Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Photo Gallery
Used my husbands camera for the 1st time & was amazed
Page <<first <prev 3 of 4 next>
Mar 31, 2018 14:49:37   #
wirevix Loc: Warrington, England
 
Bushpilot wrote:
Nice work on this fine series of photos. I love the handsome dog portrait!


Thank you Bushpilot!

Reply
Mar 31, 2018 14:51:49   #
wirevix Loc: Warrington, England
 
Wingpilot wrote:
I like your photos, especially of the dog. Pretty good for the first time. Panasonic makes good bridge cameras, but if you want high quality and can afford it, you might consider the Sony RX10iii. It's not cheap, but it worth it. It has a larger, 1" type sensor which will give better images and perform better in low light situations, and a marvelous lens that zooms out to a 35mm equivalent of 600mm.


Thank you Wingpilot!

I'll have a look at that. Thanks for the advice :)

Reply
Mar 31, 2018 14:53:41   #
wirevix Loc: Warrington, England
 
samantha90 wrote:
Very good now get him to buy you a camera



I'm working on it samantha90 :)

Reply
 
 
Mar 31, 2018 15:09:42   #
wirevix Loc: Warrington, England
 
dpullum wrote:
OK OK, next post a side by side comparison of the cameras... and upload the photos so we can see at 100x...

I like your dog, but more than like the crow photos they are outstanding. You took the crow photos at grass level very good indeed. Too often people 6'+ tall take the photos of children and we see only the top of their heads camera level is important, you did very well with the crow.. impressive.

Flowers a bit fuzzy.... did you use spot focus on them? since you did not upload them we have no details.
OK OK, next post a side by side comparison of the ... (show quote)


Hi dpullum

Thank you so much for your advice & your lovely comments.

The top photo was taken last week with my Nikon S9900 compact camera & the 2nd photo was taken today with my husbands Panasonic TZ72





Reply
Mar 31, 2018 16:17:04   #
David in Dallas Loc: Dallas, Texas, USA
 
If you get a camera with built-in GPS, make sure there is a way to disable it. You may not want GPS in photos of your home or your children.

Reply
Mar 31, 2018 16:22:05   #
wirevix Loc: Warrington, England
 
David in Dallas wrote:
If you get a camera with built-in GPS, make sure there is a way to disable it. You may not want GPS in photos of your home or your children.


Thank you David I hadn't even thought of that. Saying that I went to quick look at cameras today & most of the new ones don't have GPS as they say it drains the battery but they do have wifi.

Reply
Mar 31, 2018 20:07:30   #
David in Dallas Loc: Dallas, Texas, USA
 
My DSLRs (Nikon D50, D7000, and D7100) did not have built-in GPS (although Nikon has a device that fits on the hot shoe to do it)--I am glad because I don't want to run down the camera battery with it (GPS requires a while to "boot up" and for camera use pretty much means the camera needs to be left ON for it to be useful). Instead, on my trips and tours, where I desire GPS information, I carry a little GPS logger device that has its own battery. I have I-gotU units and their battery is charged via USB and is good for about 15-20 hours; I charge it while downloading the data to my laptop each evening and am ready for the next day's activities. The only disadvantage of using an external uncoupled device is that for the coordinates to be synchronized with the pictures the camera clock has to be pretty accurate (at highway speeds--60mph--one second's error equates to 88 feet location error, but it's less a problem when walking). I set the camera clock each day using the Internet time via my laptop and that works. The I-gotU unit is about half the size of an art-gum eraser and very easy to carry. It comes with software to do the location interpretation.

Reply
 
 
Mar 31, 2018 20:09:15   #
tinwhistle
 
To be perfectly honest, I prefer the top image. I'm big on the eye highlight. Either way, I agree with an earlier post: skip the bridge camera and invest in a DSLR... Follow up question: do you really want a camera with GPS?

Reply
Mar 31, 2018 23:45:31   #
woodweasel Loc: bellingham Wa
 
Welcome, and continue to be amazed 👍

Reply
Mar 31, 2018 23:55:13   #
Photogirl17 Loc: Glenwood, Ark.
 
wirevix wrote:
Hi All

As I've said in a previous post I'm new to photography & I use a Nikon S9900 compact camera.

Today I used my husbands Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ72 camera for the first time & am amazed at the quality of the photographs. I still can't believe I actually took these photos


Really nice set.

