
quote=micro quote=dtcracer quote=ole sarg You p... (
show quote)
If you're calling Reid a liar, then the burden of proof is with you. What's good for the goose is good for the gander. Simple concept.
However, that is a legal standard, none of this is in court. Every day that this goes on is a loss for Romney, because it distracts from his campaing message. Which raises the question, why doesn't Romney put an end to this by releasing his tax records?
quote=dtcracer quote=micro quote=dtcracer quot... (
show quote)
Incorrect. Reid made the allegation, the burden of proof is on him. He accused Romney of an illegal act, therefore he has to prove what he alleged.
Romney is doing a great job of discrediting himself.
1. He refuses to talk about his governorship because of Romneycare.
2. He does not speak about the Olympics because he took $1.2 billion in federal funds.
3. He will not release his tax returns because who knows why.
But, as of now the campaign issue is: What is Romney hiding?
That is just pure politics not left or right, dem or rep.
Blurryeyed wrote:
micro wrote:
dtcracer wrote:
micro wrote:
dtcracer wrote:
ole sarg wrote:
You people are foolish.
The argument is not about Reid. It is about Romney!
What is he hiding?
Romney wants to be President not Reid.
All Romney has to do to prove Reid wrong is release his tax returns. That will prove Harry is a liar!y
Without the released returns, Harry is telling the truth that someone told him Romney has not paid taxes in 10 years.
Can you disprove the statement?
Sarg, you are the foolish one. In this country one is innocent until proven guilty. The burden of proof lies with the accuser. The accused does not have to prove their innocence. Until harry proves that what he said is true then he is a liar. And one cannot testify to what he has heard second or third hand, a little thing called hearsay. DON'T YOU HATE THEM FACTS?
quote=ole sarg You people are foolish. br br The... (
show quote)
In a court of law, you are innocent until proven guilty. In the court of public opinion, Romney is screwed.
By your logic Harry Reid is innocent until proven guilty!!!!
Damn facts!
quote=dtcracer quote=ole sarg You people are foo... (
show quote)
How is Harry innocent when he is the one who said it? He is guilty of lying, unless he can prove what he is saying is true. The burden of proof lies with him.
It is amazing how you and ole sarg construe things that are said to suit your agenda. Even to the point of denying something that you said when you cannot find a decent retort. Both of you have lost any (what little you did have) crediblity you may have had in my opinion. By the way, you never did show me if you had learned how to read...
quote=micro quote=dtcracer quote=ole sarg You p... (
show quote)
If you're calling Reid a liar, then the burden of proof is with you. What's good for the goose is good for the gander. Simple concept.
However, that is a legal standard, none of this is in court. Every day that this goes on is a loss for Romney, because it distracts from his campaing message. Which raises the question, why doesn't Romney put an end to this by releasing his tax records?
quote=dtcracer quote=micro quote=dtcracer quot... (
show quote)
LOL I got a bigger kick out of Pelosi's retort.... "Harry Reid is not lying, someone did tell him that.."
This is the democratic leadership in congress hard at work....
quote=micro quote=dtcracer quote=micro quote=d... (
show quote)
And I'll bet SHE couldn't identify the alleged person who allegedly said this to Reid, either!
dtcracer wrote:
micro wrote:
dtcracer wrote:
micro wrote:
dtcracer wrote:
ole sarg wrote:
You people are foolish.
The argument is not about Reid. It is about Romney!
What is he hiding?
Romney wants to be President not Reid.
All Romney has to do to prove Reid wrong is release his tax returns. That will prove Harry is a liar!y
Without the released returns, Harry is telling the truth that someone told him Romney has not paid taxes in 10 years.
Can you disprove the statement?
Sarg, you are the foolish one. In this country one is innocent until proven guilty. The burden of proof lies with the accuser. The accused does not have to prove their innocence. Until harry proves that what he said is true then he is a liar. And one cannot testify to what he has heard second or third hand, a little thing called hearsay. DON'T YOU HATE THEM FACTS?
quote=ole sarg You people are foolish. br br The... (
show quote)
In a court of law, you are innocent until proven guilty. In the court of public opinion, Romney is screwed.
By your logic Harry Reid is innocent until proven guilty!!!!
Damn facts!
quote=dtcracer quote=ole sarg You people are foo... (
show quote)
How is Harry innocent when he is the one who said it? He is guilty of lying, unless he can prove what he is saying is true. The burden of proof lies with him.
It is amazing how you and ole sarg construe things that are said to suit your agenda. Even to the point of denying something that you said when you cannot find a decent retort. Both of you have lost any (what little you did have) crediblity you may have had in my opinion. By the way, you never did show me if you had learned how to read...
quote=micro quote=dtcracer quote=ole sarg You p... (
show quote)
If you're calling Reid a liar, then the burden of proof is with you. What's good for the goose is good for the gander. Simple concept.
However, that is a legal standard, none of this is in court. Every day that this goes on is a loss for Romney, because it distracts from his campaing message. Which raises the question, why doesn't Romney put an end to this by releasing his tax records?
quote=dtcracer quote=micro quote=dtcracer quot... (
show quote)
Incorrect. Reid made the allegation, the burden of proof is on him. He accused Romney of an illegal act, therefore he has to prove what he alleged.
quote=micro quote=dtcracer quote=micro quote=d... (
show quote)
Once again, this is not in a court of law.
My other point doesn't seem to impress you, so let's stick with the first.
I hope Romney never agrees, and this contriversy will follow him right up to the election. It doesn't matter what you or I believe, we already know who we're voting for. I don't believe that the independant voter is worrying if Harry Reid is lying (possibly in NV), I believe they are interested in who the Presidential candidate is.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.