I think we can agree that we all have our own opinions and words to convey those opinion but in face are all trying to convey the same thing.
R.G. wrote:
3,000,000+ responses..... that's a lot to wade through
. Has anybody done a good job of condensing it down into an efficient learning curve?
timtim47 wrote:
Sorry: I meant to add this photo in my last post.
Wow! THAT is interesting. I would have like to see it larger.
DanielB wrote:
I think we can agree that we all have our own opinions and words to convey those opinion but in face are all trying to convey the same thing.
Is that "Everybody needs a light"?
tallshooter wrote:
Is that "Everybody needs a light"?
No, mushrooms like the dark.
CamB
Loc: Juneau, Alaska
So many times on my tours, I see the guests shooting subjects and I'm almost shouting, "Look at the Light." It can be hard to see if you don't study light. The picture of the sealions was just such a time. My guests were all going long lens and close up while I was pulling back to get the rays. I see days as either subject days (lousy light-look for subjects), or light days (great light where almost any subject can be a good picture.) I've thrown in a few more pictures that favor light just for the fun of it.
..Cam
CatMarley wrote:
This forum, like so many others seems focused on gear and on sharpness, but I have seen very little about light. Photography is all about light. Most photos I have seen here are well focused, with good color, well exposed even well composed, but lacking "the light". They are mostly flat. Seems to me that "seeing the light" is the one most important ingredient of a good photo. Even the most ordinary things become objects of beauty in the right light. It would be great to have a discussion of LIGHT with examples.
This forum, like so many others seems focused on g... (
show quote)
CamB
Loc: Juneau, Alaska
This doesn't sit right with me. A picture can have "great light" because of the lack of contrast. There are many things that make light look good. Also, you can not understand light and still get great pictures.
..Cam
Jeffcs wrote:
Really just really!
All of you are dancing around the reason some “light” “looks” so much better.
It’s called CONTRAST!!!
Don’t get me wrong it’s not just contrast, there’s a lot more that goes into an outstanding image and until you figure that out your going to be a mediocre shooter at best.
rehess
Loc: South Bend, Indiana, USA
CatMarley wrote:
You may be missing the point. The point is that recognizing that (for instance) the light falling on your subject from the angle you are standing now is flat, and by moving to another position, the light will reveal depth and texture, you are CHOOSING what photons your camera will collect. Learning how to "see the light" WILL make you a better photographer. Getting xxx camera or xxx lens will not.
I will submit these two snaps again to illustrate. They were both taken at the same time with the same camera and lens, and the same light source - a window, The only difference was where the camera was situated. I chose the photons I wanted.
You may be missing the point. The point is that re... (
show quote)
That's great if you are thinking as an artist. People like Nick Ut, or the Times Square photographer, had to shoot when the picture presented itself.
CamB wrote:
This doesn't sit right with me. A picture can have "great light" because of the lack of contrast. There are many things that make light look good. Also, you can not understand light and still get great pictures.
..Cam
And a blind squirrel can find a nut.
rehess wrote:
That's great if you are thinking as an artist. People like Nick Ut, or the Times Square photographer, had to shoot when the picture presented itself.
A photojournalist may not have the choice to find the best light but he will have the best photo when he does happen to have it! It is like the difference between self defense and marksmanship.
R.G. wrote:
Magazines can be good at simplifying things, but it seems a lot to get through. What we need is a good, informative, inspiring discussion thread
.
The T-L Library is half a shelf of books. I put a photo of them at the end of my post.
No magazines were involved (except that the photographers and editors of Time-Life — the company — wrote and compiled the series).
A discussion thread on light and lighting could stretch on for hundreds of pages, a large portion of which would be petty arguments, insults, misinformation, and other 💩.
For the fundamentals, nothing beats well-vetted, well-edited sources. So much of what’s on the ‘Net is untrue, half-true, indecipherable, opinionated, and a waste of time, like most of the talking head videos on YouTube.
Cat, this is a little late and this is not specifically about light but it’s a topic I had a few years ago about Sunrise/Sunsets which by default are about LIGHT!
Lots of examples of light.
Feel free to add to it if you have any sunrise/sunsets!!!
Thanks for a topic about light!
SS
MrT
Loc: Gilbert, AZ
In support of Today's topic. Fuji scans from the 90's. I have not yet mastered the the digital equivalent.
CatMarley wrote:
This forum, like so many others seems focused on gear and on sharpness, but I have seen very little about light. Photography is all about light. Most photos I have seen here are well focused, with good color, well exposed even well composed, but lacking "the light". They are mostly flat. Seems to me that "seeing the light" is the one most important ingredient of a good photo. Even the most ordinary things become objects of beauty in the right light. It would be great to have a discussion of LIGHT with examples.
This forum, like so many others seems focused on g... (
show quote)
In general, the best use of light I have seen is in B&W. Shadows rule! >Alan
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.