Reply
Apr 1, 2018 00:13:40   #
Plymouth34 Loc: Pacific Northwest
 
wirevix wrote:
Hi All

As I've said in a previous post I'm new to photography & I use a Nikon S9900 compact camera.

Today I used my husbands Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ72 camera for the first time & am amazed at the quality of the photographs. I still can't believe I actually took these photos




Wow, what a difference from you first post. Very nice. Panasonic (Lumix) makes a great camera. My wife wanted a lighter, multi functional camera. I bought her a Lumix DMC FZ 1,000. I have a Canon 6d, full frame ,

GPS and more.

This sounds like something you might like. The down side is that it is a heavy camera for traveling. Once you start adding lenses, flash, tripod and so on.

I liked my wife's Lumix so much I went out and bought one for myself. I now use that for my travel/vacation camera. My Canon I use for local shoots. Sports, grand-kids, macro photography and so on.

Have fun shopping.

Reply
 
 
Apr 1, 2018 12:46:27   #
wirevix Loc: Warrington, England
 
David in Dallas wrote:
My DSLRs (Nikon D50, D7000, and D7100) did not have built-in GPS (although Nikon has a device that fits on the hot shoe to do it)--I am glad because I don't want to run down the camera battery with it (GPS requires a while to "boot up" and for camera use pretty much means the camera needs to be left ON for it to be useful). Instead, on my trips and tours, where I desire GPS information, I carry a little GPS logger device that has its own battery. I have I-gotU units and their battery is charged via USB and is good for about 15-20 hours; I charge it while downloading the data to my laptop each evening and am ready for the next day's activities. The only disadvantage of using an external uncoupled device is that for the coordinates to be synchronized with the pictures the camera clock has to be pretty accurate (at highway speeds--60mph--one second's error equates to 88 feet location error, but it's less a problem when walking). I set the camera clock each day using the Internet time via my laptop and that works. The I-gotU unit is about half the size of an art-gum eraser and very easy to carry. It comes with software to do the location interpretation.
My DSLRs (Nikon D50, D7000, and D7100) did not hav... (show quote)


Thank you David for the information I didn't know you could get a GPS logger. I have so much to learn. I'm like you like to download all the photographs on the day they are taken, all ready for the next time I use my camera.

Reply
Apr 1, 2018 12:48:18   #
wirevix Loc: Warrington, England
 
tinwhistle wrote:
To be perfectly honest, I prefer the top image. I'm big on the eye highlight. Either way, I agree with an earlier post: skip the bridge camera and invest in a DSLR... Follow up question: do you really want a camera with GPS?


Hi Tinwhistle

I'm beginning to ask myself the same question as my husbands camera doesn't have GPS & I don't seem to have missed it but I have missed the wifi.

Reply
Apr 1, 2018 12:57:49   #
wirevix Loc: Warrington, England
 
Plymouth34 wrote:
Wow, what a difference from you first post. Very nice. Panasonic (Lumix) makes a great camera. My wife wanted a lighter, multi functional camera. I bought her a Lumix DMC FZ 1,000. I have a Canon 6d, full frame ,

GPS and more.

This sounds like something you might like. The down side is that it is a heavy camera for traveling. Once you start adding lenses, flash, tripod and so on.

I liked my wife's Lumix so much I went out and bought one for myself. I now use that for my travel/vacation camera. My Canon I use for local shoots. Sports, grand-kids, macro photography and so on.

Have fun shopping.
Wow, what a difference from you first post. Very ... (show quote)


Hi Plymouth34

Thanks for your advice I will look into it... The thing I like about a bridge camera is you don't have to carry all the lenses. As it's a big step for me to move up to a bigger camera as it is. I've aways had a compact camera all my life. I will continue to use my husbands camera until I decide on what I really want.

Vicky

Reply
Apr 1, 2018 13:56:42   #
David in Dallas Loc: Dallas, Texas, USA
 
wirevix wrote:
Thank you David for the information I didn't know you could get a GPS logger. I have so much to learn. I'm like you like to download all the photographs on the day they are taken, all ready for the next time I use my camera.
Here is a review of the I-gotU unit: https://digital-photography-school.com/i-gotu-gt-120-gps-data-logger-review/.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 4 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Photo Gallery
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.