Gene51 Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)

A camera without an AA filter is not sharper, but it can record a little more detail. Sharpness is a qualitative and relative thing and mostly pertains to lenses, and it can be enhanced to some degree with some carefully applied post processing.

It's hard to put a number on sharpness as easily as you can on contrast and resolution - the two components that create the perception of sharpness.

Also, viewing distance and eyesight have a lot to do with sharpness. A high contrast print with lower resolution will almost always be perceived as sharper than a high res print of the same image printed at low contrast.

Not having an AA filter is great for highly detailed, "high frequency" images (lots of texture and fine detail) especially if they will be viewed at close distances.

I can clearly see the difference between my D800 and D810. The D810 does not only show more detail, but my file sizes are bigger, indicating that more is being recorded. But with a 40x60 print at normal viewing distance, it's not possible to tell them apart. Move in closer, and you can see it, though.

warrior Loc: Paso Robles CA

Of the 3; I take the D500

bpulv Loc: Buena Park, CA

I moved from the D90 to a D800 a few years ago. There is a world of difference in the capabilities and the image quality between cropped and full frame. However, there is a cost and I am not talking about price. Full frame cameras are considerably larger and heavier than crop frames. In addition, the lenses are heavier too. It took a few cruises and a land trip in Europe to figure out the best way to travel with a full frame.

If you take tours when you travel, you will need a small lens so that you will have the space to use your camera when you are shooting out the window of a cramped bus. I learned that the first time I took my f2.8 24-70mm on a bus. Unless you sit in the aisle seat with no one in the window seat, it won't work. I have a Nikkor 28-105mm D lens from my film days that I now take for those situations. You can buy one on line in top condition for $150 or less.

As far as the weight, I use a Cotton Carrier which centers the weight of the camera on my body and provides protection from snatch and grab theft. When I need to use the camera, the camera quickly unlocks from the Cotton Carrier and the camera is protected from drops by a built in tether. I have two Adorama Slinger lens cases that I attach on the sides of the Cotton Carrier. One holds my second lens and the other holds an SB-700 flash unit. I occasionally wear cargo pants, not only for comfort, but also because I can carry accessories in the large pockets.

When I am shooting on the ship, I use my 24-70mm most of the time. I also carry a 14mm for seascapes, landscapes and building interiors. The 14mm is a necessity for European churches and photographing small rooms.

It is important that you travel as lite and compactly as possible. Although, I use to take everything in a Tenba roalabord when flying. I now fly with everything tucked between my feet. To do that, I pack the Cotton Carrier and a monopod in my checked baggage. The camera, 24-70, 28-70 and a few accessories fit in a sling bag with the two Slinger lens cases containing my flash and the 14mm attached to the strap of the sling bag. It is a tight fit with my feet, but it works; even on a 17 hour flight to Australia.

Robeng Loc: California

Steve,

Here's my opinion for what its worth. I have 3 full frame Nikon cameras and love them. I use them for photographing pretty much everything. The problem with full frame equipment is you have to up grade to full frame lenses which cost a little more and they are heavier. I found this out when I photograph Machu Picchu a few years ago. Carrying 30lbs of camera equipment climbing up and down those ruins almost gave me a heart attack.

Last year I had the opportunity to photograph China, knowing that I would be visiting the Great Wall I decided to travel lite. I had Nikon send me a D500 with a grip, 18mm-300mm lens and a wide angle lens. I used that set up for the whole trip and obtained some outstanding images. The D500 was much lighter and did everything my full frames do. I loved the D500 so much I purchased one.

If you already have a bunch of DX lenses then I would consider the D500. If you don't have a lot of DX lenses then moving up to full frame is awesome. I've seen some good deals on the D750.

Good luck in deciding
Rob / NPS

JR45 Loc: Montgomery County, TX

I have both the D7200 and the D500, with a 50mm prime, 28-200 (mostly D7200), 18-300 (mostly D500), and 200-500 (both). These two cameras with the proper lens
work well for me. I know some do not like the zoom lens, but I have a limited budget. If I were to have just one, I would pick the D500.

bdk Loc: Sanibel Fl.

I have a 5200, its a nice camera and I use it a lot, but I upgraded to a NIkon D810 , when people say buying better cameras doesnt help your photography, they are wrong.
My pics are much better. Buying a new camera can make you a better photographer. Why, cause you just spent a LOT of money so now you'll want to learn a lot more about your hobby.

stan0301 Loc: Colorado

I have taken over two million pictures, and could not be more pleased than I am with my D500--I have a D810 but rarely use it. The D500 has the same innards (other than chip size) as Nikon's best--If I dropped it I would buy another in a minute.
Stan

whwiden

I have 4 Nikon cameras-F2S photomic, D3300, D7200, D750. If you do not print, and want a light travel kit, I would add a small dx camera. Keep a wide angle on one, and a tele on the other. If you don't mind the extra weight, get a D7200. Still keep the D5200 as a back up.

It really depends on your use, existing lenses, etc. If you like the D5200, maybe look at a D5600. I will say the current pricing makes a D7200 look very good. You could use a dx do everything zoom and a 35mm dx. Or two primes. Or a 18-55 and new 55-200.

But it would help to know your existing lenses and aspirations.

Wingpilot Loc: Wasilla. Ak

A new camera.

hookedupin2005 Loc: Northwestern New Mexico

I would personally take the full frame out of the picture, or you're going to be digging deeper into your pockets for new glass.

ToBoldlyGo Loc: London U.K.

If focussing is an issue, a D500 will outperform a D7200 by a huge margin. You will lose some megapixels. To be honest, if you're not shooting really fast moving things, and even if you are doing some action shots, the D7200 will be great. I've got bikers doing tricks up in the air with my old D80, I've also got perfectly well focussed stock car racing with it too. Where I had problems was with birds in flight. I only seem to have overcome that by buying my D500. The 7200 wasn't getting the shots I wanted in focus. I do miss the cropping a little, but I'm getting things in focus now. If you're torn between the cameras, if all you want is some holiday snaps and some occasional artistic stuff, you may find the 500 overkill, and it's a lot more expensive. But it's weather sealing is better. Oh and the 500 has eye detect, but I'm not sure how this works yet.

You may want to read into features. Look up YouTube reviews, try and find people who do the same type of photography as you. Good luck.

olsonsview

All good cameras. Maybe the D7200 if price matters, D7500 maybe not worth the extra money. D500 is more rugged and better weather seals. That would be my choice if I thought I would be roughing it. A great camera body. The D750 is also good, but the smaller format is lighter, and you do need the more expensive, and bulkier Fx lenses for it.
Another idea: bring black electrical tape. Put a small piece over the nikon name and any other identifiers. Make it look a little banged up and less tempting to a thief?

traderjohn Loc: New York City

There is a lot of uncertainty from an experienced amateur photographer. It appears you are leaning towards Nikons. Buy the D750 and get a lens that suits you.

ray manclark

I have a D610 (FX) and a D7000 (DX) but I do a lot of printing. You say U don't print much so there is no point in using an FX camera. Save your money!!

jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY

I like the D750. Great camera.

Read comparisons and specs, and decide what features are important to you.
(Reviews) https://www.youtube.com/user/TheCameraStoreTV/videos
http://www.cameradecision.com/
http://cameras.reviewed.com/
http://camerasize.com/
http://www.imaging-resource.com/IMCOMP/COMPS01.HTM
http://snapsort.com/compare
http://www.dpreview.com/products/compare/cameras?utm_campaign=internal-link&utm_source=mainmenu&utm_medium=text&ref=mainmenu