Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
The Attic
Why did Time magazine feel it had to be dishonest???
Page 1 of 19 next> last>>
Jun 23, 2018 06:41:43   #
traderjohn Loc: New York City
 
https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/crying-honduran-girl-cover-time-153910365.html

Reply
Jun 23, 2018 06:57:13   #
incognito
 
I guess they didn't want to be known as the competition to Charmin. So they tried to wipe it off but instead they just smeared it all over their face. But as one person said if you throw enough sh-- against the wall some of it is bound to stick.

Reply
Jun 23, 2018 06:58:58   #
dpullum Loc: Tampa Florida
 
Real or not real the photograph [manufactured image in this case] is a message that in too many instances is real. It says that Trump did not consider the children to be real human beings...just tools. When dealing with decisions it is a chess game, one move makes many possible future consequences. The playing of chess based on impulse not thinking ahead will probably lead to loosing the game.

It is difficult to unscramble eggs... it may be very very difficult to find the parent child paring... or it may be that if you were separated from a 7 year old boy child... OK we will give you a 7 year old boy... perhaps not the one that was your child...

Again the image is to give a message... who the child is does not mater, the message is the image statement ... statement that children are real and the president does not realize or care.

Reply
 
 
Jun 23, 2018 07:04:26   #
traderjohn Loc: New York City
 
dpullum wrote:
Real or not real the photograph [manufactured image in this case] is a message that in too many instances is real. It says that Trump did not consider the children to be real human beings...just tools. When dealing with decisions it is a chess game, one move makes many possible future consequences. The playing of chess based on impulse not thinking ahead will probably lead to loosing the game.

It is difficult to unscramble eggs... it may be very very difficult to find the parent child paring... or it may be that if you were separated from a 7 year old boy child... OK we will give you a 7 year old boy... perhaps not the one that was your child...

Again the image is to give a message... who the child is does not mater, the message is the image statement ... statement that children are real and the president does not realize or care.
Real or not real the photograph manufactured imag... (show quote)


OK...so you think it's alright to be deceptive.

Reply
Jun 23, 2018 07:10:59   #
incognito
 
dpullum wrote:
Real or not real the photograph [manufactured image in this case] is a message that in too many instances is real. It says that Trump did not consider the children to be real human beings...just tools. When dealing with decisions it is a chess game, one move makes many possible future consequences. The playing of chess based on impulse not thinking ahead will probably lead to loosing the game.

It is difficult to unscramble eggs... it may be very very difficult to find the parent child paring... or it may be that if you were separated from a 7 year old boy child... OK we will give you a 7 year old boy... perhaps not the one that was your child...

Again the image is to give a message... who the child is does not mater, the message is the image statement ... statement that children are real and the president does not realize or care.
Real or not real the photograph manufactured imag... (show quote)
And that would be fine and dandy if it was posted alone without an erroneous story to go with it. So why did they make up the story in the first place? Pushing the liberal agenda? Btw your speculation as to giving the wrong child to the wrong parent mostly happens in hospitals. Your speculation is just another way the liberals use to enrage people.

Reply
Jun 23, 2018 07:17:22   #
slocumeddie Loc: Inside your head, again
 
dpullum wrote:
Real or not real the photograph [manufactured image in this case] is a message that in too many instances is real. It says that Trump did not consider the children to be real human beings...just tools. When dealing with decisions it is a chess game, one move makes many possible future consequences. The playing of chess based on impulse not thinking ahead will probably lead to loosing the game.

It is difficult to unscramble eggs... it may be very very difficult to find the parent child paring... or it may be that if you were separated from a 7 year old boy child... OK we will give you a 7 year old boy... perhaps not the one that was your child...

Again the image is to give a message... who the child is does not mater, the message is the image statement ... statement that children are real and the president does not realize or care.
Real or not real the photograph manufactured imag... (show quote)

What the photograph "says"..........and what "is" are very different. This is anti-Trump and anti-American propaganda.....

You have interpreted it to fit your opinion(agenda ?)

Your opinion does not make it so..........

Reply
Jun 23, 2018 07:46:07   #
Black Bart Loc: Indiana
 
slocumeddie wrote:
What the photograph "says"..........and what "is" are very different. This is anti-Trump and anti-American propaganda.....

You have interpreted it to fit your opinion(agenda ?)

Your opinion does not make it so..........



Reply
 
 
Jun 23, 2018 09:25:53   #
mwalsh Loc: Houston
 
If there are so many true examples, why did they have to make one up?

Reply
Jun 23, 2018 09:37:07   #
Frank T Loc: New York, NY
 
The image on the cover of Time never represented itself as a true image. It was obviously a composite and was put there to make a point. If you recall Time magazine covers in the past, this is a normal practice.
The job of the cover is to sell the magazine. The job of the buyer is to actually read it.

Reply
Jun 23, 2018 09:52:37   #
incognito
 
Frank T wrote:
The image on the cover of Time never represented itself as a true image. It was obviously a composite and was put there to make a point. If you recall Time magazine covers in the past, this is a normal practice.
The job of the cover is to sell the magazine. The job of the buyer is to actually read it.

It is also the job of the media to present the truth. And to label fiction as fiction. This was not done for this article.

Reply
Jun 23, 2018 10:04:09   #
Frank T Loc: New York, NY
 
incognito wrote:
It is also the job of the media to present the truth. And to label fiction as fiction. This was not done for this article.


Okay, So here's a real photo on Time Magazine. Do you like it?



Reply
 
 
Jun 23, 2018 10:10:42   #
Texcaster Loc: Queensland
 
Frank T wrote:
Okay, So here's a real photo on Time Magazine. Do you like it?


This has been a very popular photo with the meme people.



Reply
Jun 23, 2018 10:17:11   #
EyeSawYou
 
Frank T wrote:
The image on the cover of Time never represented itself as a true image. It was obviously a composite and was put there to make a point. If you recall Time magazine covers in the past, this is a normal practice.
The job of the cover is to sell the magazine. The job of the buyer is to actually read it.


So Time Magazine did the same thing with Obama with separating children and in some cases placed immigrant children with human traffickers? Not sure if I saw that image cover.

Reply
Jun 23, 2018 10:20:22   #
EyeSawYou
 
Frank T wrote:
The image on the cover of Time never represented itself as a true image. It was obviously a composite and was put there to make a point. If you recall Time magazine covers in the past, this is a normal practice.
The job of the cover is to sell the magazine. The job of the buyer is to actually read it.


You would be singing a totally different tune if they did this same image and story with Obama. But in all fairness, many Republicans with sing a different tune as well if that were the case.

Reply
Jun 23, 2018 11:08:19   #
traderjohn Loc: New York City
 
Frank T wrote:
Okay, So here's a real photo on Time Magazine. Do you like it?


Did your parents have any children that were not, shall we say ...challenged?
You dear boy, have allowed hatred to be your guiding light. It's really sad. You still have years in front of you. I don't know how you can sustain this level of hatred. You really need a life. You have allowed your hatred to consume you. Be someone. Improve yourself., Do something productive. I think it has to hurt to be you. So single track. Lurking in the shadows waiting and waiting.

Reply
Page 1 of 19 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
The Attic
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.