Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Digital Artistry section of our forum.
Photo Gallery
Sharp sometimes over rated
Jun 17, 2018 13:18:15   #
Kuzano
 
Always expensive. How much $$$ is spent to buy Sharp for images.

Is sharp always a goal?


(Download)


(Download)

Reply
Jun 17, 2018 13:19:06   #
CJ2
 
Not really!!!

Reply
Jun 17, 2018 13:20:52   #
CJ2
 
But u better be able to realize what should be sharp, and what can enhance the subject by being soft, or high bokeh.

Reply
 
 
Jun 17, 2018 13:28:49   #
Kuzano
 
CJ2 wrote:
But u better be able to realize what should be sharp, and what can enhance the subject by being soft, or high bokeh.


True, and those distinctions in composition are the enhancements performed by versatile photographers. I'm not saying these two examples are indicative of good photography. They are indicative of a differing viewpoint on composition, however. If I had not clipped a couple of petals, I'd print and hang them.

Reply
Jun 17, 2018 13:42:22   #
BassmanBruce Loc: Middle of the Mitten
 
Kuzano wrote:


Is sharp always a goal?


No, but like any other tool it’s better to have it and not need it than versey vicey.
(Meaning I’d rather have a sharp lense and focus it as I see fit)

Reply
Jun 17, 2018 14:11:53   #
IBM
 
The goal is to achieve what your looking for in the image , did you??

Reply
Jun 17, 2018 14:42:50   #
rgrenaderphoto Loc: Hollywood, CA
 
Kuzano wrote:
Always expensive. How much $$$ is spent to buy Sharp for images.

Is sharp always a goal?


For your image, sharp is not the issue. The issue is the shallow depth of field making parts of the flower in and out of focus. Step farther back to get all of your subject in focus, or pratice doing focus sacking images..

Sharp and blur are two different issues.

Reply
Check out Software and Computer Support for Photographers section of our forum.
Jun 17, 2018 14:56:16   #
CJ2
 
focus stacking images

Reply
Jun 18, 2018 01:40:36   #
IBM
 
Kuzano wrote:
True, and those distinctions in composition are the enhancements performed by versatile photographers. I'm not saying these two examples are indicative of good photography. They are indicative of a differing viewpoint on composition, however. If I had not clipped a couple of petals, I'd print and hang them.

Photo
Right and what you think is indicative of good photographs may not be what others think ,different strokes for each person
The only way to tell if it's a good photograph is if the majority of those who judge it say it's good , the way the dog shows are
Judged is no sense at all it's just tradition , one over weight old farts who can barely stand up . Passes a blue ribon to the
Ugliest flat nose pug , I here by pronounce you best in show , give me a brake , they should have at least ten pro , judges and
They write unseen by all the other judges there pick , and when then count , the mutt that is picked by the judges the most
Wins , it may take more judges ,but it can be done , same as a photo contest , what if they judged a golf game like that ,
Some of the pros, would never win , one judge is nowhere close enough to judge a photo contest ,

Reply
Jun 18, 2018 11:49:56   #
zzzynick Loc: Colorado
 
Yes sharp is my goal. I would have deleted those.

Reply
Jun 18, 2018 12:13:43   #
rgrenaderphoto Loc: Hollywood, CA
 
As a rule, I never use the sharpening slider in Lightroom. It is too easy to overdoo and produce a "crunchy" look.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Traditional Street and Architectural Photography section of our forum.
Photo Gallery
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.