Nikon 80-200 / f2.8 D vs. G?
Jun 7, 2018 07:51:21 #
RWR wrote:
With 5 ED elements (vs. 3 for the others), the Nikon ED AF-S 80~200mm 1:2.8 D produces the best image quality. Plus, the built-in focus motor is faster and quieter.
Any references for this?
Jun 7, 2018 08:24:17 #
That iteration is no longer produced since Nikon brought out the AFS 70-200. They still manufacture & sell the last iteration of the 80-200 F2.8 AF that uses the in-camera focus motor though. I have that one, a two ring model that (to me) is just as sharp as the AFS version. Never saw a need for VR on any of my lenses (although I do have it on a couple), but that's due to what I shoot more than anything else. A word of caution if you are considering the AFS version of the 80-200 is that I have read that Nikon no longer is able to replace the AFS motor should it go bad. Might be worth a call to Nikon to verify that though.
RWR wrote:
With 5 ED elements (vs. 3 for the others), the Nikon ED AF-S 80~200mm 1:2.8 D produces the best image quality. Plus, the built-in focus motor is faster and quieter.
Jun 7, 2018 10:04:49 #
Jun 7, 2018 10:14:07 #
jeryh
Loc: Oxfordshire UK
I have the D3, and also the D300s; I find that the G' versions of lenses, whilst being marginally quicker, are, in my opinion, not as good as the old AF D lenses. I like being able to choose my F stop on the barrel of the lens, rather than hunt for it. My 300 F4 AF-S lens is probably
one of the sharpest 'old' nikkors I own.
one of the sharpest 'old' nikkors I own.
Jun 7, 2018 10:49:53 #
Jun 7, 2018 11:17:56 #
The 80-200 D is a classic Nikkor lens that’s made in Japan, built like a tank with excellent image quality...and even includes a built-in metal lens hood. Nikon has been selling this lens since 1997, which is a good indicator that it has withstood the test of time. Compared to the alternative 70-200 G models, it’s significantly less expensive, new or used. I love it, even though it’s slightly slower to auto-focus than the newer 70-200’s, and doesn’t have VR. But in terms of overall build quality and value for the money, I’d go with the classic 80-200 if I had to choose.
Jun 7, 2018 11:37:52 #
RWR
Loc: La Mesa, CA
Screamin Scott wrote:
That iteration is no longer produced since Nikon b... (show quote)
I think the AF-S version has a little better contrast, though in comparing inkjet prints I doubt anyone could see a difference. Maybe on a test bench. I also have the current two-ring 80~200 f/2.8D, #1087835, and agree - it’s sharp enough for any size prints or any amount of cropping I’ll be doing.
Jun 7, 2018 11:43:47 #
The 80-200 2.8D is one older Nikon lens I will not update. I got mine from our local Nikon Rep Bill Koter when I was still shooting film. It was his sample which I bought rather than return. It was amazingly sharp then and it still is to this day.
Jun 7, 2018 11:50:29 #
I think I have owned every 80-200 (and 70-200) lens Nikon has ever made! I remember the 80-200/2.8D well and it was a superior lens in its time. It's still an excellent lens, and usually a good buy. Being a D lens it requires a camera with an in-body focusing motor to autofocus. If that works for you, you will not be sorry if you buy one. If you need the motor in the lens, consider the older versions of the 70-200 or the 80-200 AF-S. Best of luck.
Jun 7, 2018 12:38:31 #
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.