Would this be adequate for a Nikon 200 to 500 mm lens. I have an arca Ball Head.
Yes. I have one and use it with that lens. It's a lot lighter than a full size Wimberly, but you still need your ball head or its equivalent which adds to the weight. With a full size Wimberley you don't need your ball head. I just bought a full gimbal head, Promaster, doesn't need a ball head, which is very light weight, 1 1/2 lbs. very smooth and I like it better.
Archiefamous wrote:
Would this be adequate for a Nikon 200 to 500 mm lens. I have an arca Ball Head.
The ability of not needing to change heads is very appealing. Thanks
Well, my original idea was to use a Sidekick with a quick release plate attached to my ball head. That way I could detach it when I wanted to use normal lenses and just use the ball head very quickly. So I used it that way for about 3-4 years. Then I found one of the newer, stronger, lighter dedicated gimbals which saved me 1 1/2 lbs. in weight so I am going with that now. Not as versatile an option but one that is lighter and smoother.
I tried the sidekick but went to a regular gimbal easier to use and one piece less to carry
Robertl594
Loc: Bloomfield Hills, Michigan and Nantucket
Is this the same one? Detroit Zoo. Nice shot!
I've been using a Sidekick for over 15 years... Works great!
I don't have that lens, but I've used it often with a couple that are larger and heavier. No problems.
I have a full size gimbal on another tripod. But for it's versatility, the first one I always grab is the one with the Sidekick.
A side benefit of the Sidekick is that - thanks to the Arca-Swiss side mount - a camera w/short lens can be mounted in vertical orientation (so long as the camera has an Arca plate). Can't do that with a full size, bottom mount gimbal. In fact, you need another accessory to be able to mount a short lens (without tripod ring) at all.
That said, I guess we're supposed to add a lemur pic?
All good points. Probably wind up with both eventually
If your Arca-Swiss Head is adequate then you’ll love the sidekick. I use one when traveling. I use mine with a 150-600mm and a 500mm f/4 and have never been disappointed. I use my sidekick on a RRS BH-55 head. Oh yes, I must tell you I also have a full Wimberly Gimbal that I use often but not when traveling. Have fun.
Thanks. Looks like the same guy, around the corner from the tiger? I shot mine with the 200-500mm, probably not at the 500 end. I was surprised at how often I've been usng a focal length of Less than the full 500mm with that lens.
Yes, the sidekick and ball head with one tripod is probably a good all-around travel item.
Robertl594 wrote:
Is this the same one? Detroit Zoo. Nice shot!
Nice detail, exposure, color eyes, etc.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.