Check out Software and Computer Support for Photographers section of our forum.
lens suggestions
Jul 2, 2018 13:16:17 #
Opt for the screw in close up filters to start with. A 3 or 4 pack costs under $30 on ebay. Most people cannot tell the fine differences from using the close up filters vs macro lens. Try them out and see if you like doing close up work. I have used these filters for over 30 yrs until I finally bought a used dedicated 90mm for FF. I shoot mostly landscapes so I would go for the close up filters and then get the Sigma 10-20mm or 8-16mm wide angle zoom.
Jul 2, 2018 13:16:52 #
Jul 2, 2018 13:26:19 #
Check out The Dynamics of Photographic Lighting section of our forum.
Jul 2, 2018 15:13:49 #
Jul 2, 2018 18:29:56 #
I bought the Tamron 18-400 for the same camera. Great lens and it can do so much!
Jul 2, 2018 21:25:57 #
Ken Rockwell has a review of the Nikor 40mm F2.8. He says it's a good all purpose lens but is not a good macro lens. DavidB1879
Jul 2, 2018 21:28:59 #
Check out The Pampered Pets Corner section of our forum.
Jul 3, 2018 00:26:32 #
I recently bought a Nikon 105mm f2.8 used from a gentleman in Japan ( I know, I took a chance), for $129.00. Crystal clear. He rated it on eBay as “near mint”, and it is. I love the lens. There are many more on eBay. I’ve purchase a few such lenses from Japan, and have yet to be burned. I saved a lot of money, and have a beautiful lens to show for it. Older, all metal construction. Tack sharp. I was hoping he would have another lens that I would’ve been interested in, but unfortunately he didn’t.
Jul 3, 2018 16:40:51 #
GoofyNewfie wrote:
The 40mm would be a poorer cboice for traditional portrait work with a 60mm equivalent length.
Nikon’s 60mm micro would be a better choice for both macro and portraits with a FF equivalent of 90mm. https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/545660-USA/Nikon_2177_AF_S_Micro_Nikkor_60mm_f_2_8G.html
I think Sigma has a 70mm macro, giving the FF equivalent right in the so-called ideal length of 105mm
Doesn’t make sense to me to have 2 lenses, 5 mm apart.
Nikon’s 60mm micro would be a better choice for both macro and portraits with a FF equivalent of 90mm. https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/545660-USA/Nikon_2177_AF_S_Micro_Nikkor_60mm_f_2_8G.html
I think Sigma has a 70mm macro, giving the FF equivalent right in the so-called ideal length of 105mm
Doesn’t make sense to me to have 2 lenses, 5 mm apart.
I agree. I have the 35f1.8 and the Tokina macro.
Jul 4, 2018 18:36:31 #
If you want to purchase a macro lens, the best macro lens would be a 105mm. Try KEH or other used camera equipment websites. Frankly, if you buy the correct attachments, you can turn your 18=55 mm into a macro by installing it on to the camera backwards. Another place to watch for lens is a pawn shop. I purchased a Nikon DX 18-200 mm auto focus for $190.00. When I got home, I looked up retail price of $996.00 AIf you choose to check out a pawn shop, take your camera with to try the lens before buying it. Some great deals can be had. Dosperros
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Traditional Street and Architectural Photography section of our forum.