Chicflat wrote:
Linda, I am honored that you looked. Your doing so gives me an opportunity to say to you that your evaluations and reasoning always is instructive. #3 was the first image that I cut from the original image. The contrasts is what I saw. The "pano" was the last of the three. When I did I thought that it might be too broad to hold the eye. I think it was the parallel curves that I tried to reveal. Again, thank you for your insights; they will help me see better in the future.
Very much appreciated! There are a whole lotta folks on this site more accomplished than I in giving feedback, but I do try my best
Wdross and graphic1 are adding great insights as seen from their points of view also.
There are two specialty forums on UHH where the "norm" is to speak in depth about posted images: critique and
. Personally, I recommend FYC.