tdekany wrote:
My friend, if you think that a perfectly exposed photo is what makes a great picture, then you are correct. However, in my book, “subject matter, light and composition” are the key. Which means that ANY camera can capture a winning photo. You don’t need a Sony sensor for that. How come we have all those amazing shots from the past where truly inferior gear was used?
Hear..hear..!!
It amazes me how some " look down " on yester years equipment , yet as you rightly say , many Great photo s were taken in the past...on said inferior equipment.
Novicus wrote:
Hear..hear..!!
It amazes me how some " look down " on yester years equipment , yet as you rightly say , many Great photo s were taken in the past...on said inferior equipment.
Is the goal to have the best toysimeantools, or to make stunning images?
Rongnongno wrote:
I have not seen any camera able to crack a joke so they are all serious.
Not even a deadpan joke with those things!!!
Romano, I don't usually agree with what you post but that was funny to me. Cheers.
I think the answer to the question is that as long as whatever camera one has works and satisfies the need, then that is a serious camera, and it is up to the photographer to make the very best images he/she can with that camera. So no one needs to feel inadaquate because they don't have the biggest and best gear, and it doesn't mean that a point and shoot or bridge camera is inferior to anything else. Keep in mind, I'm generalizing here, and not targeting any niche style, group, type of phtographer or level of expertise. In my opinion, the whole reason for getting into photography is to have fun with it, maybe even get real good with it, but just enjoy it.
wdross
Loc: Castle Rock, Colorado
Wingpilot wrote:
I think the answer to the question is that as long as whatever camera one has works and satisfies the need, then that is a serious camera, and it is up to the photographer to make the very best images he/she can with that camera. So no one needs to feel inadaquate because they don't have the biggest and best gear, and it doesn't mean that a point and shoot or bridge camera is inferior to anything else. Keep in mind, I'm generalizing here, and not targeting any niche style, group, type of phtographer or level of expertise. In my opinion, the whole reason for getting into photography is to have fun with it, maybe even get real good with it, but just enjoy it.
I think the answer to the question is that as long... (
show quote)
That's what it is all about.
OMG I am going to the garage and let the car run....
Get the camera to do the job you need done..
The facts.. DSLR sales are growing slightly, Point and Shoot are in freefall, mainly due to erosion by cell phone cameras.
I use all three and select based on the needed outcome.. All three will make 13x19 prints. Steve411
HLP
Loc: Auburn Hills ,Michigan
I agree with you. I use my Canon 5d II when I need a different lense or for some other issue. Otherwise it is my iPhone 8plus.
Wingpilot.....stated perfectly
bpulv
Loc: Buena Park, CA
Wingpilot wrote:
Much is said here about cellphone cameras, whether a cellphone camera is really a camera, and that perhaps pictures taken with a cellphone camera are even considered photos. Then there are the dedicated cameras that seem to be deemed "lesser" cameras, such as the "point and shoot," and bridge cameras. It seems, at least on the surface, that these cameras aren't considered to be serious cameras because the lenses are fixed and they're lighter, with smaller sensors, even though many of them have all the PASM & Auto modes as well as many other features. Yet because they're small, it seems they're less regarded as a serious camera. Then there's the big jump to the DSLR's and upper end mirrorless cameras. Are they somehow more of a serious camera? Or is the serious part really the photographer behind the shutter button, regardless of the type of camera? So what really constitutes a "serious" camera? How do you all feel about this?
Much is said here about cellphone cameras, whether... (
show quote)
I have never seen a camera with a frown on its face or, for that matter a smile. Therefore, it stands to reason that a person can be a serious photographer, but a camera or cell phone cannot.
bpulv wrote:
I have never seen a camera with a frown on its face or, for that matter a smile. Therefore, it stands to reason that a person can be a serious photographer, but a camera or cell phone cannot.
Exactly, a serious camera is any camera a serious photographer decides to use.
My wife took this photo with her phone when I didn't have my DSLR. I think it's a legitimate photo, don't you?
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.